These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15747039)

  • 1. Quantification of aortic valve area and left ventricular muscle mass in healthy subjects and patients with symptomatic aortic valve stenosis by MRI.
    Haimerl J; Freitag-Krikovic A; Rauch A; Sauer E
    Z Kardiol; 2005 Mar; 94(3):173-81. PubMed ID: 15747039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prevalence, pattern, and functional impact of late gadolinium enhancement in left ventricular hypertrophy due to aortic valve stenosis.
    Nassenstein K; Bruder O; Breuckmann F; Erbel R; Barkhausen J; Schlosser T
    Rofo; 2009 May; 181(5):472-6. PubMed ID: 19241322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Aortic valve area, stroke volume, left ventricular hypertrophy, remodeling, and fibrosis in aortic stenosis assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: comparison between high and low gradient and normal and low flow aortic stenosis.
    Barone-Rochette G; Piérard S; Seldrum S; de Meester de Ravenstein C; Melchior J; Maes F; Pouleur AC; Vancraeynest D; Pasquet A; Vanoverschelde JL; Gerber BL
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Nov; 6(6):1009-17. PubMed ID: 24100045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Planimetry of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging.
    Debl K; Djavidani B; Seitz J; Nitz W; Schmid FX; Muders F; Buchner S; Feuerbach S; Riegger G; Luchner A
    Invest Radiol; 2005 Oct; 40(10):631-6. PubMed ID: 16189431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of aortic valve area measured by magnetic resonance imaging and dual-source computed tomography.
    Bruder O; Jochims M; Hunold P; Jensen C; Forsting M; Sabin GV; Barkhausen J; Schlosser T
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Jul; 50(6):645-51. PubMed ID: 19452337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Planimetry of the aortic valve orifice area: comparison of multislice spiral computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Westermann Y; Geigenmüller A; Elgeti T; Wagner M; Dushe S; Borges AC; Dohmen PM; Hein PA; Lembcke A
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):426-35. PubMed ID: 19783394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outcome Implication of Aortic Valve Area Normalized to Body Size in Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis.
    Tribouilloy C; Bohbot Y; Maréchaux S; Debry N; Delpierre Q; Peltier M; Diouf M; Slama M; Messika-Zeitoun D; Rusinaru D
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Nov; 9(11):. PubMed ID: 27903539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of left ventricular outflow tract geometry in non-stenotic and stenotic aortic valves by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Burgstahler C; Kunze M; Löffler C; Gawaz MP; Hombach V; Merkle N
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2006; 8(6):825-9. PubMed ID: 17060105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlation of aortic valve area obtained by the velocity-encoded phase contrast continuity method to direct planimetry using cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Tanaka K; Makaryus AN; Wolff SD
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2007; 9(5):799-805. PubMed ID: 17891618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantification of aortic valve area at 256-slice computed tomography: comparison with transesophageal echocardiography and cardiac catheterization in subjects with high-grade aortic valve stenosis prior to percutaneous valve replacement.
    Klass O; Walker MJ; Olszewski ME; Bahner J; Feuerlein S; Hoffmann MH; Lang A
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Oct; 80(1):151-7. PubMed ID: 20832221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inconsistent grading of aortic valve stenosis by current guidelines: haemodynamic studies in patients with apparently normal left ventricular function.
    Minners J; Allgeier M; Gohlke-Baerwolf C; Kienzle RP; Neumann FJ; Jander N
    Heart; 2010 Sep; 96(18):1463-8. PubMed ID: 20813727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The complex nature of discordant severe calcified aortic valve disease grading: new insights from combined Doppler echocardiographic and computed tomographic study.
    Clavel MA; Messika-Zeitoun D; Pibarot P; Aggarwal SR; Malouf J; Araoz PA; Michelena HI; Cueff C; Larose E; Capoulade R; Vahanian A; Enriquez-Sarano M
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Dec; 62(24):2329-38. PubMed ID: 24076528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of aortic valve area combining echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Nickl W; Füth R; Smettan J; Köhler T; Lankisch M; Kramer F; Krahn T; Barroso MC; Klein RM; Dinh W
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 2012 Mar; 98(3):234-42. PubMed ID: 22370613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Left ventricular longitudinal shortening in patients with aortic stenosis: relationship with symptomatic status.
    Tongue AG; Dumesnil JG; Laforest I; Theriault C; Durand LG; Pibarot P
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Mar; 12(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 12701783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Magnetic resonance to assess the aortic valve area in aortic stenosis: how does it compare to current diagnostic standards?
    John AS; Dill T; Brandt RR; Rau M; Ricken W; Bachmann G; Hamm CW
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2003 Aug; 42(3):519-26. PubMed ID: 12906983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Aortic valve stenosis planimetry by means of three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in the real clinical setting: feasibility, reliability and systematic deviations.
    Saura D; de la Morena G; Flores-Blanco PJ; Oliva MJ; Caballero L; González-Carrillo J; Espinosa MD; López-Ruiz M; García-Navarro M; Valdés M
    Echocardiography; 2015 Mar; 32(3):508-15. PubMed ID: 25041359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hemodynamic assessment of severe aortic stenosis: MRI evaluation of dynamic changes of vena contracta.
    Weininger M; Sagmeister F; Herrmann S; Lange V; Schoepf UJ; Beissert M; Voelker W; Koestler H; Hahn D; Weidemann F; Beer M
    Invest Radiol; 2011 Jan; 46(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 21102347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of dual-source computed tomography for the quantification of the aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis versus transthoracic echocardiography and invasive hemodynamic assessment.
    Ropers D; Ropers U; Marwan M; Schepis T; Pflederer T; Wechsel M; Klinghammer L; Flachskampf FA; Daniel WG; Achenbach S
    Am J Cardiol; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1561-7. PubMed ID: 19932793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adjusting parameters of aortic valve stenosis severity by body size.
    Minners J; Gohlke-Baerwolf C; Kaufmann BA; Bahlmann E; Gerdts E; Boman K; Chambers JB; Nienaber CA; Willenheimer R; Wachtell K; Holme I; Pedersen TR; Neumann FJ; Jander N
    Heart; 2014 Jul; 100(13):1024-30. PubMed ID: 24780909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 3-T magnetic resonance for determination of aortic valve area: a comparison to echocardiography.
    Speiser U; Quick S; Haas D; Youssef A; Waessnig NK; Ibrahim K; Strasser RH; Schoen S
    Scand Cardiovasc J; 2014 Jun; 48(3):176-83. PubMed ID: 24650089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.