These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15751477)

  • 21. Perceptual categorization: connectionist modelling and decision rules.
    Jones FW; Wills AJ; McLaren IP
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1998 Feb; 51(1):33-58. PubMed ID: 9532961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Stimulus-response compatibility with pure and mixed mappings in a flight task environment.
    Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2006 Dec; 12(4):207-22. PubMed ID: 17154770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Multidimensional stimulus identification: instructing subjects in the order of reporting stimulus dimensions.
    Shieh KK; Lai CJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1997 Jun; 84(3 Pt 1):995-1008. PubMed ID: 9172216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Decision criteria in dual discrimination tasks estimated using external-noise methods.
    Zak I; Katkov M; Gorea A; Sagi D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):1042-55. PubMed ID: 22351481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Processing of an irrelevant location dimension as a function of the relevant stimulus dimension.
    Lu CH; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Apr; 20(2):286-98. PubMed ID: 8189193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Success and failure at dual-task coordination by younger and older adults.
    Hartley AA; Maquestiaux F
    Psychol Aging; 2007 Jun; 22(2):215-22. PubMed ID: 17563177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Response times seen as decompression times in Boolean concept use.
    Bradmetz J; Mathy F
    Psychol Res; 2008 Mar; 72(2):211-34. PubMed ID: 17093950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Influence of typical size of objects in a categorization task].
    Ferrier L; Staudt A; Reilhac G; Jiménez M; Brouillet D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Dec; 61(4):316-21. PubMed ID: 18266507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Modeling response signal and response time data.
    Ratcliff R
    Cogn Psychol; 2006 Nov; 53(3):195-237. PubMed ID: 16890214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Integrated Bayesian models of learning and decision making for saccadic eye movements.
    Brodersen KH; Penny WD; Harrison LM; Daunizeau J; Ruff CC; Duzel E; Friston KJ; Stephan KE
    Neural Netw; 2008 Nov; 21(9):1247-60. PubMed ID: 18835129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Planning keypress and reaching responses: effects of response location and number of potential effectors.
    Adam JJ; Taminiau B; van Veen N; Ament B; Rijcken JM; Meijer K; Pratt J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1464-78. PubMed ID: 19045986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sensory discrimination: decision process.
    Johnson KO
    J Neurophysiol; 1980 Jun; 43(6):1771-92. PubMed ID: 6251182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Decision rules in the perception and categorization of multidimensional stimuli.
    Ashby FG; Gott RE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1988 Jan; 14(1):33-53. PubMed ID: 2963894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. On the dominance of unidimensional rules in unsupervised categorization.
    Ashby FG; Queller S; Berretty PM
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Aug; 61(6):1178-99. PubMed ID: 10497436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Perceptual separability, decisional separability, and the identification-speeded classification relationship.
    Maddox WT; Ashby FG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1996 Aug; 22(4):795-817. PubMed ID: 8756953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Object identification as a function of discriminability and learning presentations: the effect of stimulus similarity and canonical frame alignment on aircraft identification.
    Ashworth AR; Dror IE
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2000 Jun; 6(2):148-57. PubMed ID: 10937318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Performance-related activity in medial rostral prefrontal cortex (area 10) during low-demand tasks.
    Gilbert SJ; Simons JS; Frith CD; Burgess PW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):45-58. PubMed ID: 16478325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Further tests of an exemplar-similarity approach to relating identification and categorization.
    Nosofsky RM
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Apr; 45(4):279-90. PubMed ID: 2710628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of two diffusion process models in accounting for payoff and stimulus frequency manipulations.
    Leite FP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1366-82. PubMed ID: 22669791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Precueing spatial S-R correspondence: is there regulation of expected response conflict?
    Wühr P; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):872-83. PubMed ID: 18665732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.