These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15747544)

  • 1. [Effects of mere subliminal exposure on trait judgments and the role of stereotyped knowledge].
    Yamada A
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2004 Jun; 75(2):134-41. PubMed ID: 15747544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stereotypes and social judgment: the effects of typicality and group heterogeneity.
    Lambert AJ; Wyer RS
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1990 Oct; 59(4):676-91. PubMed ID: 2254850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The effects of subliminal and supraliminal presentation of trait-related words on person perception].
    Mori T; Sakamoto A
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1997 Dec; 68(5):371-8. PubMed ID: 9551539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of accessibility and subjective relevance on the use of piecemeal and category information in impression formation.
    Köpetz C; Kruglanski AW
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 May; 34(5):692-705. PubMed ID: 18308925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The actor as context for social judgments: effects of prior impressions and stereotypes.
    Stewart TL; Doan KA; Gingrich BE; Smith ER
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1998 Nov; 75(5):1132-54. PubMed ID: 9866181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Thinking in categories or along a continuum: consequences for children's social judgments.
    Master A; Markman EM; Dweck CS
    Child Dev; 2012; 83(4):1145-63. PubMed ID: 22540868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. I'm like you and you're like me: social projection and self-stereotyping both help explain self-other correspondence.
    Cho JC; Knowles ED
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Mar; 104(3):444-56. PubMed ID: 23276270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Categorical perception for unfamiliar faces. The effect of covert and overt face learning.
    Kikutani M; Roberson D; Hanley JR
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Jun; 21(6):865-72. PubMed ID: 20483817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of priming a bipolar attribute concept on dimension versus concept-specific accessibility of semantic memory.
    Park JW; Yoon SO; Kim KH; Wyer RS
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2001 Sep; 81(3):405-20. PubMed ID: 11554643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceiver and target characteristics contribute to impression formation differently across race and gender.
    Xie SY; Flake JK; Hehman E
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Aug; 117(2):364-385. PubMed ID: 30550328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stereotypes shape response competition when forming impressions.
    Hester N; Xie SY; Bertin JA; Hehman E
    Group Process Intergroup Relat; 2023 Dec; 26(8):1706-1725. PubMed ID: 38021317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ironic Effects of Sexual Minority Group Membership: Are Lesbians Less Susceptible to Invoking Negative Female Stereotypes than Heterosexual Women?
    Niedlich C; Steffens MC; Krause J; Settke E; Ebert ID
    Arch Sex Behav; 2015 Jul; 44(5):1439-47. PubMed ID: 25510890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of processing fluency on impressions of familiarity and liking.
    Westerman DL; Lanska M; Olds JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):426-38. PubMed ID: 25528088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cultural differences in the primacy effect for person perception.
    Noguchi K; Kamada A; Shrira I
    Int J Psychol; 2014 Jun; 49(3):208-10. PubMed ID: 24821510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stereotypes as justifications of prejudice.
    Crandall CS; Bahns AJ; Warner R; Schaller M
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1488-98. PubMed ID: 21659564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The composition of category conjunctions.
    Hutter RR; Crisp RJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2005 May; 31(5):647-57. PubMed ID: 15802659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pain and social cognition: does pain lead to more stereotyped judgments based on ethnicity and age?
    Gunnarsson H; Agerström J
    Scand J Pain; 2020 Jul; 20(3):611-621. PubMed ID: 32101530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Category activation effects in judgment and behaviour: the moderating role of perceived comparability.
    Aarts H; Dijksterhuis A
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2002 Mar; 41(Pt 1):123-38. PubMed ID: 11970778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The mere exposure effect is differentially sensitive to different judgment tasks.
    Seamon JG; McKenna PA; Binder N
    Conscious Cogn; 1998 Mar; 7(1):85-102. PubMed ID: 9521834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Subliminal mere exposure: specific, general, and diffuse effects.
    Monahan JL; Murphy ST; Zajonc RB
    Psychol Sci; 2000 Nov; 11(6):462-6. PubMed ID: 11202490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.