These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15751477)

  • 1. Choice and response time processes in the identification and categorization of unidimensional stimuli.
    Lacouture Y; Marley AA
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Oct; 66(7):1206-26. PubMed ID: 15751477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A further test of sequential-sampling models that account for payoff effects on response bias in perceptual decision tasks.
    Diederich A
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):229-56. PubMed ID: 18372746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the relation between decision rules and perceptual representation in multidimensional perceptual categorization.
    Maddox WT; Bogdanov SV
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Jul; 62(5):984-97. PubMed ID: 10997044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning and attention in multidimensional identification and categorization: separating low-level perceptual processes and high-level decisional processes.
    Maddox WT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jan; 28(1):99-115. PubMed ID: 11827090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determinants of the benefit for consistent spatial mappings in dual-task performance of three-choice tasks.
    Proctor RW; Vu KP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1771-81. PubMed ID: 19933561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Base-rate effects in multidimensional perceptual categorization.
    Maddox WT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Mar; 21(2):288-301. PubMed ID: 7738501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stimulus-response compatibility effects in go-no-go tasks: a dimensional overlap account.
    Shiu LP; Kornblum S
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Nov; 61(8):1613-23. PubMed ID: 10598474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relative importance of perceptual and memory sampling processes in determining the time course of absolute identification.
    Guest D; Kent C; Adelman JS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(4):615-630. PubMed ID: 28967762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting similarity and categorization from identification.
    Ashby FG; Lee WW
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1991 Jun; 120(2):150-72. PubMed ID: 1830609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. One or two dimensions in spontaneous classification: a simplicity approach.
    Pothos EM; Close J
    Cognition; 2008 May; 107(2):581-602. PubMed ID: 18083157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of report order, identification method, and stimulus characteristics on multidimensional stimulus identification.
    Shieh KK; Lai CJ; Ellingstad VS
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Feb; 82(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 8668508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SLAM: a connectionist model for attention in visual selection tasks.
    Phaf RH; Van der Heijden AH; Hudson PT
    Cogn Psychol; 1990 Jul; 22(3):273-341. PubMed ID: 2376113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determinants of the benefit for consistent stimulus-response mappings in dual-task performance of four-choice tasks.
    Proctor RW; Vu KP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):734-56. PubMed ID: 19429956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative analysis of the categorization of multidimensional stimuli: I. Unidimensional classification does not necessarily imply analytic processing; evidence from pigeons (Columba livia), squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis), and humans (Homo sapiens).
    Wills AJ; Lea SE; Leaver LA; Osthaus B; Ryan CM; Suret MB; Bryant CM; Chapman SJ; Millar L
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 Nov; 123(4):391-405. PubMed ID: 19929108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Salience of stimulus and response features in choice-reaction tasks.
    Reeve TG; Proctor RW; Weeks DJ; Dornier L
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Oct; 52(4):453-60. PubMed ID: 1437478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors limiting large-scale localisation.
    Sterken Y; Toet A; Yap YL
    Perception; 1994; 23(6):709-26. PubMed ID: 7845763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sequence effects in categorization of simple perceptual stimuli.
    Stewart N; Brown GD; Chater N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jan; 28(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 11831211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection and identification: how are they related?
    Thomas JP
    J Opt Soc Am A; 1985 Sep; 2(9):1457-67. PubMed ID: 4045580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Categorization and decision-making in a neurobiologically plausible spiking network using a STDP-like learning rule.
    Beyeler M; Dutt ND; Krichmar JL
    Neural Netw; 2013 Dec; 48():109-24. PubMed ID: 23994510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Technique for estimating perceptual noise in categorization tasks.
    Alfonso-Reese LA
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2001 Nov; 33(4):489-95. PubMed ID: 11816452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.