These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15760373)

  • 1. Statistical convenience vs biological insight: consequences of data transformation for the analysis of fitness variation in heterogeneous environments.
    Stanton ML; Thiede DA
    New Phytol; 2005 Apr; 166(1):319-37. PubMed ID: 15760373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evolution in stressful environments II: adaptive value and costs of plasticity in response to low light in Sinapis arvensis.
    Steinger T; Roy BA; Stanton ML
    J Evol Biol; 2003 Mar; 16(2):313-23. PubMed ID: 14635870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consequences of Intraspecific Competition and Environmental Variation for Selection in the Mustard Sinapsis arvensis: Contrasting Ecological and Evolutionary Perspectives.
    Stanton ML; Thiede DA; Roy BA
    Am Nat; 2004 Dec; 164(6):736-752. PubMed ID: 29641926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genotype-environment interaction for total fitness in Drosophila.
    Fry JD
    J Genet; 2008 Dec; 87(4):355-62. PubMed ID: 19147925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of Genetic Variance in Fitness, and Inference of Adaptation, When Fitness Follows a Log-Normal Distribution.
    Bonnet T; Morrissey MB; Kruuk LEB
    J Hered; 2019 Jul; 110(4):383-395. PubMed ID: 31242286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The contribution of spontaneous mutation to variation in environmental responses of Arabidopsis thaliana: responses to light.
    Kavanaugh CM; Shaw RG
    Evolution; 2005 Feb; 59(2):266-75. PubMed ID: 15807413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fitness patterns and phenotypic plasticity in a spatially heterogeneous environment.
    Zhivotovsky LA; Feldman MW; Bergman A
    Genet Res; 1996 Dec; 68(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 9062081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A general condition for adaptive genetic polymorphism in temporally and spatially heterogeneous environments.
    Svardal H; Rueffler C; Hermisson J
    Theor Popul Biol; 2015 Feb; 99():76-97. PubMed ID: 25446960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genotype-by-environment interactions leads to variable selection on life-history strategy in Common Evening Primrose (Oenothera biennis).
    Johnson MT
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Jan; 20(1):190-200. PubMed ID: 17210012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic and nutritional effects on male traits and reproductive performance in Tribolium flour beetles.
    Lewis SM; Tigreros N; Fedina T; Ming QL
    J Evol Biol; 2012 Mar; 25(3):438-51. PubMed ID: 22239387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian inference of selection in a heterogeneous environment from genetic time-series data.
    Gompert Z
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Jan; 25(1):121-34. PubMed ID: 26184577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantification and decomposition of environment-selection relationships.
    Hunter DC; Pemberton JM; Pilkington JG; Morrissey MB
    Evolution; 2018 Apr; 72(4):851-866. PubMed ID: 29518255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Expected relative fitness and the adaptive topography of fluctuating selection.
    Lande R
    Evolution; 2007 Aug; 61(8):1835-46. PubMed ID: 17683427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The ecology and genetics of fitness in Chlamydomonas. X. The relationship between genetic correlation and genetic distance.
    Kassen R; Bell G
    Evolution; 2000 Apr; 54(2):425-32. PubMed ID: 10937219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genotype by environment interaction for yield and somatic cell score with alternative environmental definitions.
    Raffrenato E; Blake RW; Oltenacu PA; Carvalheira J; Licitra G
    J Dairy Sci; 2003 Jul; 86(7):2470-9. PubMed ID: 12906065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genotype by environment interaction for tick resistance of Hereford and Braford beef cattle using reaction norm models.
    Mota RR; Tempelman RJ; Lopes PS; Aguilar I; Silva FF; Cardoso FF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jan; 48():3. PubMed ID: 26767704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evolution of the environmental component of the phenotypic variance: stabilizing selection in changing environments and the cost of homogeneity.
    Zhang XS; Hill WG
    Evolution; 2005 Jun; 59(6):1237-44. PubMed ID: 16050100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sexually antagonistic genetic variation for fitness in red deer.
    Foerster K; Coulson T; Sheldon BC; Pemberton JM; Clutton-Brock TH; Kruuk LE
    Nature; 2007 Jun; 447(7148):1107-10. PubMed ID: 17597758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fitness variation and local distribution limits in an annual plant population.
    Emery NC; Rice KJ; Stanton ML
    Evolution; 2011 Apr; 65(4):1011-20. PubMed ID: 21062275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Natural selection. I. Variable environments and uncertain returns on investment.
    Frank SA
    J Evol Biol; 2011 Nov; 24(11):2299-309. PubMed ID: 21939465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.