BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15749421)

  • 1. Bilateral decompression of multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis through a unilateral approach.
    Haba K; Ikeda M; Soma M; Yamashima T
    J Clin Neurosci; 2005 Feb; 12(2):169-71. PubMed ID: 15749421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical assessment of minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: a cadaver study.
    Hamasaki T; Tanaka N; Kim J; Okada M; Ochi M; Hutton WC
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Oct; 22(7):486-91. PubMed ID: 20075811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An endoscopic dural retractor for spinal stenosis surgery.
    Frank EH; Hsu FP
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2002 Sep; 45(3):136-8. PubMed ID: 12353158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bilateral interlaminar fenestration and unroofing for the decompression of nerve roots by using a unilateral approach in lumbar canal stenosis.
    Iwatsuki K; Yoshimine T; Aoki M
    Surg Neurol; 2007 Nov; 68(5):487-92; discussion 492. PubMed ID: 17825382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis in younger age patients could lead to higher stresses in the remaining neural arch -- a finite element investigation.
    Ivanov A; Faizan A; Sairyo K; Ebraheim N; Biyani A; Goel VK
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2007 Feb; 50(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 17546538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Lateral fenestration combined with spinal canal decompression through contralateral laminotomy for radiculopathy caused by lumbar canal stenosis and lumbar foraminal stenosis: a case report].
    Sasaki M; Aoki M; Yoshimine T
    No Shinkei Geka; 2010 May; 38(5):477-83. PubMed ID: 20522920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Bilateral "over the top" decompression through unilateral laminotomy for lumbar and thoracic spinal canal stenosis].
    Banczerowski P; Lipóth L; Veres R
    Ideggyogy Sz; 2007 Nov; 60(11-12):467-73. PubMed ID: 18198793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimally invasive lumbar spinal decompression in the elderly: outcomes of 50 patients aged 75 years and older.
    Rosen DS; O'Toole JE; Eichholz KM; Hrubes M; Huo D; Sandhu FA; Fessler RG
    Neurosurgery; 2007 Mar; 60(3):503-9; discussion 509-10. PubMed ID: 17327795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression for the lumbar spine: a minimally invasive new procedure for lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
    Hatta Y; Shiraishi T; Sakamoto A; Yato Y; Harada T; Mikami Y; Hase H; Kubo T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(8):E276-80. PubMed ID: 19365236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Morphometric studies of the ligamentum flavum: a correlative microanatomical and MRI study of the lumbar spine.
    Winkler PA; Zausinger S; Milz S; Buettner A; Wiesmann M; Tonn JC
    Zentralbl Neurochir; 2007 Nov; 68(4):200-4. PubMed ID: 17963193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Facet-sparing lumbar decompression with a minimally invasive flexible MicroBlade Shaver® versus traditional decompression: quantitative radiographic assessment.
    Lauryssen C; Berven S; Mimran R; Summa C; Sheinberg M; Miller LE; Block JE
    Clin Interv Aging; 2012; 7():257-66. PubMed ID: 22879740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The pathogenetic factors for neurogenic intermittent claudication caused by degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis].
    Zhou F; Dang G; Han Z
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1995 Mar; 33(3):140-3. PubMed ID: 7555379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Latest treatment of lumbar canal stenosis].
    Kim K; Isu T
    Brain Nerve; 2009 Jun; 61(6):655-62. PubMed ID: 19526832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nonsurgical and surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Yuan PS; Booth RE; Albert TJ
    Instr Course Lect; 2005; 54():303-12. PubMed ID: 15948458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinicopathological considerations in patients with lumbosacral extraforaminal stenosis.
    Song J; Lee JB; Suh JK
    J Clin Neurosci; 2009 May; 16(5):650-4. PubMed ID: 19251419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does the presence of the nerve root sedimentation sign on MRI correlate with the operative level in patients undergoing posterior lumbar decompression for lumbar stenosis?
    Fazal A; Yoo A; Bendo JA
    Spine J; 2013 Aug; 13(8):837-42. PubMed ID: 23562333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Results of decompressive-stabilizing procedures via unilateral approach in lumbar spinal stenosis].
    Krut'ko AV
    Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko; 2012; 76(2):33-40; discussion 40-1. PubMed ID: 22708433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modified minimally invasive-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under microscopic view to achieve bilateral decompression and fusion through a single approach to treat developmental lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Zhang F; Zhang W; Zhang R; Chen B; Shang X; Han J; Li X
    J Clin Neurosci; 2021 Feb; 84():46-49. PubMed ID: 33485598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis. Part I: Anatomical and surgical considerations.
    Spetzger U; Bertalanffy H; Naujokat C; von Keyserlingk DG; Gilsbach JM
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 1997; 139(5):392-6. PubMed ID: 9204106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interlaminar decompression in lumbar canal stenosis.
    Patond KR; Kakodia SC
    Neurol India; 1999 Dec; 47(4):286-9. PubMed ID: 10625900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.