These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Assessment of United States fertility clinic websites according to the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM)/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) guidelines. Abusief ME; Hornstein MD; Jain T; ; Fertil Steril; 2007 Jan; 87(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 17081534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What is the quality of information on social oocyte cryopreservation provided by websites of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology member fertility clinics? Avraham S; Machtinger R; Cahan T; Sokolov A; Racowsky C; Seidman DS Fertil Steril; 2014 Jan; 101(1):222-6. PubMed ID: 24140039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Veracity in in vitro fertilization Web pages. Cowan BD Fertil Steril; 2005 Mar; 83(3):548-9. PubMed ID: 15749477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology advertising guidelines: How are member clinics doing? Sauerbrun-Cutler MT; Brown EC; Huber WJ; Has P; Frishman GN Fertil Steril; 2021 Jan; 115(1):104-109. PubMed ID: 33069369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A study of undue pain and surfing: using hierarchical criteria to assess website quality. Lorence D; Abraham J Health Informatics J; 2008 Sep; 14(3):155-73. PubMed ID: 18775823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Information on the Internet about head injury pertaining to intensive care: less quantity and more quality is needed. Cheung BK; Morze CJ; Jones MA; Venkatesh B Crit Care Resusc; 2006 Jun; 8(2):100-6. PubMed ID: 16749874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving the transparency of health information found on the internet through the honcode: a comparative study. Laversin S; Baujard V; Gaudinat A; Simonet MA; Boyer C Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 169():654-8. PubMed ID: 21893829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How to evaluate the quality of health related websites. Gattoni F; Sicola C Radiol Med; 2005 Mar; 109(3):280-7. PubMed ID: 15775897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Extent, accuracy, and credibility of breastfeeding information on the Internet. Shaikh U; Scott BJ J Hum Lact; 2005 May; 21(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 15886343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing the quality of websites providing information on multiple sclerosis: evaluating tools and comparing sites. Harland J; Bath P Health Informatics J; 2007 Sep; 13(3):207-21. PubMed ID: 17711882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transparency of information on eye diseases on the internet. Lüchtenberg M; Ohrloff C; Schalnus R Ophthalmologica; 2009; 223(3):145-54. PubMed ID: 19096226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Internet information on head and neck oncology in French]. Evrard AS; Guertin L; Remacle M; Jamart J; Lévêque M Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 2009 Jun; 126(3):99-111. PubMed ID: 19515357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient-oriented methotrexate information sites on the Internet: a review of completeness, accuracy, format, reliability, credibility, and readability. Thompson AE; Graydon SL J Rheumatol; 2009 Jan; 36(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 19004031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The quality of internet-sourced information for patients with chronic pain is poor. Corcoran TB; Haigh F; Seabrook A; Schug SA Clin J Pain; 2009 Sep; 25(7):617-23. PubMed ID: 19692804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automated assessment of the quality of depression websites. Griffiths KM; Tang TT; Hawking D; Christensen H J Med Internet Res; 2005 Dec; 7(5):e59. PubMed ID: 16403723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]