These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15747550)
1. [Trust and cooperation: a comparison of in-group preference and trust behavior between American and Japanese students]. Mashima R; Yamagishi T; Macy M Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2004 Oct; 75(4):308-15. PubMed ID: 15747550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Parochial trust and cooperation across 17 societies. Romano A; Balliet D; Yamagishi T; Liu JH Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Nov; 114(48):12702-12707. PubMed ID: 29133403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cooperation and Shared Beliefs about Trust in the Assurance Game. Jansson F; Eriksson K PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0144191. PubMed ID: 26640892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Trust and cooperation: an experimental study of PD with choice of dependence]. Matsuda M; Yamagishi T Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2001 Dec; 72(5):413-21. PubMed ID: 11883329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nationality dominates gender in decision-making in the Dictator and Prisoner's Dilemma Games. Kumar MM; Tsoi L; Lee MS; Cone J; McAuliffe K PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0244568. PubMed ID: 33439874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Effects of direct and indirect exchange on trust of in-group members]. Kiyonari T; Foddy M; Yamagishi T Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2007 Feb; 77(6):519-27. PubMed ID: 17447460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intergroup emotional exchange: Ingroup guilt and outgroup anger increase resource allocation in trust games. Shore DM; Rychlowska M; van der Schalk J; Parkinson B; Manstead ASR Emotion; 2019 Jun; 19(4):605-616. PubMed ID: 29963884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What games support the evolution of an ingroup bias? Jansson F J Theor Biol; 2015 May; 373():100-10. PubMed ID: 25794651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Emergence of cooperation in one-short prisoner's dilemmas and the role of trust]. Hayashi N Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1995 Aug; 66(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 8544366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: a meta-analysis. Balliet D; Wu J; De Dreu CK Psychol Bull; 2014 Nov; 140(6):1556-81. PubMed ID: 25222635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Visualizing minimal ingroup and outgroup faces: implications for impressions, attitudes, and behavior. Ratner KG; Dotsch R; Wigboldus DH; van Knippenberg A; Amodio DM J Pers Soc Psychol; 2014 Jun; 106(6):897-911. PubMed ID: 24841095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trust and cooperation: a new experimental approach. Acedo C; Gomila A Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2013 Sep; 1299():77-83. PubMed ID: 25708082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Emergence of frequency-dependent cooperative strategies in iterated social dilemma: an experimental study]. Shinada M; Kameda T Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2003 Apr; 74(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 12840990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The name of the game: predictive power of reputations versus situational labels in determining prisoner's dilemma game moves. Liberman V; Samuels SM; Ross L Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2004 Sep; 30(9):1175-85. PubMed ID: 15359020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Human cooperation in social dilemmas: comparing the Snowdrift game with the Prisoner's Dilemma. Kümmerli R; Colliard C; Fiechter N; Petitpierre B; Russier F; Keller L Proc Biol Sci; 2007 Dec; 274(1628):2965-70. PubMed ID: 17895227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Individuals in the criminal justice system show differences in cooperative behaviour: Implications from cooperative games. Clark BC; Thorne CB; Hendricks PS; Sharp C; Clark SK; Cropsey KL Crim Behav Ment Health; 2015 Jul; 25(3):169-80. PubMed ID: 24910424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cross-cultural differences in relationship- and group-based trust. Yuki M; Maddux WW; Brewer MB; Takemura K Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2005 Jan; 31(1):48-62. PubMed ID: 15574661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of attachment and environmental manipulations on cooperative behavior in the prisoner's dilemma game. Taheri M; Rotshtein P; Beierholm U PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0205730. PubMed ID: 30419027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Expectation and cooperation in prisoner's dilemmas: The moderating role of game riskiness. Ng GT; Au WT Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Apr; 23(2):353-60. PubMed ID: 26231694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]