These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15751148)
1. Heinrich v. Sweet. U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit Wests Fed Rep; 2002; 308():48-71. PubMed ID: 15751148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bibeau v. Pacific Northwest Research Foundation. U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Wests Fed Rep; 1999; 188():1105-115. PubMed ID: 15751151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Valdiviez v. United States. U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit Fed Report; 1989 Oct; 884():196-200. PubMed ID: 11648584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Expert testimony: a perspective from the trenches. Hawkins TS J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Feb; 2(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 17411781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Human experimentation at the brink of life. Oliver AA GMU Law Rev; 2001; 9(4):1177-203. PubMed ID: 15233133 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Discovery rule in medical malpractice under the Federal Tort Claims Act: the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Kubrick was not meant to be secondary authority. Zajdel C J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2004; 20(2):443-66. PubMed ID: 15239365 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Federal District Court declines to dismiss battery and malpractice claims. Meyers v. Epstein. Hosp Law Newsl; 2003 Aug; 20(10):4-6. PubMed ID: 12882043 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Bioethical malpractice: risk and responsibilities in human research. Noah BA J Health Care Law Policy; 2004; 7(2):175-241. PubMed ID: 15573441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Kassama v. Magat. Maryland. Court of Special Appeals Wests Atl Report; 2001; 767():348-69. PubMed ID: 16285103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Where Did Informed Consent for Research Come From? Capron AM J Law Med Ethics; 2018 Mar; 46(1):12-29. PubMed ID: 30008545 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Abram v. Children's Hospital of Buffalo. New York. Supreme Court, Appellate Division Wests N Y Suppl; 1989; 542():418-9. PubMed ID: 17083187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In re Cincinnati Radiation Litigation. U.S. District Court, Southern District of Ohio, Western Division Fed Suppl; 1995; 874():796-833. PubMed ID: 15751169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts v. Bellotti. U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit Fed Report; 1989 Feb; 868():459-73. PubMed ID: 11648577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Penn researchers sued in gene therapy death: teen's parents also name ethicist as defendant. Nelson D; Weiss R Washington Post; 2000 Sep; ():A3. PubMed ID: 11660806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Arato v. Avedon. California. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 3 Wests Calif Report; 1992 Aug; 11():169-88. PubMed ID: 11648615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Researcher liability for negligence in human subject research: informed consent and researcher malpractice actions. Jansson RL Wash Law Rev; 2003 Feb; 78(1):229-63. PubMed ID: 15732212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Thrombolysis (tissue plasminogen activator) in stroke: a medicolegal quagmire. Weintraub MI Stroke; 2006 Jul; 37(7):1917-22. PubMed ID: 16728683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Watching the watchdogs: negligence, liability, and research ethics boards. Gold JL Health Law J; 2003; 11():153-76. PubMed ID: 15600073 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]