These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15748113)

  • 21. Assessment of speech nasality in children with Robin Sequence.
    Prado-Oliveira R; Marques IL; Souza Ld; Souza-Brosco TV; Dutka Jde C
    Codas; 2015; 27(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 25885197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners' judgments of dysphonic voice.
    Eadie TL; Baylor CR
    J Voice; 2006 Dec; 20(4):527-44. PubMed ID: 16324823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Relationship between perceptual ratings of nasality and nasometry in children/adolescents with cleft palate and/or velopharyngeal dysfunction.
    Sweeney T; Sell D
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2008; 43(3):265-82. PubMed ID: 17852526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Diagnostic value of nasometry--representative study of patients with cleft palate and normal subjects].
    Mueller K; Neuber B; Schelhorn-Neise P; Schumann D
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2007; 59(5):219-26. PubMed ID: 17726324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Some acoustic evidence for vocal abuse in adult speakers with repaired cleft palate.
    Leder SB; Lerman JW
    Laryngoscope; 1985 Jul; 95(7 Pt 1):837-40. PubMed ID: 4010425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Validity and Reliability of Visual Analog Scaling for Assessment of Hypernasality and Audible Nasal Emission in Children With Repaired Cleft Palate.
    Baylis A; Chapman K; Whitehill TL;
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2015 Nov; 52(6):660-70. PubMed ID: 25322442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Velopharyngeal sequels in labial-alveolar-velopalatine clefts. Analysis, conclusions and speech therapy management].
    Gaillot A; Mondie JM; Buffard F; Barthelemy I; Sannajust JP
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2007 Sep; 108(4):329-33. PubMed ID: 17681574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of examiner expectancy on speech ratings of individuals with cleft lip and/or palate.
    Ramig LA
    Cleft Palate J; 1982 Oct; 19(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 6959745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The relationship between nasalance and nasality in children with cleft palate.
    Watterson T; McFarlane SC; Wright DS
    J Commun Disord; 1993 Apr; 26(1):13-28. PubMed ID: 8340487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influence of treatment concept, velopharyngoplasty, gender and age on hypernasality in patients with cleft lip, alveolus and palate.
    Joos U; Wermker K; Kruse-Löesler B; Kleinheinz J
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2006 Dec; 34(8):472-7. PubMed ID: 17157520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Auditory-perceptual evaluation of disordered voice quality: pros, cons and future directions.
    Oates J
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2009; 61(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 19204393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparative study of two acoustic measures of hypernasality.
    Vogel AP; Ibrahim HM; Reilly S; Kilpatrick N
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Dec; 52(6):1640-51. PubMed ID: 19951929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reliability and validity of nasality ratings between a monolingual and bilingual listener for speech samples from English-Spanish-Speaking children.
    Watterson T; Lewis KE; Murdock T; Cordero KN
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2013; 65(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 24157638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Correlation between the perceptual rating of speech in Dutch patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency and composite measures derived from mean nasalance scores.
    Keuning KH; Wieneke GH; Dejonckere PH
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2004; 56(3):157-64. PubMed ID: 15087571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Perceptions of audible nasal emission in speakers with cleft palate: a comparative study of listener judgments.
    Baylis AL; Munson B; Moller KT
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2011 Jul; 48(4):399-411. PubMed ID: 20572776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Acoustic analysis of voice in children with cleft palate and velopharyngeal insufficiency.
    Villafuerte-Gonzalez R; Valadez-Jimenez VM; Hernandez-Lopez X; Ysunza PA
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Jul; 79(7):1073-6. PubMed ID: 25953453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Training speech pathology students in the perceptual evaluation of speech in patients with cleft palate: Reliability results and the students' perspective.
    Bruneel L; Danhieux A; Van Lierde K
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Jun; 157():111145. PubMed ID: 35468487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An acoustic study of the temporal characteristics of nasalization in children with and without cleft palate.
    Ha S; Sim H; Zhi M; Kuehn DP
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2004 Sep; 41(5):535-43. PubMed ID: 15352864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of listener experience and anchors on judgments of dysphonia.
    Eadie TL; Kapsner-Smith M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Apr; 54(2):430-47. PubMed ID: 20884782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Perceptual Anchors and the Dispersion of Nasality Ratings.
    Galek KE; Watterson T
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2017 Jul; 54(4):423-430. PubMed ID: 27043649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.