294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15758862)
1. Avoidance of multiple pregnancy by use of single embryo transfer.
Hamberger L; Hardarson T; Nygren KG
Minerva Ginecol; 2005 Feb; 57(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 15758862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Attitudes towards single embryo transfer, twin and higher order pregnancies in patients undergoing infertility treatment: a review.
Leese B; Denton J
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2010 Mar; 13(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 20141337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reducing twin pregnancy rates after IVF--elective single embryo transfer (eSET).
Milne P; Cottell E; Allen C; Spillane H; Vasallo J; Wingfield M
Ir Med J; 2010 Jan; 103(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 20222385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Elective single embryo transfer: a 6-year progressive implementation of 784 single blastocyst transfers and the influence of payment method on patient choice.
Stillman RJ; Richter KS; Banks NK; Graham JR
Fertil Steril; 2009 Dec; 92(6):1895-906. PubMed ID: 18976755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Elective single embryo transfer (eSET) policy in the first three IVF/ICSI treatment cycles.
van Montfoort AP; Dumoulin JC; Land JA; Coonen E; Derhaag JG; Evers JL
Hum Reprod; 2005 Feb; 20(2):433-6. PubMed ID: 15550492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Elective single-embryo transfer in women aged 40-44 years.
Niinimäki M; Suikkari AM; Mäkinen S; Söderström-Anttila V; Martikainen H
Hum Reprod; 2013 Feb; 28(2):331-5. PubMed ID: 23175499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Elective single embryo transfer with cryopreservation improves the outcome and diminishes the costs of IVF/ICSI.
Veleva Z; Karinen P; Tomás C; Tapanainen JS; Martikainen H
Hum Reprod; 2009 Jul; 24(7):1632-9. PubMed ID: 19318704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In unselected patients, elective single embryo transfer prevents all multiples, but results in significantly lower pregnancy rates compared with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial.
van Montfoort AP; Fiddelers AA; Janssen JM; Derhaag JG; Dirksen CD; Dunselman GA; Land JA; Geraedts JP; Evers JL; Dumoulin JC
Hum Reprod; 2006 Feb; 21(2):338-43. PubMed ID: 16253973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Elective single embryo transfer in women aged 36-39 years.
Veleva Z; Vilska S; Hydén-Granskog C; Tiitinen A; Tapanainen JS; Martikainen H
Hum Reprod; 2006 Aug; 21(8):2098-102. PubMed ID: 16740524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Single versus double embryo transfer: cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomized clinical trial.
Fiddelers AA; van Montfoort AP; Dirksen CD; Dumoulin JC; Land JA; Dunselman GA; Janssen JM; Severens JL; Evers JL
Hum Reprod; 2006 Aug; 21(8):2090-7. PubMed ID: 16613886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Elective single embryo transfer in assisted reproduction].
Ertzeid G; Fedorcsak P; Abyholm T; Tanbo T
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Nov; 126(23):3101-2. PubMed ID: 17160114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. eSET irrespective of the availability of a good-quality embryo in the first cycle only is not effective in reducing overall twin pregnancy rates.
van Montfoort AP; Fiddelers AA; Land JA; Dirksen CD; Severens JL; Geraedts JP; Evers JL; Dumoulin JC
Hum Reprod; 2007 Jun; 22(6):1669-74. PubMed ID: 17416915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multiple gestation pregnancy. The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group.
Hum Reprod; 2000 Aug; 15(8):1856-64. PubMed ID: 10920117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Determinants of the choice for single or double embryo transfer in twin prone couples.
Van Peperstraten AM; Kreuwel IA; Hermens RP; Nelen WL; Van Dop PA; Grol RP; Kremer JA
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(2):226-31. PubMed ID: 18231893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Economic evaluations of single- versus double-embryo transfer in IVF.
Fiddelers AA; Severens JL; Dirksen CD; Dumoulin JC; Land JA; Evers JL
Hum Reprod Update; 2007; 13(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 17099208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Why don't we perform elective single embryo transfer? A qualitative study among IVF patients and professionals.
van Peperstraten AM; Nelen WL; Hermens RP; Jansen L; Scheenjes E; Braat DD; Grol RP; Kremer JA
Hum Reprod; 2008 Sep; 23(9):2036-42. PubMed ID: 18565969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What about the remaining twins since single-embryo transfer? How far can (should) we go?
De Neubourg D; Gerris J
Hum Reprod; 2006 Apr; 21(4):843-6. PubMed ID: 16410338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Single-embryo transfer.
Dhont M
Semin Reprod Med; 2001 Sep; 19(3):251-8. PubMed ID: 11679906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Establishment of criteria for elective single embryo transfer at day 2 or day 3 by analyzing cases with successful implantation of all embryos transferred.
Shibahara H; Hirano Y; Okajima T; Shimada K; Kikuchi K; Suzuki T; Takamizawa S; Suzuki M
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2007 Aug; 33(4):501-5. PubMed ID: 17688618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Transfer of single embryo as a method to reduce twins pregnancy rate in in-vitro fertilization treatment].
Ravhon A; Hurwitz A
Harefuah; 2002 Mar; 141(3):301-5, 312. PubMed ID: 11944228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
