357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15756521)
1. Dose to bone marrow using IMRT techniques in prostate cancer patients.
Gershkevitsh E; Clark CH; Staffurth J; Dearnaley DP; Trott KR
Strahlenther Onkol; 2005 Mar; 181(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 15756521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy improves lymph node coverage and dose to critical structures compared with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized prostate cancer.
Wang-Chesebro A; Xia P; Coleman J; Akazawa C; Roach M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Nov; 66(3):654-62. PubMed ID: 17011444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Persistently better treatment planning results of intensity-modulated (IMRT) over conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) in prostate cancer patients with significant variation of clinical target volume and/or organs-at-risk.
Fenoglietto P; Laliberte B; Allaw A; Ailleres N; Idri K; Hay MH; Moscardo CL; Gourgou S; Dubois JB; Azria D
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jul; 88(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 18215434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pelvic nodal dose escalation with prostate hypofractionation using conformal avoidance defined (H-CAD) intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Hong TS; Tomé WA; Jaradat H; Raisbeck BM; Ritter MA
Acta Oncol; 2006; 45(6):717-27. PubMed ID: 16938815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Importance of protocol target definition on the ability to spare normal tissue: an IMRT and 3D-CRT planning comparison for intraorbital tumors.
Hein PA; Gladstone DJ; Bellerive MR; Hug EB
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Aug; 62(5):1540-8. PubMed ID: 16029816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetry and radiobiologic model comparison of IMRT and 3D conformal radiotherapy in treatment of carcinoma of the prostate.
Luxton G; Hancock SL; Boyer AL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 May; 59(1):267-84. PubMed ID: 15093924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma of the thigh.
Hong L; Alektiar KM; Hunt M; Venkatraman E; Leibel SA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jul; 59(3):752-9. PubMed ID: 15183478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of benchmark dose-volume histograms for selection of the optimal technique between three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy in prostate cancer.
Luo C; Yang CC; Narayan S; Stern RL; Perks J; Goldberg Z; Ryu J; Purdy JA; Vijayakumar S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Nov; 66(4):1253-62. PubMed ID: 17145540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dosimetric comparison of bone marrow-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conventional techniques for treatment of cervical cancer.
Mell LK; Tiryaki H; Ahn KH; Mundt AJ; Roeske JC; Aydogan B
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Aug; 71(5):1504-10. PubMed ID: 18640499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dosimetric advantages of IMRT simultaneous integrated boost for high-risk prostate cancer.
Li XA; Wang JZ; Jursinic PA; Lawton CA; Wang D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(4):1251-7. PubMed ID: 15752907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) vs. serial tomotherapy, step-and-shoot IMRT and 3D-conformal RT for treatment of prostate cancer.
Wolff D; Stieler F; Welzel G; Lorenz F; Abo-Madyan Y; Mai S; Herskind C; Polednik M; Steil V; Wenz F; Lohr F
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Nov; 93(2):226-33. PubMed ID: 19765846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dose heterogeneity in the target volume and intensity-modulated radiotherapy to escalate the dose in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.
Schwarz M; Alber M; Lebesque JV; Mijnheer BJ; Damen EM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jun; 62(2):561-70. PubMed ID: 15890601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative treatment planning on localized prostate carcinoma conformal photon- versus proton-based radiotherapy.
Mock U; Bogner J; Georg D; Auberger T; Pötter R
Strahlenther Onkol; 2005 Jul; 181(7):448-55. PubMed ID: 15995838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pilot study of conformal intensity modulated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer.
Aillères N; Azria D; Thézenas S; Barbier N; Fenoglietto P; Delard R; Hay MH; Dubois JB
Cancer Radiother; 2004 Apr; 8(2):59-69. PubMed ID: 15063872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the dosimetric impact of non-exclusion of the rectum from the boost PTV in IMRT treatment plans for prostate cancer patients.
Kassim I; Dirkx ML; Heijmen BJ
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Jul; 92(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 19278745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is IMRT needed to spare the rectum when pelvic lymph nodes are part of the initial treatment volume for prostate cancer?
Sanguineti G; Cavey ML; Endres EJ; Brandon GG; Bayouth JE
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):151-60. PubMed ID: 16198066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric and radiobiologic comparison of 3D conformal versus intensity modulated planning techniques for prostate bed radiotherapy.
Koontz BF; Das S; Temple K; Bynum S; Catalano S; Koontz JI; Montana GS; Oleson JR
Med Dosim; 2009; 34(3):256-60. PubMed ID: 19647638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is intensity-modulated radiotherapy better than conventional radiation treatment and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for mediastinal masses in patients with Hodgkin's disease, and is there a role for beam orientation optimization and dose constraints assigned to virtual volumes?
Girinsky T; Pichenot C; Beaudre A; Ghalibafian M; Lefkopoulos D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):218-26. PubMed ID: 16169675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
