249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15759219)
1. Team functioning and patient outcomes in stroke rehabilitation.
Strasser DC; Falconer JA; Herrin JS; Bowen SE; Stevens AB; Uomoto J
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Mar; 86(3):403-9. PubMed ID: 15759219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Toward spanning the quality chasm: an examination of team functioning measures.
Strasser DC; Burridge AB; Falconer JA; Uomoto JM; Herrin J
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Nov; 95(11):2220-3. PubMed ID: 25007707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Team training and stroke rehabilitation outcomes: a cluster randomized trial.
Strasser DC; Falconer JA; Stevens AB; Uomoto JM; Herrin J; Bowen SE; Burridge AB
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Jan; 89(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 18164324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measuring team process for quality improvement.
Strasser DC; Burridge AB; Falconer JA; Herrin J; Uomoto J
Top Stroke Rehabil; 2010; 17(4):282-93. PubMed ID: 20826416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inpatient rehabilitation after stroke: a comparison of lengths of stay and outcomes in the Veterans Affairs and non-Veterans Affairs health care system.
Stineman MG; Ross RN; Hamilton BB; Maislin G; Bates B; Granger CV; Asch DA
Med Care; 2001 Feb; 39(2):123-37. PubMed ID: 11176550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient-focused rehabilitation team cohesiveness in veterans administration hospitals.
Smits SJ; Falconer JA; Herrin J; Bowen SE; Strasser DC
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Sep; 84(9):1332-8. PubMed ID: 13680570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Length of stay, discharge destination, and functional improvement: utility of the Australian National Subacute and Nonacute Patient Casemix Classification.
Tooth L; McKenna K; Goh K; Varghese P
Stroke; 2005 Jul; 36(7):1519-25. PubMed ID: 15920028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
Allen D; Rixson L
Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of stroke rehabilitation practice and outcomes between New Zealand and United States facilities.
McNaughton H; DeJong G; Smout RJ; Melvin JL; Brandstater M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Dec; 86(12 Suppl 2):S115-S120. PubMed ID: 16373146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of the introduction of a case-mix-based funding model of rehabilitation for severe stroke: an Australian experience.
Brock KA; Vale SJ; Cotton SM
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Jul; 88(7):827-32. PubMed ID: 17601460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characterizing speech and language pathology outcomes in stroke rehabilitation.
Hatfield B; Millet D; Coles J; Gassaway J; Conroy B; Smout RJ
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Dec; 86(12 Suppl 2):S61-S72. PubMed ID: 16373141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stroke rehabilitation patients, practice, and outcomes: is earlier and more aggressive therapy better?
Horn SD; DeJong G; Smout RJ; Gassaway J; James R; Conroy B
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Dec; 86(12 Suppl 2):S101-S114. PubMed ID: 16373145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The early impact of the inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system on stroke rehabilitation case mix, practice patterns, and outcomes.
DeJong G; Horn SD; Smout RJ; Ryser DK
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Dec; 86(12 Suppl 2):S93-S100. PubMed ID: 16373144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcomes from stroke rehabilitation in Veterans Affairs rehabilitation units: detecting and correcting for selection bias.
Vogel WB; Rittman M; Bradshaw P; Nissen D; Anderson L; Bates B; Marshall C
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2002; 39(3):367-83. PubMed ID: 12173757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differences in rehabilitation services and outcomes among stroke patients cared for in veterans hospitals.
Hoenig H; Sloane R; Horner RD; Zolkewitz M; Reker D
Health Serv Res; 2001 Feb; 35(6):1293-318. PubMed ID: 11221820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patients with severe stroke benefit most by interdisciplinary rehabilitation team approach.
Yagura H; Miyai I; Suzuki T; Yanagihara T
Cerebrovasc Dis; 2005; 20(4):258-63. PubMed ID: 16123546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Admission ambulation velocity predicts length of stay and discharge disposition following stroke in an acute rehabilitation hospital.
Rabadi MH; Blau A
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2005 Mar; 19(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 15673840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcome indicators for stroke: application of an algorithm treatment across the continuum of postacute rehabilitation services.
Bates BE; Stineman MG
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2000 Nov; 81(11):1468-78. PubMed ID: 11083350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An exploration of central nervous system medication use and outcomes in stroke rehabilitation.
Conroy B; Zorowitz R; Horn SD; Ryser DK; Teraoka J; Smout RJ
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Dec; 86(12 Suppl 2):S73-S81. PubMed ID: 16373142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors that influence the stroke care team's effectiveness in reducing the length of hospital stay.
Schouten LM; Hulscher ME; Akkermans R; van Everdingen JJ; Grol RP; Huijsman R
Stroke; 2008 Sep; 39(9):2515-21. PubMed ID: 18617664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
