These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15747149)

  • 1. [3D ultrasound (3D US) in the diagnosis of focal breast lesions].
    Kotsianos D; Wirth S; Fischer T; Hiltawsky K; Sittek H; Reiser M
    Radiologe; 2005 Mar; 45(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 15747149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Malignant and benign breast masses on 3D US volumetric images: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologist accuracy.
    Sahiner B; Chan HP; Roubidoux MA; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Paramagul C; Bailey J; Nees AV; Blane C
    Radiology; 2007 Mar; 242(3):716-24. PubMed ID: 17244717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of 3D and 2D shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses: focus on the diagnostic performance.
    Choi HY; Sohn YM; Seo M
    Clin Radiol; 2017 Oct; 72(10):878-886. PubMed ID: 28526455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Whole Breast Ultrasound: Comparison of the Visibility of Suspicious Lesions with Automated Breast Volumetric Scanning Versus Hand-Held Breast Ultrasound.
    Kuzmiak CM; Ko EY; Tuttle LA; Steed D; Zeng D; Yoon SC
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Jul; 22(7):870-9. PubMed ID: 25872862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic algorithm: how to make use of new 2D, 3D and 4D ultrasound technologies in breast imaging.
    Weismann CF; Datz L
    Eur J Radiol; 2007 Nov; 64(2):250-7. PubMed ID: 17904779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Characterization of sonographically detected breast lesions using three-dimensional data sets].
    Fischer T; Filimonow S; Hamm B; Slowinski T; Thomas A
    Rofo; 2006 Dec; 178(12):1224-34. PubMed ID: 17136646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How to optimize breast ultrasound.
    Athanasiou A; Tardivon A; Ollivier L; Thibault F; El Khoury C; Neuenschwander S
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 69(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 18818037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automated Breast Volume Scanning: Identifying 3-D Coronal Plane Imaging Features May Help Categorize Complex Cysts.
    Wang HY; Jiang YX; Zhu QL; Zhang J; Xiao MS; Liu H; Dai Q; Li JC; Sun Q
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Mar; 42(3):689-98. PubMed ID: 26742895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Added value of Virtual Touch IQ shear wave elastography in the ultrasound assessment of breast lesions.
    Ianculescu V; Ciolovan LM; Dunant A; Vielh P; Mazouni C; Delaloge S; Dromain C; Blidaru A; Balleyguier C
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 May; 83(5):773-7. PubMed ID: 24602803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of 107 breast lesions with automated 3D ultrasound and comparison with mammography and manual ultrasound.
    Kotsianos-Hermle D; Hiltawsky KM; Wirth S; Fischer T; Friese K; Reiser M
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 18468829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automated 3D ultrasound image segmentation to aid breast cancer image interpretation.
    Gu P; Lee WM; Roubidoux MA; Yuan J; Wang X; Carson PL
    Ultrasonics; 2016 Feb; 65():51-8. PubMed ID: 26547117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer-assisted assessment of ultrasound real-time elastography: initial experience in 145 breast lesions.
    Zhang X; Xiao Y; Zeng J; Qiu W; Qian M; Wang C; Zheng R; Zheng H
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24148563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses with US strain imaging.
    Burnside ES; Hall TJ; Sommer AM; Hesley GK; Sisney GA; Svensson WE; Fine JP; Jiang J; Hangiandreou NJ
    Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):401-10. PubMed ID: 17940302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative study of automated breast 3-D ultrasound and handheld B-mode ultrasound for differentiation of benign and malignant breast masses.
    Chen L; Chen Y; Diao XH; Fang L; Pang Y; Cheng AQ; Li WP; Wang Y
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1735-42. PubMed ID: 23849390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. First clinical use of a standardized three-dimensional ultrasound for breast imaging.
    Kotsianos-Hermle D; Wirth S; Fischer T; Hiltawsky KM; Reiser M
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 18479867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiologists' performance in the detection of benign and malignant masses with 3D automated breast ultrasound (ABUS).
    Chang JM; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Kim SJ
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Apr; 78(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 21330080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterization of benign and malignant solid breast masses: harmonic versus nonharmonic 3D power Doppler imaging.
    Hsiao YH; Huang YL; Liang WM; Lin C; Kuo SJ; Chen DR
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 35(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 19041173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speckle reduction approach for breast ultrasound image and its application to breast cancer diagnosis.
    Su Y; Wang H; Wang Y; Guo Y; Cheng H; Zhang Y; Tian J
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 75(1):e136-41. PubMed ID: 19913380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bimodal Multiparameter-Based Approach for Benign-Malignant Classification of Breast Tumors.
    Ara SR; Alam F; Rahman MH; Akhter S; Awwal R; Hasan K
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Jul; 41(7):2022-38. PubMed ID: 25913281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Power Doppler sonography: anything to add to BI-RADS US in solid breast masses?
    Gokalp G; Topal U; Kizilkaya E
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 18243623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.