These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15754900)

  • 1. Why wasn't 'continuous treatment' doctrine applied? Case on point: Knox v. Greenville Hospital System, 2005 WL 20007 S.E.2d--SC.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2005 Jan; 45(8):2. PubMed ID: 15754900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Did deplorable nursing result in pyoderma gangrenosum? Case on point: Knight v. West Paces Ferry Hospital, Inc., 2003 WL 21384585 S.E.2d-GA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2003 Aug; 44(3):4. PubMed ID: 14508922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. RN fails to heed pt.'s order to 'stop:' suit for battery results. CASE ON POINT: King v. Dodge County Hospital Authority, No. A05A0497 (Ga.App. 06/27/2005).
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2005 Jul; 46(2):5. PubMed ID: 16121963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does the "continuous treatment" doctrine apply to hospitals? Case in point: Horton v. Carolina Medicorp, Inc. 460 S.E. 2d 567--NC (1995).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1995 Nov; 36(6):2. PubMed ID: 8552755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patients' word v. nurse's word: documentation. Case in point: Sheppard v. Kimbrough (318 S.E. 2d - SC).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1984 Nov; 25(6):4. PubMed ID: 6568727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Court 'capped' verdict for $2.2 million at $300,000. Chastain v. AnMed Health Foundation, 694 S.E.2d 541(6/16/2010)-SC.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 Nov; 51(6):4. PubMed ID: 21158266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. I.V. push of vesicants causes extravasation. Case on point: Iacano v. St. Peter's Medical Center, 334 N.J. Super. 547--NJ (2000).
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2000 Nov; 41(6):2. PubMed ID: 11995003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. CA: Did RN fail to document or monitor i.v.?: Nonsuit for lack of Dr.'s testimony re causation. Galvez v. Loma Linda University Medical Center, E047803 CAAPP4-2 (5/6/2010)-CA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 Aug; 51(3):3. PubMed ID: 21105314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Failure to determine breech position: M.D. or R.N. duty? Case in point: Alvis v. Henderson Obstetrics, S.C. (592 N.E.2d 678--[1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Sep; 33(4):4. PubMed ID: 1410395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Be careful where you 'stick' your patients. CASE ON POINT: Fricke v. Ochsner Hospital et al, No. 05CA868 (La. App. Cir. 5 05/24/ 06) -LA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2006 Sep; 47(4):2. PubMed ID: 17061680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hospital sues nurse for "indemnity" for damages.
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1997 Nov; 38(6):2. PubMed ID: 9444229
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can nurses testify as to 'dying declarations?'. Case of point: State v. McHoney, 2001 WL 283241 SE.2d - SC.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2001 May; 41(12):2. PubMed ID: 11995283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can nurses be compelled to testify against co-workers? Case in point: Cenkovich v. Almeida 634 N.E. 2d 30--IL (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Aug; 35(3):4. PubMed ID: 7938495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preparing a nurse for litigation.
    Teitlebaum C
    Ky Hosp Mag; 1991; 8(4):30-1. PubMed ID: 10115847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nurses failed to 'advocate' for their patient. Case on point: Rowe v. Sisters of Pallottine Missionary Society, 2001 WL 1585453 s.e.2d -WV.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2002 Jan; 42(8):2. PubMed ID: 15301071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vicarious liability for nurses: "borrowed servant" doctrine. Case in point: Parker v. Hosp. Auth. of City of Bainbridge 446 S.E.2d 766--GA (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Oct; 35(5):2. PubMed ID: 7816924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physicians not qualified as experts on nursing care. Case on point: Sullivan v. Edward Hospital, 2004 WL 228956 N.E.2d--IL.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2004 Mar; 44(10):4. PubMed ID: 15085702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Did RN botch placement of IV lines causing infection ? CASE ON POINT: Klein v. Norwalk Hospital, SC 18395 CTSC (12/21/2010)-CT.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2011 Feb; 51(9):4. PubMed ID: 21495469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Legal case briefs for nurses. N.Y.: incident reports: legal distinctions. AL.: hospital holds newborn for ransom.
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1987 Aug; 28(3):3. PubMed ID: 3650921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Failure to file suit timely: doctrine of Contra Non Valentem. Case in point: Wimberly v. Schumpert Med. Center 641 So. 2d 1016--LA (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Dec; 35(7):4. PubMed ID: 7838973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.