484 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15754196)
1. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume.
De Backer D; Heenen S; Piagnerelli M; Koch M; Vincent JL
Intensive Care Med; 2005 Apr; 31(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 15754196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pulse pressure variations adjusted by alveolar driving pressure to assess fluid responsiveness.
Vallée F; Richard JC; Mari A; Gallas T; Arsac E; Verlaan PS; Chousterman B; Samii K; Genestal M; Fourcade O
Intensive Care Med; 2009 Jun; 35(6):1004-10. PubMed ID: 19347330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pulse Pressure Variation Adjusted by Respiratory Changes in Pleural Pressure, Rather Than by Tidal Volume, Reliably Predicts Fluid Responsiveness in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
Liu Y; Wei LQ; Li GQ; Yu X; Li GF; Li YM
Crit Care Med; 2016 Feb; 44(2):342-51. PubMed ID: 26457754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictive value of pulse pressure variation for fluid responsiveness in septic patients using lung-protective ventilation strategies.
Freitas FG; Bafi AT; Nascente AP; Assunção M; Mazza B; Azevedo LC; Machado FR
Br J Anaesth; 2013 Mar; 110(3):402-8. PubMed ID: 23161359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients ventilated with low tidal volume and high positive end-expiratory pressure.
Huang CC; Fu JY; Hu HC; Kao KC; Chen NH; Hsieh MJ; Tsai YH
Crit Care Med; 2008 Oct; 36(10):2810-6. PubMed ID: 18766099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The ability of pulse pressure variations obtained with CNAP™ device to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room.
Biais M; Stecken L; Ottolenghi L; Roullet S; Quinart A; Masson F; Sztark F
Anesth Analg; 2011 Sep; 113(3):523-8. PubMed ID: 21642606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How can the response to volume expansion in patients with spontaneous respiratory movements be predicted?
Heenen S; De Backer D; Vincent JL
Crit Care; 2006; 10(4):R102. PubMed ID: 16846530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of intra-abdominal pressure on the specificity of pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness.
Royer P; Bendjelid K; Valentino R; Résière D; Chabartier C; Mehdaoui H
J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2015 May; 78(5):994-9. PubMed ID: 25909421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pulse pressure variation and prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients ventilated with low tidal volumes.
Oliveira-Costa CD; Friedman G; Vieira SR; Fialkow L
Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2012 Jul; 67(7):773-8. PubMed ID: 22892922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of tidal volume on pulse pressure variations in hypovolemic ventilated pigs with acute respiratory distress-like syndrome.
Wiklund CU; Morel DR; Orbring-Wiklund H; Romand JA; Piriou V; Teboul JL; Bendjelid K
Anesthesiology; 2010 Sep; 113(3):630-8. PubMed ID: 20693877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Decrease in pulse pressure and stroke volume variations after mini-fluid challenge accurately predicts fluid responsiveness†.
Mallat J; Meddour M; Durville E; Lemyze M; Pepy F; Temime J; Vangrunderbeeck N; Tronchon L; Thevenin D; Tavernier B
Br J Anaesth; 2015 Sep; 115(3):449-56. PubMed ID: 26152341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Plethysmographic dynamic indices predict fluid responsiveness in septic ventilated patients.
Feissel M; Teboul JL; Merlani P; Badie J; Faller JP; Bendjelid K
Intensive Care Med; 2007 Jun; 33(6):993-9. PubMed ID: 17393139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Changes in Pulse Pressure Variation or Stroke Volume Variation After a "Tidal Volume Challenge" Reliably Predict Fluid Responsiveness During Low Tidal Volume Ventilation.
Myatra SN; Prabu NR; Divatia JV; Monnet X; Kulkarni AP; Teboul JL
Crit Care Med; 2017 Mar; 45(3):415-421. PubMed ID: 27922879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Online monitoring of pulse pressure variation to guide fluid therapy after cardiac surgery.
Auler JO; Galas F; Hajjar L; Santos L; Carvalho T; Michard F
Anesth Analg; 2008 Apr; 106(4):1201-6, table of contents. PubMed ID: 18349193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of pulse pressure variation validity criteria in critically ill patients: a prospective observational multicentre point-prevalence study.
Mahjoub Y; Lejeune V; Muller L; Perbet S; Zieleskiewicz L; Bart F; Veber B; Paugam-Burtz C; Jaber S; Ayham A; Zogheib E; Lasocki S; Vieillard-Baron A; Quintard H; Joannes-Boyau O; Plantefève G; Montravers P; Duperret S; Lakhdari M; Ammenouche N; Lorne E; Slama M; Dupont H
Br J Anaesth; 2014 Apr; 112(4):681-5. PubMed ID: 24374504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Change in cardiac output during Trendelenburg maneuver is a reliable predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in the prone position under protective ventilation.
Yonis H; Bitker L; Aublanc M; Perinel Ragey S; Riad Z; Lissonde F; Louf-Durier A; Debord S; Gobert F; Tapponnier R; Guérin C; Richard JC
Crit Care; 2017 Dec; 21(1):295. PubMed ID: 29208025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can dynamic indicators help the prediction of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing critically ill patients?
Soubrier S; Saulnier F; Hubert H; Delour P; Lenci H; Onimus T; Nseir S; Durocher A
Intensive Care Med; 2007 Jul; 33(7):1117-1124. PubMed ID: 17508201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of stroke volume variations obtained with the pressure recording analytic method.
Biais M; Cottenceau V; Stecken L; Jean M; Ottolenghi L; Roullet S; Quinart A; Sztark F
Crit Care Med; 2012 Apr; 40(4):1186-91. PubMed ID: 22425817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Passive leg-raising and end-expiratory occlusion tests perform better than pulse pressure variation in patients with low respiratory system compliance.
Monnet X; Bleibtreu A; Ferré A; Dres M; Gharbi R; Richard C; Teboul JL
Crit Care Med; 2012 Jan; 40(1):152-7. PubMed ID: 21926581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pulse pressure variation to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients: tidal vs. forced inspiratory breathing.
Hong DM; Lee JM; Seo JH; Min JJ; Jeon Y; Bahk JH
Anaesthesia; 2014 Jul; 69(7):717-22. PubMed ID: 24773446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
