BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

736 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15751212)

  • 1. [Comparison of indications for cesarean section in 1985-86 and 2000-01. Analysis of changes].
    Krychowska A; Kosińska K; Karwan-Płońska A
    Ginekol Pol; 2004 Dec; 75(12):926-31. PubMed ID: 15751212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Maternal and neonatal morbidity of emergency caesarean sections with a decision-to-delivery interval under 30 minutes: evidence from 10 years.
    Hillemanns P; Hasbargen U; Strauss A; Schulze A; Genzel-Boroviczeny O; Hepp H
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2003 Aug; 268(3):136-41. PubMed ID: 12883825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Evolution of indications for cesarean section between 1991 and 2000 in materials from the Pathology Clinic in the Department of Pregnancy and Labor, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin].
    Bilar M
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2003; 49():173-92. PubMed ID: 15552847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Indications for cesarean section and their outcome at the Hospital Center in Libreville].
    Picaud A; Nlome-Nze AR; Kouvahe V; Faye A; Ondo-Mve R
    Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1990 Jun; 85(6):393-8. PubMed ID: 2202041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rising trend and indications of caesarean section at the university of Maiduguri teaching hospital, Nigeria.
    Geidam AD; Audu BM; Kawuwa BM; Obed JY
    Ann Afr Med; 2009; 8(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 19805945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Analysis of the indications for the caesarean section delivery for very low birthweight neonates (< 1500 g) delivered in I department gynecology and obstetrics, Medical University in Lodz in 2006-2010].
    Brzozowska M; Kowalska-Koprek U; Kuś E; Berner-Trabska M; Karowicz-Bilińska A
    Ginekol Pol; 2011 Aug; 82(8):592-7. PubMed ID: 21957603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Cesarean delivery rate and indications in mainland China: a cross sectional study in 2011].
    Hou L; Li G; Zou L; Li C; Chen Y; Yuan Y; Wang X; Jia C; Zhang W
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 49(10):728-35. PubMed ID: 25537242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Clinical study of perinatal hysterectomy between 2000-2011 in the clinic of obstetrics, gynecological diseases and oncological gynecology in Bydgoszcz].
    Jagielska I; Kazdepka-Ziemińska A; Tyloch M; Papierski M; Zołniezewicz K; Grabiec M; Szymański W
    Ginekol Pol; 2014 Mar; 85(3):192-6. PubMed ID: 24783430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Indications for primary cesarean delivery relative to body mass index.
    Kawakita T; Reddy UM; Landy HJ; Iqbal SN; Huang CC; Grantz KL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):515.e1-9. PubMed ID: 27210064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Indications for caesarean section.
    Penn Z; Ghaem-Maghami S
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2001 Feb; 15(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 11359312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Cesarean birth: justifying indication or justified concern?].
    Muñoz-Enciso JM; Rosales-Aujang E; Domínguez-Ponce G; Serrano-Díaz CL
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2011 Feb; 79(2):67-74. PubMed ID: 21966786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Trends in indications for caesarean sections over 7 years in a Welsh district general hospital.
    Choudhury AP; Dawson AJ
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Nov; 29(8):714-7. PubMed ID: 19821664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Is the epidemic of cesarean sections the result of more liberal indications?].
    Stasiełuk A; Langowicz I; Kosińska-Kaczyńska K; Pietrzak B; Wielgoś M
    Ginekol Pol; 2012 Aug; 83(8):604-8. PubMed ID: 23342884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decision-to-incision times and maternal and infant outcomes.
    Bloom SL; Leveno KJ; Spong CY; Gilbert S; Hauth JC; Landon MB; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; O'sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Gabbe SG;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jul; 108(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 16816049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Disclosing suboptimal indications for emergency caesarean sections due to fetal distress and prolonged labor: a multicenter cross-sectional study at 12 public hospitals in Nepal.
    Litorp H; Gurung R; Målqvist M; Kc A
    Reprod Health; 2020 Dec; 17(1):197. PubMed ID: 33334355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Caesarean birth rates worldwide. A search for determinants.
    van Roosmalen J; van der Does CD
    Trop Geogr Med; 1995; 47(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 7747325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Characteristics of threats to pregnancy and labour in women over 39 y.o. in material of the District Hospital no. 2 in Rzeszów].
    Janeczko J; Mora-Janiszewska O; Ficek L
    Ginekol Pol; 2006 Jan; 77(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 16736957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Caesarean section survey in Galway--1973 through 1987.
    Bolaji II; Meehan FP
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1993 Jan; 48(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 8449255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modern indications for cesarean section.
    Mann LI; Gallant J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Oct; 135(4):437-41. PubMed ID: 484640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A descriptive analysis of the indications for caesarean section in mainland China.
    Liu Y; Li G; Chen Y; Wang X; Ruan Y; Zou L; Zhang W
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Dec; 14():410. PubMed ID: 25495550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 37.