These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15754206)

  • 1. The distribution of genetic parameter estimates and confidence intervals from small disconnected diallels.
    Isik F; Boos DD; Li B
    Theor Appl Genet; 2005 May; 110(7):1236-43. PubMed ID: 15754206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A simulation study of methods for constructing confidence intervals for bioaccumulation factors.
    Wheeler MW; Bailer AJ
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2003 Apr; 22(4):921-7. PubMed ID: 12685730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Confidence intervals for the 50 per cent response dose.
    Faraggi D; Izikson P; Reiser B
    Stat Med; 2003 Jun; 22(12):1977-88. PubMed ID: 12802816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative in silico analysis of SSRs in coding regions of high confidence predicted genes in Norway spruce (Picea abies) and Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda).
    Ranade SS; Lin YC; Van de Peer Y; García-Gil MR
    BMC Genet; 2015 Dec; 16():149. PubMed ID: 26706685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Calculating confidence intervals for prediction error in microarray classification using resampling.
    Jiang W; Varma S; Simon R
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2008; 7(1):Article8. PubMed ID: 18312213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in community-based cluster randomization trials with a binary outcome.
    Braschel MC; Svec I; Darlington GA; Donner A
    Clin Trials; 2016 Apr; 13(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 26415500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of REML and Gibbs sampling estimates of multi-trait genetic parameters in Scots pine.
    Waldmann P; Ericsson T
    Theor Appl Genet; 2006 May; 112(8):1441-51. PubMed ID: 16544126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of the bootstrap in analysing cost data from cluster randomised trials: some simulation results.
    Flynn TN; Peters TJ
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 Nov; 4(1):33. PubMed ID: 15550169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Leaf-level gas-exchange uniformity and photosynthetic capacity among loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) genotypes of contrasting inherent genetic variation.
    Aspinwall MJ; King JS; McKeand SE; Domec JC
    Tree Physiol; 2011 Jan; 31(1):78-91. PubMed ID: 21389004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nonparametric statistical methods for cost-effectiveness analyses.
    Dinh P; Zhou XH
    Biometrics; 2006 Jun; 62(2):576-88. PubMed ID: 16918923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Confidence intervals for the risk ratio under inverse sampling.
    Tian M; Tang ML; Ng HK; Chan PS
    Stat Med; 2008 Jul; 27(17):3301-24. PubMed ID: 18069723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Uncertainty of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. A comparison of Fieller and bootstrap confidence intervals.
    Severens JL; De Boo TM; Konst EM
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1999; 15(3):608-14. PubMed ID: 10874387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of the Fieller-Hinkley distribution of the ratio of random variables in testing for noninferiority.
    Koti KM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):215-28. PubMed ID: 17365219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inference for Surrogate Endpoint Validation in the Binary Case.
    Bebu I; Mathew T; Agan B
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(6):1272-84. PubMed ID: 25616958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methods for confidence interval estimation of a ratio parameter with application to location quotients.
    Beyene J; Moineddin R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Oct; 5():32. PubMed ID: 16221306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Constructing Confidence Intervals for Effect Size Measures of an Indirect Effect.
    Lee S; Lei MK; Brody GH
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(6):600-13. PubMed ID: 26717121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Asymptotic confidence intervals for the Pearson correlation via skewness and kurtosis.
    Bishara AJ; Li J; Nash T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 Feb; 71(1):167-185. PubMed ID: 28872186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving accuracy of genomic prediction by genetic architecture based priors in a Bayesian model.
    Gao N; Li J; He J; Xiao G; Luo Y; Zhang H; Chen Z; Zhang Z
    BMC Genet; 2015 Oct; 16():120. PubMed ID: 26466667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An alternative to Cohen's standardized mean difference effect size: a robust parameter and confidence interval in the two independent groups case.
    Algina J; Keselman HJ; Penfield RD
    Psychol Methods; 2005 Sep; 10(3):317-28. PubMed ID: 16221031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Under-smoothed kernel confidence intervals for the hazard ratio based on censored data.
    Tu D
    Biom J; 2007 Jun; 49(3):474-83. PubMed ID: 17623350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.