BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15752336)

  • 1. Excision vs sponge swabbing - a comparison of methods for the microbiological sampling of beef, pork and lamb carcasses.
    Pearce RA; Bolton DJ
    J Appl Microbiol; 2005; 98(4):896-900. PubMed ID: 15752336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microbiological carcass sampling methods to achieve compliance with 2001/471/EC and new hygiene regulations.
    Byrne B; Dunne G; Lyng J; Bolton DJ
    Res Microbiol; 2005; 156(1):104-6. PubMed ID: 15636754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microbiological sampling of swine carcasses: a comparison of data obtained by swabbing with medical gauze and data collected routinely by excision at Swedish abattoirs.
    Lindblad M
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 Sep; 118(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 17706823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microbiological sampling of carcasses by excision or swabbing with three types of sponge or gauze.
    Martínez B; Celda MF; Anastasio B; García I; López-Mendoza MC
    J Food Prot; 2010 Jan; 73(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 20051208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microbial contamination on beef in relation to hygiene assessment based on criteria used in EU Decision 2001/471/EC.
    McEvoy JM; Sheridan JJ; Blair IS; McDowell DA
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2004 Apr; 92(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 15109799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experimental comparison of excision and swabbing microbiological sampling methods for carcasses.
    Pepperell R; Reid CA; Solano SN; Hutchison ML; Walters LD; Johnston AM; Buncic S
    J Food Prot; 2005 Oct; 68(10):2163-8. PubMed ID: 16245724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the SimPlate method for enumeration of Escherichia coli in swab samples from beef and lamb carcasses.
    Hauge SJ; Nesbakken T; Skjerve E; Dommarsnes K; Østensvik Ø
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2010 Aug; 142(1-2):229-33. PubMed ID: 20659776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationships between the density of different indicator organisms on sheep and beef carcasses and in frozen beef and sheep meat.
    Jordan D; Phillips D; Sumner J; Morris S; Jenson I
    J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Jan; 102(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 17184320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of destructive and nondestructive sampling techniques of retail chicken carcasses for enumeration of hygiene indicator microorganisms.
    Cossi MV; de Almeida MV; Dias MR; de Arruda Pinto PS; Nero LA
    J Food Prot; 2012 Jan; 75(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 22221352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The use of neck skin for microbial process control of fresh poultry meat using the bioluminescence method].
    Ellerbroek L; Lox C
    Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2004 May; 111(5):181-4. PubMed ID: 15233334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Proximate sources of bacteria on boneless loins prepared from routinely processed and detained carcasses at a pork packing plant.
    Gill CO; Landers C
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2004 Dec; 97(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 15541803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of wet-dry swabbing and excision sampling methods for microbiological testing of bovine, porcine, and ovine carcasses at red meat slaughterhouses.
    Hutchison ML; Walters LD; Avery SM; Reid CA; Wilson D; Howell M; Johnston AM; Buncic S
    J Food Prot; 2005 Oct; 68(10):2155-62. PubMed ID: 16245723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microbiological sampling of meat cuts and manufacturing beef by excision or swabbing.
    Gill CO; Badoni M; McGinnis JC
    J Food Prot; 2001 Mar; 64(3):325-34. PubMed ID: 11252475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characterization of the Arcobacter contamination on Belgian pork carcasses and raw retail pork.
    Van Driessche E; Houf K
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 Aug; 118(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 17588701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bifidobacteria as indicators of faecal contamination along a sheep meat production chain.
    Delcenserie V; Loncaric D; Bonaparte C; Upmann M; China B; Daube G; Gavini F
    J Appl Microbiol; 2008 Jan; 104(1):276-84. PubMed ID: 17922830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microbiological sampling of carcasses by excision or swabbing.
    Gill CO; Jones T
    J Food Prot; 2000 Feb; 63(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 10678419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two sampling techniques for game meat.
    van der Merwe M; Jooste PJ; Hoffman LC; Calitz FJ
    J S Afr Vet Assoc; 2013 Mar; 84(1):E1-6. PubMed ID: 23718896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Survival of Listeria innocua on hot and cold beef carcass surfaces.
    Prendergast DM; Rowe TA; Sheridan JJ
    J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Dec; 103(6):2721-9. PubMed ID: 17850304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enumeration of Salmonella and Escherichia coli O157:H7 in ground beef, cattle carcass, hide and faecal samples using direct plating methods.
    Brichta-Harhay DM; Arthur TM; Bosilevac JM; Guerini MN; Kalchayanand N; Koohmaraie M
    J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Nov; 103(5):1657-68. PubMed ID: 17953577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus-polymerase chain reaction to trace the fate of generic Escherichia coli within a high capacity pork slaughter line.
    Namvar A; Warriner K
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 Apr; 108(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 16386814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.