BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

433 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15755324)

  • 21. The effect on incisional hernia of absorbable barbed suture for midline fascial closure in minimally invasive surgery for colorectal and gastric cancers: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Lee S; Han SW; Lee MR; Kim CY; Ha GW
    Trials; 2023 May; 24(1):311. PubMed ID: 37149610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A prospective comparative clinical study between monofilament absorbable and non-absorbable sutures for abdominal wall closure.
    Gys T; Hubens A
    Acta Chir Belg; 1989; 89(5):265-70. PubMed ID: 2530745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Design and current status of CONTINT: continuous versus interrupted abdominal wall closure after emergency midline laparotomy - a randomized controlled multicenter trial [NCT00544583].
    Rahbari NN; Knebel P; Kieser M; Bruckner T; Bartsch DK; Friess H; Mihaljevic AL; Stern J; Diener MK; Voss S; Rossion I; Büchler MW; Seiler CM
    Trials; 2012 May; 13():72. PubMed ID: 22647387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Postsurgical pain outcome of vertical and transverse abdominal incision: design of a randomized controlled equivalence trial [ISRCTN60734227].
    Reidel MA; Knaebel HP; Seiler CM; Knauer C; Motsch J; Victor N; Büchler MW
    BMC Surg; 2003 Nov; 3():9. PubMed ID: 14614782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Factors involved in abdominal wall closure and subsequent incisional hernia.
    O'Dwyer PJ; Courtney CA
    Surgeon; 2003 Feb; 1(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 15568420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. PREBIOUS trial: a multicenter randomized controlled trial of PREventive midline laparotomy closure with a BIOabsorbable mesh for the prevention of incisional hernia: rationale and design.
    López-Cano M; Pereira JA; Lozoya R; Feliu X; Villalobos R; Navarro S; Arbós MA; Armengol-Carrasco M
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2014 Nov; 39(2):335-41. PubMed ID: 25445313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Double-lock technique: a simple method to secure abdominal wall closure.
    Jategaonkar PA; Yadav SP
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2013 Aug; 23(8):581-2. PubMed ID: 23930876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Meta-analysis of suture techniques for midline abdominal incisions].
    Jin JB; Jiang ZP; Chen S
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Aug; 48(16):1256-61. PubMed ID: 21055218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Abdominal wound closure--a comparison of monofilament nylon and polyglycolic acid.
    Bucknall TE; Ellis H
    Surgery; 1981 Jun; 89(6):672-7. PubMed ID: 6264641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Polyglyconate (Maxon) versus nylon suture in midline abdominal incision closure: a prospective randomized trial.
    Carlson MA; Condon RE
    Am Surg; 1995 Nov; 61(11):980-3. PubMed ID: 7486431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Randomized clinical trial comparing polypropylene or polydioxanone for midline abdominal wall closure.
    Bloemen A; van Dooren P; Huizinga BF; Hoofwijk AG
    Br J Surg; 2011 May; 98(5):633-9. PubMed ID: 21254041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Laparotomy closure.
    Leaper DJ
    Br J Hosp Med; 1985 Jun; 33(6):317-22. PubMed ID: 3160421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Operative standardization in randomized controlled surgical trials. Meeting of the INSECT trial].
    Knaebel HP; Kirschner MH; Reidel MA; Büchler MW; Seiler CM
    Chirurg; 2006 Mar; 77(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 16496099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Laparotomy closure techniques: Do surgeons follow the latest guidelines? Results of a questionnaire.
    Bloemen A; De Kleijn RJCMF; Van Steensel S; Aarts F; Schreinemacher MHF; Bouvy ND
    Int J Surg; 2019 Nov; 71():110-116. PubMed ID: 31561005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A double blind randomized controlled trial comparing primary suture closure with mesh augmented closure to reduce incisional hernia incidence.
    Nieuwenhuizen J; Eker HH; Timmermans L; Hop WC; Kleinrensink GJ; Jeekel J; Lange JF;
    BMC Surg; 2013 Oct; 13():48. PubMed ID: 24499111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Comparative analysis of laparotomy closure techniques].
    Fedoseev AV; Inyutin AS; Zhanygulov AD; Muraviev SY; Vinogradov II
    Khirurgiia (Mosk); 2017; (6):37-40. PubMed ID: 28638012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Closure of the abdominal wall; how and why? Clinical review.
    Wadström J; Gerdin B
    Acta Chir Scand; 1990 Jan; 156(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 2181798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Incidence and prevention of ventral incisional hernia.
    Le Huu Nho R; Mege D; Ouaïssi M; Sielezneff I; Sastre B
    J Visc Surg; 2012 Oct; 149(5 Suppl):e3-14. PubMed ID: 23142402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Closure of abdominal wounds with continuous nonabsorbable sutures: experience in 1697 cases.
    Rubio PA
    Int Surg; 1991; 76(3):159-60. PubMed ID: 1938203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Monofilament versus multifilament absorbable sutures for abdominal closure.
    Sahlin S; Ahlberg J; Granström L; Ljungström KG
    Br J Surg; 1993 Mar; 80(3):322-4. PubMed ID: 8472140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.