BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15755945)

  • 21. Enabling health care decisionmaking through clinical decision support and knowledge management.
    Lobach D; Sanders GD; Bright TJ; Wong A; Dhurjati R; Bristow E; Bastian L; Coeytaux R; Samsa G; Hasselblad V; Williams JW; Wing L; Musty M; Kendrick AS
    Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep); 2012 Apr; (203):1-784. PubMed ID: 23126650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Features predicting the success of computerized decision support for prescribing: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
    Mollon B; Chong J; Holbrook AM; Sung M; Thabane L; Foster G
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2009 Feb; 9():11. PubMed ID: 19210782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A review of randomized controlled trials of medical record powered clinical decision support system to improve quality of diabetes care.
    Ali SM; Giordano R; Lakhani S; Walker DM
    Int J Med Inform; 2016 Mar; 87():91-100. PubMed ID: 26806716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Do computerized clinical decision support systems improve the prescribing of oral anticoagulants? A systematic review.
    Sennesael AL; Krug B; Sneyers B; Spinewine A
    Thromb Res; 2020 Mar; 187():79-87. PubMed ID: 31972381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects and characteristics of clinical decision support systems on the outcomes of patients with kidney disease: a systematic review.
    Mirpanahi N; Nabovati E; Sharif R; Amirazodi S; Karami M
    Hosp Pract (1995); 2023 Aug; 51(3):110-123. PubMed ID: 37068105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Computerized clinical decision support systems for primary preventive care: a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review of effects on process of care and patient outcomes.
    Souza NM; Sebaldt RJ; Mackay JA; Prorok JC; Weise-Kelly L; Navarro T; Wilczynski NL; Haynes RB;
    Implement Sci; 2011 Aug; 6():87. PubMed ID: 21824381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of clinical decision support systems for diabetes care: An overview of current evidence.
    Jia P; Zhao P; Chen J; Zhang M
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2019 Feb; 25(1):66-77. PubMed ID: 29947136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of computer-aided clinical decision support systems in improving antibiotic prescribing by primary care providers: a systematic review.
    Holstiege J; Mathes T; Pieper D
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2015 Jan; 22(1):236-42. PubMed ID: 25125688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of electronic medical record-based clinical decision support on HIV care in resource-constrained settings: a systematic review.
    Oluoch T; Santas X; Kwaro D; Were M; Biondich P; Bailey C; Abu-Hanna A; de Keizer N
    Int J Med Inform; 2012 Oct; 81(10):e83-92. PubMed ID: 22921485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Interventions to improve the management of diabetes mellitus in primary health care and outpatient community settings].
    Hansen LJ; Drivsholm TB
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Jan; 164(5):607-9. PubMed ID: 11871208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of clinical decision-support systems: a systematic review.
    Bright TJ; Wong A; Dhurjati R; Bristow E; Bastian L; Coeytaux RR; Samsa G; Hasselblad V; Williams JW; Musty MD; Wing L; Kendrick AS; Sanders GD; Lobach D
    Ann Intern Med; 2012 Jul; 157(1):29-43. PubMed ID: 22751758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of computerised, knowledge-based, clinical decision support systems on patient-reported and clinical outcomes of patients with chronic disease managed in primary care settings: a systematic review.
    El Asmar ML; Dharmayat KI; Vallejo-Vaz AJ; Irwin R; Mastellos N
    BMJ Open; 2021 Dec; 11(12):e054659. PubMed ID: 34937723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Do providers use computerized clinical decision support systems? A systematic review and meta-regression of clinical decision support uptake.
    Kouri A; Yamada J; Lam Shin Cheung J; Van de Velde S; Gupta S
    Implement Sci; 2022 Mar; 17(1):21. PubMed ID: 35272667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Computer decision support systems for asthma: a systematic review.
    Matui P; Wyatt JC; Pinnock H; Sheikh A; McLean S
    NPJ Prim Care Respir Med; 2014 May; 24():14005. PubMed ID: 24841952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Computerized clinical decision support systems for acute care management: a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review of effects on process of care and patient outcomes.
    Sahota N; Lloyd R; Ramakrishna A; Mackay JA; Prorok JC; Weise-Kelly L; Navarro T; Wilczynski NL; Haynes RB;
    Implement Sci; 2011 Aug; 6():91. PubMed ID: 21824385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Association of Clinician Diagnostic Performance With Machine Learning-Based Decision Support Systems: A Systematic Review.
    Vasey B; Ursprung S; Beddoe B; Taylor EH; Marlow N; Bilbro N; Watkinson P; McCulloch P
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Mar; 4(3):e211276. PubMed ID: 33704476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of chemotherapy prescription clinical decision-support systems on the chemotherapy process: A systematic review.
    Rahimi R; Moghaddasi H; Rafsanjani KA; Bahoush G; Kazemi A
    Int J Med Inform; 2019 Feb; 122():20-26. PubMed ID: 30623780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 66.