These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15755711)

  • 21. Apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and atrial septal defect: part of a multi-organ syndrome?
    Pattoneri P; Pelà G; Astorri E; Borghetti A
    Eur J Echocardiogr; 2007 Jun; 8(3):226-9. PubMed ID: 16542879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reducing the costs of peer review.
    Nat Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 11(4):375. PubMed ID: 18368038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Appetite: peer-reviewed research across the disciplines.
    Booth D
    Appetite; 2008 Sep; 51(2):231-2. PubMed ID: 18455264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. How does peer review work?
    Aaron L
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Peer review is complicated.
    Goodlin RC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 192(5):1760. PubMed ID: 15902192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Experimenting with peer review.
    Jabri E
    ACS Chem Biol; 2006 Jul; 1(6):325-6. PubMed ID: 17163762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy mimicking acute coronary syndrome: a case report and review of the literature.
    Olearczyk B; Gollol-Raju N; Menzies DJ
    Angiology; 2008; 59(5):629-31. PubMed ID: 18388083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Genetics of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: one, two, or more diseases?
    Bos JM; Ommen SR; Ackerman MJ
    Curr Opin Cardiol; 2007 May; 22(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 17413275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Training and experience of peer reviewers: an additional variable to consider.
    Kulstad E
    PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e143; author reply e145. PubMed ID: 17388681
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Molecular genetics in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: towards individualized management of the disease.
    Charron P; Komajda M
    Expert Rev Mol Diagn; 2006 Jan; 6(1):65-78. PubMed ID: 16359268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A perspective on perspectives.
    Hughes IA
    Arch Dis Child; 2005 Aug; 90(8):771. PubMed ID: 16040867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Veterinary pathology and peer review.
    Cantor GH; Caswell JL; Crissman JW; Gillette DM; Gunson DE; Hogenesch H; Kiupel M; Mense MG; Miller MA; Rush LJ; Leger JA; Schoeb TR; Sellers RS; Sills RC; Swayne DE; Thomas HC; Ward JM; Alden CL
    Vet Pathol; 2009 Mar; 46(2):173-5. PubMed ID: 19261628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Addressing conflicts of interest and clouding of objectivity: BJSM's "peer review: fair review" section.
    Khan KM; Stovitz SD; Pluim B; Cook JL; Bahr R; Arendt EA; Noakes TD
    Br J Sports Med; 2008 Feb; 42(2):79. PubMed ID: 18256294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Chiropractic magazines.
    Hart JF
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1993 Sep; 16(7):508-9. PubMed ID: 8228653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Global cardiovascular disease research survey.
    Prabhakaran P; Ajay VS; Prabhakaran D; Gottumukkala AK; Shrihari JS; Snehi U; Joseph B; Reddy KS
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 Dec; 50(24):2322-8. PubMed ID: 18068042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Peer review: the weakest link.
    Demaria AN
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2010 Mar; 55(11):1161-2. PubMed ID: 20223373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Peer review--the newcomers' perspective.
    Mainguy G; Motamedi MR; Mietchen D
    PLoS Biol; 2005 Sep; 3(9):e326. PubMed ID: 16149851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. BJCVS on track to Medline.
    Braile D
    Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc; 2007; 22(1):I-II. PubMed ID: 17992294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The discourteous reviewer.
    Leviton A
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 21(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 17239173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. How to cope with manuscript rejection.
    Peregrin T
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2007 Feb; 107(2):190, 192-3. PubMed ID: 17258951
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.