These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15755242)

  • 1. Outcome additivity and outcome maximality influence cue competition in human causal learning.
    Beckers T; De Houwer J; Pineño O; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Mar; 31(2):238-49. PubMed ID: 15755242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcome maximality and additivity training also influence cue competition in causal learning when learning involves many cues and events.
    Vandorpe S; De Houwer J; Beckers T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):356-68. PubMed ID: 17366305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Additivity pretraining and cue competition effects: developmental evidence for a reasoning-based account of causal learning.
    Simms V; McCormack T; Beckers T
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Apr; 38(2):180-90. PubMed ID: 22329707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Asymmetries in cue competition in forward and backward blocking designs: Further evidence for causal model theory.
    Booth SL; Buehner MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):387-99. PubMed ID: 17366307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Forward blocking in human learning sometimes reflects the failure to encode a cue-outcome relationship.
    Mitchell CJ; Lovibond PF; Minard E; Lavis Y
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 May; 59(5):830-44. PubMed ID: 16608749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Backward and forward blocking in human electrodermal conditioning: blocking requires an assumption of outcome additivity.
    Mitchell CJ; Lovibond PF
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2002 Oct; 55(4):311-29. PubMed ID: 12350284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Forward and backward blocking of causal judgment is enhanced by additivity of effect magnitude.
    Lovibond PE; Been SL; Mitchell CJ; Bouton ME; Frohardt R
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Jan; 31(1):133-42. PubMed ID: 12699149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing the deductive inferential account of blocking in causal learning.
    Livesey EJ; Greenaway JK; Schubert S; Thorwart A
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Aug; 47(6):1120-1132. PubMed ID: 30912035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of cue competition in a simple and a complex design.
    Vandorpe S; De Houwer J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):234-46. PubMed ID: 16405898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcome additivity, elemental processing and blocking in human causality judgements.
    Livesey EJ; Boakes RA
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2004 Oct; 57(4):361-79. PubMed ID: 15513261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recovery from blocking between outcomes.
    Wheeler DS; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):467-76. PubMed ID: 16248732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Associative history affects the associative change undergone by both presented and absent cues in human causal learning.
    LePelley ME; McLaren IP
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2004 Jan; 30(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 14709116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Within-compound associations in retrospective revaluation and in direct learning: a challenge for comparator theory.
    Melchers KG; Lachnit H; Shanks DR
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2004 Jan; 57(1):25-53. PubMed ID: 14690848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selective attention in human associative learning and recognition memory.
    Griffiths O; Mitchell CJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):626-48. PubMed ID: 18999357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Secondary task difficulty modulates forward blocking in human contingency learning.
    De Houwer J; Beckers T
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2003 Nov; 56(4):345-57. PubMed ID: 14578079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Competition between antecedent and between subsequent stimuli in causal judgments.
    Arcediano F; Matute H; Escobar M; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Mar; 31(2):228-37. PubMed ID: 15755241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The experimental task influences cue competition in human causal learning.
    Melchers KG; Ungör M; Lachnit H
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):477-83. PubMed ID: 16248733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Learning in a changing environment.
    Speekenbrink M; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 May; 139(2):266-98. PubMed ID: 20438252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The outcome specificity of learned predictiveness effects: parallels between human causal learning and animal conditioning.
    Le Pelley ME; Oakeshott SM; Wills AJ; McLaren IP
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Apr; 31(2):226-36. PubMed ID: 15839778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Positive and negative patterning in human causal learning.
    Young ME; Wasserman EA; Johnson JL; Jones FL
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2000 May; 53(2):121-38. PubMed ID: 10881604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.