223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15747766)
1. The accuracy of digital-video retinal imaging to screen for diabetic retinopathy: an analysis of two digital-video retinal imaging systems using standard stereoscopic seven-field photography and dilated clinical examination as reference standards.
Lawrence MG
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2004; 102():321-40. PubMed ID: 15747766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stereo nonmydriatic digital-video color retinal imaging compared with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study seven standard field 35-mm stereo color photos for determining level of diabetic retinopathy.
Bursell SE; Cavallerano JD; Cavallerano AA; Clermont AC; Birkmire-Peters D; Aiello LP; Aiello LM;
Ophthalmology; 2001 Mar; 108(3):572-85. PubMed ID: 11237913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.
Rudnisky CJ; Tennant MT; Weis E; Ting A; Hinz BJ; Greve MD
Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1748-54. PubMed ID: 17368543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness and safety of screening for diabetic retinopathy with two nonmydriatic digital images compared with the seven standard stereoscopic photographic fields.
Boucher MC; Gresset JA; Angioi K; Olivier S
Can J Ophthalmol; 2003 Dec; 38(7):557-68. PubMed ID: 14740797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The sensitivity and specificity of single-field nonmydriatic monochromatic digital fundus photography with remote image interpretation for diabetic retinopathy screening: a comparison with ophthalmoscopy and standardized mydriatic color photography.
Lin DY; Blumenkranz MS; Brothers RJ; Grosvenor DM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 134(2):204-13. PubMed ID: 12140027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nonmydriatic digital imaging alternative for annual retinal examination in persons with previously documented no or mild diabetic retinopathy.
Cavallerano JD; Aiello LP; Cavallerano AA; Katalinic P; Hock K; Kirby R; Aiello LM;
Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Oct; 140(4):667-73. PubMed ID: 16083842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative evaluation of digital imaging, retinal photography and optometrist examination in screening for diabetic retinopathy.
Olson JA; Strachan FM; Hipwell JH; Goatman KA; McHardy KC; Forrester JV; Sharp PF
Diabet Med; 2003 Jul; 20(7):528-34. PubMed ID: 12823232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening for diabetic retinopathy: 1 and 3 nonmydriatic 45-degree digital fundus photographs vs 7 standard early treatment diabetic retinopathy study fields.
Vujosevic S; Benetti E; Massignan F; Pilotto E; Varano M; Cavarzeran F; Avogaro A; Midena E
Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jul; 148(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 19406376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of mydriasis and different field strategies on digital image screening of diabetic eye disease.
Murgatroyd H; Ellingford A; Cox A; Binnie M; Ellis JD; MacEwen CJ; Leese GP
Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 88(7):920-4. PubMed ID: 15205238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Single-field fundus photography for diabetic retinopathy screening: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
Williams GA; Scott IU; Haller JA; Maguire AM; Marcus D; McDonald HR
Ophthalmology; 2004 May; 111(5):1055-62. PubMed ID: 15121388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. One-field, two-field and five-field handheld retinal imaging compared with standard seven-field Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study photography for diabetic retinopathy screening.
Salongcay RP; Jacoba CMP; Salva CMG; Rageh A; Aquino LAC; Saunar AV; Alog GP; Ashraf M; Peto T; Silva PS
Br J Ophthalmol; 2024 May; 108(5):735-741. PubMed ID: 37094836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sensitivity and specificity of digital retinal images in grading diabetic retinopathy.
Saari JM; Summanen P; Kivelä T; Saari KM
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Apr; 82(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 15043527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The sensitivity and specificity of nonmydriatic digital stereoscopic retinal imaging in detecting diabetic retinopathy.
Ahmed J; Ward TP; Bursell SE; Aiello LM; Cavallerano JD; Vigersky RA
Diabetes Care; 2006 Oct; 29(10):2205-9. PubMed ID: 17003294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of two, three and four 45 degrees image fields obtained with the Topcon CRW6 nonmydriatic camera for screening for diabetic retinopathy.
Perrier M; Boucher MC; Angioi K; Gresset JA; Olivier S
Can J Ophthalmol; 2003 Dec; 38(7):569-74. PubMed ID: 14740798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of a digital retinal imaging system and seven-field stereo color fundus photography to detect diabetic retinopathy in the primary care environment.
Schiffman RM; Jacobsen G; Nussbaum JJ; Desai UR; Carey JD; Glasser D; Zimmer-Galler IE; Zeimer R; Goldberg MF
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2005; 36(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 15688971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nonmydriatic digital retinal images for determining diabetic retinopathy.
Tanterdtham J; Singalavanija A; Namatra C; Trinavarat A; Rodanant N; Bamroongsuk P; Thoongsuwan S; Euasobhon W
J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Mar; 90(3):508-12. PubMed ID: 17427528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Screening for diabetic retinopathy in rural area using single-field, digital fundus images.
Ruamviboonsuk P; Wongcumchang N; Surawongsin P; Panyawatananukul E; Tiensuwan M
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Feb; 88(2):176-80. PubMed ID: 15962667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Discrimination of glaucomatous optic neuropathy by digital stereoscopic analysis.
Morgan JE; Sheen NJ; North RV; Goyal R; Morgan S; Ansari E; Wild JM
Ophthalmology; 2005 May; 112(5):855-62. PubMed ID: 15878066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening for diabetic retinopathy: a comparative trial of photography and scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.
Wilson PJ; Ellis JD; MacEwen CJ; Ellingford A; Talbot J; Leese GP
Ophthalmologica; 2010; 224(4):251-7. PubMed ID: 20145421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the effectiveness of detecting diabetic eye disease: diabetic retinal photography versus ophthalmic consultation.
Chia DS; Yap EY
Singapore Med J; 2004 Jun; 45(6):276-9. PubMed ID: 15181522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
