These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1574680)

  • 1. Three-year evaluation of effect of surface conditioning on bonding of glass ionomer cement in cervical abrasion lesions.
    van Dijken J
    Scand J Dent Res; 1992 Apr; 100(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 1574680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of cavity pretreatment procedures on dentin bonding: a four-year clinical evaluation.
    van Dijken JW
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Aug; 64(2):148-52. PubMed ID: 2202813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Four-year evaluation of the effect of 10% polyacrylic acid or water rinsing pretreatment on retention of glass polyalkenoate cement.
    van Dijken JW
    Eur J Oral Sci; 1996 Feb; 104(1):64-6. PubMed ID: 8653499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of dentine conditioning with polyacrylic acid on the clinical performance of glass ionomer cement--3-year results.
    Tyas MJ
    Aust Dent J; 1994 Aug; 39(4):220-1. PubMed ID: 7945049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations.
    Powell LV; Johnson GH; Gordon GE
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8700767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.
    Ermiş RB
    Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical comparison of Class V resin composite and glass ionomer restorations.
    Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH
    Am J Dent; 1992 Oct; 5(5):249-52. PubMed ID: 1299249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of dentine conditioning with polyacrylic acid on the clinical performance of glass ionomer cement.
    Tyas MJ
    Aust Dent J; 1993 Feb; 38(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 8447771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and two polyacid-modified resin composites in cervical lesions restorations: 1-year follow-up.
    Chinelatti MA; Ramos RP; Chimello DT; Palma-Dibb RG
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Mar; 31(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 15025658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical evaluation of direct esthetic restorations in cervical abrasion/erosion lesions: one-year results.
    Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Sep; 22(9):687-92. PubMed ID: 1835107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microleakage of glass ionomer cement and composite resin restorations in cut non-retentive preparations and pre-existing cervical erosion/abrasion lesions.
    Kaplan I; Harris EF; Mincer HH; Gilpatrick RO
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1993 Apr; 73(2):24-8. PubMed ID: 8309244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensitivity restored of Class V abrasion/erosion lesions.
    Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1990 Dec; 121(6):694-6. PubMed ID: 2148943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical evaluation of a glass ionomer cement for restoration of cervical erosion.
    Charbeneau GT; Bozell RR
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1979 Jun; 98(6):936-9. PubMed ID: 379095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two-year clinical performance of a polyacid-modified resin composite and a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material.
    Brackett WW; Browning WD; Ross JA; Brackett MG
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 11203770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two-year clinical effectiveness of a resin-modified glass-ionomer adhesive.
    Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Am J Dent; 2003 Dec; 16(6):363-8. PubMed ID: 15002948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A three-year clinical evaluation of two dentin bonding agents.
    Matis BA; Cochran MJ; Carlson TJ; Guba C; Eckert GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2004 Apr; 135(4):451-7. PubMed ID: 15127867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retention of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. A 6-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):541-7. PubMed ID: 16005793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bond strength of glass-ionomer cements to caries-affected dentin.
    Palma-Dibb RG; de Castro CG; Ramos RP; Chimello DT; Chinelatti MA
    J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 12729084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jul; 24(7):915-22. PubMed ID: 18155288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Five-year study of cervical erosions restored with resin and dentin-bonding agent.
    Hansen EK
    Scand J Dent Res; 1992 Aug; 100(4):244-7. PubMed ID: 1439532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.