These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15752807)

  • 1. Development of an ultrasonic technique for in situ investigating the properties of deposited protein during crossflow ultrafiltration.
    Li J; Sanderson RD; Chai GY; Hallbauer DK
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2005 Apr; 284(1):228-38. PubMed ID: 15752807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fouling of nanofiltration, reverse osmosis, and ultrafiltration membranes by protein mixtures: the role of inter-foulant-species interaction.
    Wang YN; Tang CY
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Aug; 45(15):6373-9. PubMed ID: 21678956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fractionation of BSA and myoglobin with modified and unmodified ultrafiltration membranes.
    Ehsani N; Nyström M
    Bioseparation; 1995 Feb; 5(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 7766148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of protein surface morphology on the ultrafiltration flux resistance of bovine serum albumin.
    Elysée-Collen B; Lencki RW
    Biotechnol Prog; 1999; 15(4):732-9. PubMed ID: 10441365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative study of the effect of electromagnetic field on scale deposition on nanofiltration membranes via UTDR.
    Li J; Liu J; Yang T; Xiao C
    Water Res; 2007 Dec; 41(20):4595-610. PubMed ID: 17631375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative analysis of membrane fouling by protein mixtures using MALDI-MS.
    Chan R; Chen V; Bucknall MP
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2004 Jan; 85(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 14705002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of ion binding on protein transport through ultrafiltration membranes.
    Menon MK; Zydney AL
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1999 May; 63(3):298-307. PubMed ID: 10099609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Selective precipitation-assisted recovery of immunoglobulins from bovine serum using controlled-fouling crossflow membrane microfiltration.
    Venkiteshwaran A; Heider P; Teysseyre L; Belfort G
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2008 Dec; 101(5):957-66. PubMed ID: 18553503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Osmotically unresponsive water fraction on proteins: non-ideal osmotic pressure of bovine serum albumin as a function of pH and salt concentration.
    Fullerton GD; Kanal KM; Cameron IL
    Cell Biol Int; 2006 Jan; 30(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 16376113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors affecting the stability of O/W emulsion in BSA solution: stabilization by electrically neutral protein at high ionic strength.
    Rangsansarid J; Fukada K
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2007 Dec; 316(2):779-86. PubMed ID: 17897667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of protein fouling during ultrafiltration using a two-layer membrane model.
    Boyd RF; Zydney AL
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1998 Aug; 59(4):451-60. PubMed ID: 10099359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Membrane fouling and selectivity mechanisms in effluent ultrafiltration coupled with flocculation.
    Soffer Y; Ben Aim R; Adin A
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):123-34. PubMed ID: 16003970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of pH and ionic strength on the steric mass-action model parameters around the isoelectric point of protein.
    Shi Q; Zhou Y; Sun Y
    Biotechnol Prog; 2005; 21(2):516-23. PubMed ID: 15801792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of MFI-UF constant pressure, MFI-UF constant flux and Crossflow Sampler-Modified Fouling Index Ultrafiltration (CFS-MFI UF).
    Sim LN; Ye Y; Chen V; Fane AG
    Water Res; 2011 Feb; 45(4):1639-50. PubMed ID: 21194721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of a pore-blockage--cake-filtration model to protein fouling during microfiltration.
    Palacio L; Ho CC; Zydney AL
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2002 Aug; 79(3):260-70. PubMed ID: 12115414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Examination of cottage cheese whey proteins by scanning electron microscopy: relationship to membrane fouling during ultrafiltration.
    Lee DN; Merson RL
    J Dairy Sci; 1975 Oct; 58(10):1423-32. PubMed ID: 52661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurements and theoretical interpretation of points of zero charge/potential of BSA protein.
    Salis A; Boström M; Medda L; Cugia F; Barse B; Parsons DF; Ninham BW; Monduzzi M
    Langmuir; 2011 Sep; 27(18):11597-604. PubMed ID: 21834579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recovery of protein from poultry processing wastewater using membrane ultrafiltration.
    Lo YM; Cao D; Argin-Soysal S; Wang J; Hahm TS
    Bioresour Technol; 2005 Apr; 96(6):687-98. PubMed ID: 15588771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of aluminum speciation on fouling mechanisms by pre-coagulation/ultrafiltration process with different NOM fractions.
    Sun W; Nan J; Yao M; Xing J; Tian J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Sep; 23(17):17459-73. PubMed ID: 27230150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fractionation of proteins with modified membranes.
    Millesime L; Dulieu J; Chaufer B
    Bioseparation; 1996 Jun; 6(3):135-45. PubMed ID: 8987680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.