BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15755238)

  • 1. Illusions of competence in monitoring one's knowledge during study.
    Koriat A; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Mar; 31(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 15755238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Illusions of competence for phonetically, orthographically, and semantically similar word pairs.
    Tiede HL; Leboe JP
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Dec; 63(4):294-302. PubMed ID: 20025388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Illusions of competence during study can be remedied by manipulations that enhance learners' sensitivity to retrieval conditions at test.
    Koriat A; Bjork RA
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):959-72. PubMed ID: 17128596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How many dimensions underlie judgments of learning and recall? Evidence from state-trace methodology.
    Jang Y; Nelson TO
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):308-26. PubMed ID: 16131266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mending metacognitive illusions: a comparison of mnemonic-based and theory-based procedures.
    Koriat A; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):1133-45. PubMed ID: 16938051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Metacognition and mindreading: judgments of learning for Self and Other during self-paced study.
    Koriat A; Ackerman R
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):251-64. PubMed ID: 20096606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exploring a mnemonic debiasing account of the underconfidence-with-practice effect.
    Koriat A; Ma'ayan H; Sheffer L; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 May; 32(3):595-608. PubMed ID: 16719669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information: evidence for metacognitive illusions.
    Rhodes MG; Castel AD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):615-25. PubMed ID: 18999356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Item-specific and relational encoding are effective at reducing the illusion of competence.
    Maxwell NP; Cates EE; Huff MJ
    Psychol Res; 2024 Apr; 88(3):1023-1044. PubMed ID: 37926731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of categorical relatedness on judgements of learning (JOLs).
    Matvey G; Dunlosky J; Schwartz BL
    Memory; 2006 Feb; 14(2):253-61. PubMed ID: 16484114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Aging, encoding fluency, and metacognitive monitoring.
    Emanuel Robinson A; Hertzog C; Dunlosky J
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2006; 13(3-4):458-78. PubMed ID: 16887783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aging and monitoring associative learning: is monitoring accuracy spared or impaired?
    Hertzog C; Dunlosky J; Powell-Moman A; Kidder DP
    Psychol Aging; 2002 Jun; 17(2):209-25. PubMed ID: 12061407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Processing similarity does not improve metamemory: evidence against transfer-appropriate monitoring.
    Weaver CA; Kelemen WL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1058-65. PubMed ID: 14622046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The roles of cue and target familiarity in making feeling of knowing judgments.
    Leibert TW; Nelson DL
    Am J Psychol; 1998; 111(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 9624703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The interplay between value and relatedness as bases for metacognitive monitoring and control: evidence for agenda-based monitoring.
    Soderstrom NC; McCabe DP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1236-42. PubMed ID: 21574750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The memorizing effort heuristic in judgments of learning: a developmental perspective.
    Koriat A; Ackerman R; Lockl K; Schneider W
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Mar; 102(3):265-79. PubMed ID: 19084238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Metamemory judgments and the benefits of repeated study: improving recall predictions through the activation of appropriate knowledge.
    Tiede HL; Leboe JP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):822-8. PubMed ID: 19379052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recognition is used as one cue among others in judgment and decision making.
    Richter T; Späth P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):150-62. PubMed ID: 16478347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Why do judgments of learning modify memory? Evidence from identical pairs and relatedness judgments.
    Halamish V; Undorf M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Apr; 49(4):547-556. PubMed ID: 36006723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of delaying judgments of learning on metacognitive accuracy: a meta-analytic review.
    Rhodes MG; Tauber SK
    Psychol Bull; 2011 Jan; 137(1):131-48. PubMed ID: 21219059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.