1162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15757052)
1. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy.
Balch GC; Mithani SK; Simpson JF; Kelley MC
Am Surg; 2005 Jan; 71(1):22-7; discussion 27-8. PubMed ID: 15757052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.
Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Sahin AA; Kuerer HM; Babiera GV; Singletary SE; Whitman GJ; Ross MI; Ames FC; Feig BW; Buchholz TA; Meric-Bernstam F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1458-71. PubMed ID: 17260108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence.
Olson TP; Harter J; Muñoz A; Mahvi DM; Breslin T
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2953-60. PubMed ID: 17674109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Defining negative margins in DCIS patients treated with breast conservation therapy: The University of Chicago experience.
Sahoo S; Recant WM; Jaskowiak N; Tong L; Heimann R
Breast J; 2005; 11(4):242-7. PubMed ID: 15982389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Association of clinical and pathologic variables with lumpectomy surgical margin status after preoperative diagnosis or excisional biopsy of invasive breast cancer.
Smitt MC; Horst K
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1040-4. PubMed ID: 17203329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The relationship between shaved margin and inked margin status in breast excision specimens.
Guidi AJ; Connolly JL; Harris JR; Schnitt SJ
Cancer; 1997 Apr; 79(8):1568-73. PubMed ID: 9118040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer.
Aziz D; Rawlinson E; Narod SA; Sun P; Lickley HL; McCready DR; Holloway CM
Breast J; 2006; 12(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 16848842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intraoperative touch preparation cytology for margin assessment in breast-conservation surgery: does it work for lobular carcinoma?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Ali I; Feldman SM; Cohen JM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2940-5. PubMed ID: 17632761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast with close or focally involved margins following breast-conserving surgery: treatment with reexcision or radiotherapy with increased dosage.
Monteau A; Sigal-Zafrani B; Kirova YM; Fourchotte V; Bollet MA; Vincent-Salomon A; Asselain B; Salmon RJ; Fourquet A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Nov; 75(4):1021-8. PubMed ID: 19386441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of margin status in lumpectomy specimens and residual breast carcinoma.
Scopa CD; Aroukatos P; Tsamandas AC; Aletra C
Breast J; 2006; 12(2):150-3. PubMed ID: 16509840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of margins on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast conservation therapy for lymph node-negative breast carcinoma.
Leong C; Boyages J; Jayasinghe UW; Bilous M; Ung O; Chua B; Salisbury E; Wong AY
Cancer; 2004 May; 100(9):1823-32. PubMed ID: 15112262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microinvasive breast carcinoma: clinicopathologic analysis of a single institution experience.
Padmore RF; Fowble B; Hoffman J; Rosser C; Hanlon A; Patchefsky AS
Cancer; 2000 Mar; 88(6):1403-9. PubMed ID: 10717623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 259 Patients with DCIS of the breast applying USC/Van Nuys prognostic index: a retrospective review with long term follow up.
Di Saverio S; Catena F; Santini D; Ansaloni L; Fogacci T; Mignani S; Leone A; Gazzotti F; Gagliardi S; De Cataldis A; Taffurelli M
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Jun; 109(3):405-16. PubMed ID: 17687650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Negative margin status improves local control in conservatively managed breast cancer patients.
Obedian E; Haffty BG
Cancer J Sci Am; 2000; 6(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 10696736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of lobular carcinoma in situ in association with invasive breast cancer on the rate of local recurrence in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy.
Jolly S; Kestin LL; Goldstein NS; Vicini FA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Oct; 66(2):365-71. PubMed ID: 16965988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Local recurrence of ductal carcinoma in situ after skin-sparing mastectomy.
Carlson GW; Page A; Johnson E; Nicholson K; Styblo TM; Wood WC
J Am Coll Surg; 2007 May; 204(5):1074-8; discussion 1078-80. PubMed ID: 17481544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does the volume of ductal carcinoma in situ impact the positive margin rate in patients undergoing breast conservation for invasive breast cancer?
Martin-Dunlap TM; Cyr AE; Al Mushawah F; Gao F; Margenthaler JA
J Surg Res; 2013 Sep; 184(1):228-33. PubMed ID: 23688789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ductal carcinoma in situ. The success of breast conservation therapy: a shared experience of two single institutional nonrandomized prospective studies.
Lagios MD; Silverstein MJ
Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 1997 Apr; 6(2):385-92. PubMed ID: 9115503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimal use of re-excision in patients diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer by excisional biopsy treated with breast-conserving therapy.
Caughran JL; Vicini FA; Kestin LL; Dekhne NS; Benitez PR; Goldstein NS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Nov; 16(11):3020-7. PubMed ID: 19636632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
