These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

487 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15754196)

  • 1. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume.
    De Backer D; Heenen S; Piagnerelli M; Koch M; Vincent JL
    Intensive Care Med; 2005 Apr; 31(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 15754196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pulse pressure variations adjusted by alveolar driving pressure to assess fluid responsiveness.
    Vallée F; Richard JC; Mari A; Gallas T; Arsac E; Verlaan PS; Chousterman B; Samii K; Genestal M; Fourcade O
    Intensive Care Med; 2009 Jun; 35(6):1004-10. PubMed ID: 19347330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pulse Pressure Variation Adjusted by Respiratory Changes in Pleural Pressure, Rather Than by Tidal Volume, Reliably Predicts Fluid Responsiveness in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
    Liu Y; Wei LQ; Li GQ; Yu X; Li GF; Li YM
    Crit Care Med; 2016 Feb; 44(2):342-51. PubMed ID: 26457754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predictive value of pulse pressure variation for fluid responsiveness in septic patients using lung-protective ventilation strategies.
    Freitas FG; Bafi AT; Nascente AP; Assunção M; Mazza B; Azevedo LC; Machado FR
    Br J Anaesth; 2013 Mar; 110(3):402-8. PubMed ID: 23161359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients ventilated with low tidal volume and high positive end-expiratory pressure.
    Huang CC; Fu JY; Hu HC; Kao KC; Chen NH; Hsieh MJ; Tsai YH
    Crit Care Med; 2008 Oct; 36(10):2810-6. PubMed ID: 18766099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The ability of pulse pressure variations obtained with CNAP™ device to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room.
    Biais M; Stecken L; Ottolenghi L; Roullet S; Quinart A; Masson F; Sztark F
    Anesth Analg; 2011 Sep; 113(3):523-8. PubMed ID: 21642606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How can the response to volume expansion in patients with spontaneous respiratory movements be predicted?
    Heenen S; De Backer D; Vincent JL
    Crit Care; 2006; 10(4):R102. PubMed ID: 16846530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of intra-abdominal pressure on the specificity of pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness.
    Royer P; Bendjelid K; Valentino R; Résière D; Chabartier C; Mehdaoui H
    J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2015 May; 78(5):994-9. PubMed ID: 25909421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pulse pressure variation and prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients ventilated with low tidal volumes.
    Oliveira-Costa CD; Friedman G; Vieira SR; Fialkow L
    Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2012 Jul; 67(7):773-8. PubMed ID: 22892922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of tidal volume on pulse pressure variations in hypovolemic ventilated pigs with acute respiratory distress-like syndrome.
    Wiklund CU; Morel DR; Orbring-Wiklund H; Romand JA; Piriou V; Teboul JL; Bendjelid K
    Anesthesiology; 2010 Sep; 113(3):630-8. PubMed ID: 20693877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Decrease in pulse pressure and stroke volume variations after mini-fluid challenge accurately predicts fluid responsiveness†.
    Mallat J; Meddour M; Durville E; Lemyze M; Pepy F; Temime J; Vangrunderbeeck N; Tronchon L; Thevenin D; Tavernier B
    Br J Anaesth; 2015 Sep; 115(3):449-56. PubMed ID: 26152341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Plethysmographic dynamic indices predict fluid responsiveness in septic ventilated patients.
    Feissel M; Teboul JL; Merlani P; Badie J; Faller JP; Bendjelid K
    Intensive Care Med; 2007 Jun; 33(6):993-9. PubMed ID: 17393139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Changes in Pulse Pressure Variation or Stroke Volume Variation After a "Tidal Volume Challenge" Reliably Predict Fluid Responsiveness During Low Tidal Volume Ventilation.
    Myatra SN; Prabu NR; Divatia JV; Monnet X; Kulkarni AP; Teboul JL
    Crit Care Med; 2017 Mar; 45(3):415-421. PubMed ID: 27922879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Online monitoring of pulse pressure variation to guide fluid therapy after cardiac surgery.
    Auler JO; Galas F; Hajjar L; Santos L; Carvalho T; Michard F
    Anesth Analg; 2008 Apr; 106(4):1201-6, table of contents. PubMed ID: 18349193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of pulse pressure variation validity criteria in critically ill patients: a prospective observational multicentre point-prevalence study.
    Mahjoub Y; Lejeune V; Muller L; Perbet S; Zieleskiewicz L; Bart F; Veber B; Paugam-Burtz C; Jaber S; Ayham A; Zogheib E; Lasocki S; Vieillard-Baron A; Quintard H; Joannes-Boyau O; Plantefève G; Montravers P; Duperret S; Lakhdari M; Ammenouche N; Lorne E; Slama M; Dupont H
    Br J Anaesth; 2014 Apr; 112(4):681-5. PubMed ID: 24374504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Change in cardiac output during Trendelenburg maneuver is a reliable predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in the prone position under protective ventilation.
    Yonis H; Bitker L; Aublanc M; Perinel Ragey S; Riad Z; Lissonde F; Louf-Durier A; Debord S; Gobert F; Tapponnier R; Guérin C; Richard JC
    Crit Care; 2017 Dec; 21(1):295. PubMed ID: 29208025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can dynamic indicators help the prediction of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing critically ill patients?
    Soubrier S; Saulnier F; Hubert H; Delour P; Lenci H; Onimus T; Nseir S; Durocher A
    Intensive Care Med; 2007 Jul; 33(7):1117-1124. PubMed ID: 17508201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of stroke volume variations obtained with the pressure recording analytic method.
    Biais M; Cottenceau V; Stecken L; Jean M; Ottolenghi L; Roullet S; Quinart A; Sztark F
    Crit Care Med; 2012 Apr; 40(4):1186-91. PubMed ID: 22425817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Passive leg-raising and end-expiratory occlusion tests perform better than pulse pressure variation in patients with low respiratory system compliance.
    Monnet X; Bleibtreu A; Ferré A; Dres M; Gharbi R; Richard C; Teboul JL
    Crit Care Med; 2012 Jan; 40(1):152-7. PubMed ID: 21926581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pulse pressure variation to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients: tidal vs. forced inspiratory breathing.
    Hong DM; Lee JM; Seo JH; Min JJ; Jeon Y; Bahk JH
    Anaesthesia; 2014 Jul; 69(7):717-22. PubMed ID: 24773446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.