These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15755238)
21. Monitoring memory errors: the influence of the veracity of retrieved information on the accuracy of judgements of learning. Rhodes MG; Tauber SK Memory; 2011 Nov; 19(8):853-70. PubMed ID: 21999219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A model for stochastic drift in memory strength to account for judgments of learning. Sikström S; Jönsson F Psychol Rev; 2005 Oct; 112(4):932-50. PubMed ID: 16262474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Illusions of competence and overestimation of associative memory for identical items: evidence from judgments of learning. Castel AD; McCabe DP; Roediger HL Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Feb; 14(1):107-11. PubMed ID: 17546739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Judgments of learning reflect encoding fluency: conclusive evidence for the ease-of-processing hypothesis. Undorf M; Erdfelder E J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1264-9. PubMed ID: 21574748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Judgments of Learning in Context: Backgrounds Can Both Reduce and Produce Metamemory Illusions. Tatz JR; Peynircioğlu ZF Mem Cognit; 2020 May; 48(4):581-595. PubMed ID: 31732926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comprehension as a basis for metacognitive judgments: effects of effort after meaning on recall and metacognition. Zaromb FM; Karpicke JD; Roediger HL J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):552-7. PubMed ID: 20192550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The effect of divided attention on global judgment of learning accuracy. Barnes KA; Dougherty MR Am J Psychol; 2007; 120(3):347-59. PubMed ID: 17892083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Source memory in the absence of successful cued recall. Cook GI; Marsh RL; Hicks JL J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):828-35. PubMed ID: 16822150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Predicting one's own forgetting: the role of experience-based and theory-based processes. Koriat A; Bjork RA; Sheffer L; Bar SK J Exp Psychol Gen; 2004 Dec; 133(4):643-56. PubMed ID: 15584811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparing objective and subjective learning curves: judgments of learning exhibit increased underconfidence with practice. Koriat A; Sheffer L; Ma'ayan H J Exp Psychol Gen; 2002 Jun; 131(2):147-62. PubMed ID: 12049237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Study for now, but judge for later: delayed judgments of learning promote long-term retention. Sundqvist ML; Todorov I; Kubik V; Jönsson FU Scand J Psychol; 2012 Dec; 53(6):450-4. PubMed ID: 22897518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Spacing one's study: evidence for a metacognitive control strategy. Son LK J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 May; 30(3):601-4. PubMed ID: 15099128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of the difficulty of prior items on the magnitude of judgments of learning for subsequent items. Richards RM; Nelson TO Am J Psychol; 2004; 117(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 15058858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Insight and strategy in multiple-cue learning. Lagnado DA; Newell BR; Kahan S; Shanks DR J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 May; 135(2):162-83. PubMed ID: 16719649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Metacognitive illusions for auditory information: effects on monitoring and control. Rhodes MG; Castel AD Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Jun; 16(3):550-4. PubMed ID: 19451383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect. Dunlosky J; Nelson TO Mem Cognit; 1992 Jul; 20(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 1495399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Age-related equivalence and deficit in knowledge updating of cue effectiveness. Matvey G; Dunlosky J; Shaw RJ; Parks C; Hertzog C Psychol Aging; 2002 Dec; 17(4):589-97. PubMed ID: 12507356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effects of prior knowledge on study-time allocation and free recall: investigating the discrepancy reduction model. Verkoeijen PP; Rikers RM; Schmidt HG J Psychol; 2005 Jan; 139(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 15751831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. On the role of causal intervention in multiple-cue judgment: positive and negative effects on learning. Enkvist T; Newell B; Juslin P; Olsson H J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):163-79. PubMed ID: 16478348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]