274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15759257)
21. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias.
Faeda RS; Tavares HS; Sartori R; Guastaldi AC; Marcantonio E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19615586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The effects of laser etching on shear bond strength at the titanium ceramic interface.
Kim JT; Cho SA
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Feb; 101(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 19167534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The optimum pore size for the fixation of porous-surfaced metal implants by the ingrowth of bone.
Bobyn JD; Pilliar RM; Cameron HU; Weatherly GC
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1980; (150):263-70. PubMed ID: 7428231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Superior sealing effect of hydroxyapatite in porous-coated implants: experimental studies on the migration of polyethylene particles around stable and unstable implants in dogs.
Rahbek O; Kold S; Bendix K; Overgaard S; Søballe K
Acta Orthop; 2005 Jun; 76(3):375-85. PubMed ID: 16156466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Collagen I-coated titanium surfaces: mesenchymal cell adhesion and in vivo evaluation in trabecular bone implants.
Morra M; Cassinelli C; Cascardo G; Mazzucco L; Borzini P; Fini M; Giavaresi G; Giardino R
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2006 Sep; 78(3):449-58. PubMed ID: 16721758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Peri-implant osteogenesis in health and osteoporosis.
Marco F; Milena F; Gianluca G; Vittoria O
Micron; 2005; 36(7-8):630-44. PubMed ID: 16182543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Titanium-coated micromachined grooves of different dimensions affect epithelial and connective-tissue cells differently in vivo.
Chehroudi B; Gould TR; Brunette DM
J Biomed Mater Res; 1990 Sep; 24(9):1203-19. PubMed ID: 2211745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The removal torque of titanium implant inserted in rabbit femur coated with biomimetic deposited Ca-P coating.
Fuming H; Guoli Y; Xiaoxiang W; Shifang Z
J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 35(10):754-65. PubMed ID: 18466279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Peri- and intra-implant bone response to microporous Ti coatings with surface modification.
Braem A; Chaudhari A; Vivan Cardoso M; Schrooten J; Duyck J; Vleugels J
Acta Biomater; 2014 Feb; 10(2):986-95. PubMed ID: 24161385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Pore throat size and connectivity determine bone and tissue ingrowth into porous implants: three-dimensional micro-CT based structural analyses of porous bioactive titanium implants.
Otsuki B; Takemoto M; Fujibayashi S; Neo M; Kokubo T; Nakamura T
Biomaterials; 2006 Dec; 27(35):5892-900. PubMed ID: 16945409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Computer-assisted three-dimensional reconstruction of epithelial cells attached to percutaneous implants.
Chehroudi B; Soorany E; Black N; Weston L; Brunette DM
J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Mar; 29(3):371-9. PubMed ID: 7615588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The effect of porous surface configuration on the tensile strength of fixation of implants by bone ingrowth.
Bobyn JD; Pilliar RM; Cameron HU; Weatherly GC; Kent GM
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1980 Jun; (149):291-8. PubMed ID: 7408314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A study on the effect of dual blasting with TiO2 on titanium implant surfaces on functional attachment in bone.
Rønold HJ; Lyngstadaas SP; Ellingsen JE
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2003 Nov; 67(2):524-30. PubMed ID: 14566794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Bone attachment to glass-fibre-reinforced composite implant with porous surface.
Mattila RH; Laurila P; Rekola J; Gunn J; Lassila LV; Mäntylä T; Aho AJ; Vallittu PK
Acta Biomater; 2009 Jun; 5(5):1639-46. PubMed ID: 19268643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Processing and biocompatibility evaluation of laser processed porous titanium.
Xue W; Krishna BV; Bandyopadhyay A; Bose S
Acta Biomater; 2007 Nov; 3(6):1007-18. PubMed ID: 17627910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Bioactive porous titanium: an alternative to surgical implants.
de Medeiros WS; de Oliveira MV; Pereira LC; de Andrade MC
Artif Organs; 2008 Apr; 32(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 18370941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Hydroxyapatite-electroplated cp-titanium implant and its bone integration potentiality: an in vivo study.
Badr NA; El Hadary AA
Implant Dent; 2007 Sep; 16(3):297-308. PubMed ID: 17846546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of hydroxyapatite coating crystallinity on dissolution and osseointegration in vivo.
Xue W; Liu X; Zheng X; Ding C
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2005 Sep; 74(4):553-61. PubMed ID: 16025491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Osteoclastic resorption of calcium phosphate coatings applied with electrostatic spray deposition (ESD), in vitro.
Siebers MC; Matsuzaka K; Walboomers XF; Leeuwenburgh SC; Wolke JG; Jansen JA
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2005 Sep; 74(4):570-80. PubMed ID: 16025470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Improved osseointegration of PTFEP-coated titanium implants.
Zeifang F; Grunze M; Delling G; Lorenz H; Heisel C; Tosounidis G; Sabo D; Simank HG; Holstein JH
Med Sci Monit; 2008 Feb; 14(2):BR35-40. PubMed ID: 18227757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
