These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
457 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15746747)
1. Does esophagogastric anastomotic technique influence the outcome of patients with esophageal cancer? Ercan S; Rice TW; Murthy SC; Rybicki LA; Blackstone EH J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Mar; 129(3):623-31. PubMed ID: 15746747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Propensity-matched analysis of three techniques for intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis. Blackmon SH; Correa AM; Wynn B; Hofstetter WL; Martin LW; Mehran RJ; Rice DC; Swisher SG; Walsh GL; Roth JA; Vaporciyan AA Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 May; 83(5):1805-13; discussion 1813. PubMed ID: 17462404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer. Kondra J; Ong SR; Clifton J; Evans K; Finley RJ; Yee J Dis Esophagus; 2008; 21(5):422-9. PubMed ID: 19125796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled in esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study. Luechakiettisak P; Kasetsunthorn S J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 May; 91(5):681-5. PubMed ID: 18672632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leaks after transhiatal esophagectomy: risk factors, presentation, and detection. Cooke DT; Lin GC; Lau CL; Zhang L; Si MS; Lee J; Chang AC; Pickens A; Orringer MB Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Jul; 88(1):177-84; discussion 184-5. PubMed ID: 19559221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a comparison of thoracic and cervical anastomoses. Blewett CJ; Miller JD; Young JE; Bennett WF; Urschel JD Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Apr; 7(2):75-8. PubMed ID: 11371275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Functional and menometric study of side-to-side stapled anastomosis and traditional hand-sewn anastomosis in cervical esophagogastrostomy. Deng B; Wang RW; Jiang YG; Tan QY; Zhao YP; Zhou JH; Liao XL; Ma Z Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 18848461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comprehensive review of anastomotic technique in 432 esophagectomies. Price TN; Nichols FC; Harmsen WS; Allen MS; Cassivi SD; Wigle DA; Shen KR; Deschamps C Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Apr; 95(4):1154-60; discussion 1160-1. PubMed ID: 23395626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of end-to-side hand-sewn and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy: an Iranian retrospective cohort study. Rasihashemi SZ; Ramouz A; Beheshtirouy S; Amini H BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):250. PubMed ID: 32736599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Utility of total mechanical stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a comparison to conventional anastomotic techniques. Santos RS; Raftopoulos Y; Singh D; DeHoyos A; Fernando HC; Keenan RJ; Luketich JD; Landreneau RJ Surgery; 2004 Oct; 136(4):917-25. PubMed ID: 15467679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of manual and mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Hsu HH; Chen JS; Huang PM; Lee JM; Lee YC Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Jun; 25(6):1097-101. PubMed ID: 15145015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anastomotic complications after esophagectomy for cancer. A comparison of neck and chest anastomoses. Lam TC; Fok M; Cheng SW; Wong J J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Aug; 104(2):395-400. PubMed ID: 1495302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anastomotic complications associated with stapled versus hand-sewn anastomosis. Worrell S; Mumtaz S; Tsuboi K; Lee TH; Mittal SK J Surg Res; 2010 Jun; 161(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 19922950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Manual compared with mechanical cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis: a randomised trial. Laterza E; de' Manzoni G; Veraldi GF; Guglielmi A; Tedesco P; Cordiano C Eur J Surg; 1999 Nov; 165(11):1051-4. PubMed ID: 10595609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A single-layer, continuous, hand-sewn method for esophageal anastomosis: prospective evaluation in 218 patients. Law S; Suen DT; Wong KH; Kwok KF; Wong J Arch Surg; 2005 Jan; 140(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 15655203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical esophagogastric anastomosis with a new stapler in the surgery of esophageal carcinoma. Chunwei F; Qingzeng N; Jianliang L; Weiji W Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2005 Aug; 28(2):291-5. PubMed ID: 15949948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anastomotic leak and stricture after hand-sewn versus linear-stapled intrathoracic oesophagogastric anastomosis: single-centre analysis of 415 oesophagectomies. Harustiak T; Pazdro A; Snajdauf M; Stolz A; Lischke R Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jun; 49(6):1650-9. PubMed ID: 26574497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Embedded Three-Layer Esophagogastric Anastomosis Reduces Morbidity and Improves Short-Term Outcomes After Esophagectomy for Cancer. Sun HB; Li Y; Liu XB; Zhang RX; Wang ZF; Zheng Y; Qin JJ; Li HM; Chen XK; Wu Z Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 101(3):1131-8. PubMed ID: 26687140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of hand-sewn and circular stapled esophagogastric anastomoses in the neck after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis. Ozawa H; Kawakubo H; Nishimura E; Matsuda S; Takemura R; Irino T; Fukuda K; Nakamura R; Wada N; Kitagawa Y Dis Esophagus; 2023 Feb; 36(3):. PubMed ID: 36222073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]