These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15747549)

  • 21. Exploratory structural equation modeling: an integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.
    Marsh HW; Morin AJ; Parker PD; Kaur G
    Annu Rev Clin Psychol; 2014; 10():85-110. PubMed ID: 24313568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assigning cases to groups using taxometric results: an empirical comparison of classification techniques.
    Ruscio J
    Assessment; 2009 Mar; 16(1):55-70. PubMed ID: 18607008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Two-Step Estimation of Models Between Latent Classes and External Variables.
    Bakk Z; Kuha J
    Psychometrika; 2018 Dec; 83(4):871-892. PubMed ID: 29150817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A beta unfolding model for continuous bounded responses.
    Noel Y
    Psychometrika; 2014 Oct; 79(4):647-74. PubMed ID: 24327063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Latent growth curves within developmental structural equation models.
    McArdle JJ; Epstein D
    Child Dev; 1987 Feb; 58(1):110-33. PubMed ID: 3816341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Exploring the key factors in the choice of home telehealth by using the health belief model.
    Huang JC; Lin SP
    Telemed J E Health; 2009 Jan; 15(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 19199852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Robustness of fit indices to outliers and leverage observations in structural equation modeling.
    Yuan KH; Zhong X
    Psychol Methods; 2013 Jun; 18(2):121-36. PubMed ID: 23527606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An analysis of item response theory and Rasch models based on the most probable distribution method.
    Noventa S; Stefanutti L; Vidotto G
    Psychometrika; 2014 Jul; 79(3):377-402. PubMed ID: 25205004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A general class of latent variable models for ordinal manifest variables with covariate effects on the manifest and latent variables.
    Moustaki I
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):337-57. PubMed ID: 14633339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Asymptotics of AIC, BIC, and RMSEA for Model Selection in Structural Equation Modeling.
    Huang PH
    Psychometrika; 2017 Jun; 82(2):407-426. PubMed ID: 28447310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hierarchical diagnostic classification models morphing into unidimensional 'diagnostic' classification models-a commentary.
    von Davier M; Haberman SJ
    Psychometrika; 2014 Apr; 79(2):340-6. PubMed ID: 24478022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparing standardized coefficients in structural equation modeling: a model reparameterization approach.
    Kwan JL; Chan W
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Sep; 43(3):730-45. PubMed ID: 21512876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An inequality for correlations in unidimensional monotone latent variable models for binary variables.
    Ellis JL
    Psychometrika; 2014 Apr; 79(2):303-16. PubMed ID: 24659373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Comparison of several expressions of two-way ANOVA for a latent factor: analysis of the relation between music and mood].
    Ozaki K; Toyoda H
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2005 Jun; 76(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 16022453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Statistical methods for single-case studies in neuropsychology: comparing the slope of a patient's regression line with those of a control sample.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH
    Cortex; 2004 Jun; 40(3):533-48. PubMed ID: 15259332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Formulating clinical research hypotheses as structural equation models: a conceptual overview.
    Hoyle RH; Smith GT
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1994 Jun; 62(3):429-40. PubMed ID: 8063970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accuracy in parameter estimation for targeted effects in structural equation modeling: sample size planning for narrow confidence intervals.
    Lai K; Kelley K
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Jun; 16(2):127-48. PubMed ID: 21417531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Bayesian structural equation modeling in sport and exercise psychology.
    Stenling A; Ivarsson A; Johnson U; Lindwall M
    J Sport Exerc Psychol; 2015 Aug; 37(4):410-20. PubMed ID: 26442771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Introduction to the special section on structural equation modeling.
    Tomarken AJ; Baker TB
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2003 Nov; 112(4):523-5. PubMed ID: 14674866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Detecting latent taxa: Monte Carlo comparison of taxometric, mixture model, and clustering procedures.
    Cleland CM; Rothschild L; Haslam N
    Psychol Rep; 2000 Aug; 87(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 11026388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.