These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15760970)

  • 1. Adequacy and reporting of allocation concealment: review of recent trials published in four general medical journals.
    Hewitt C; Hahn S; Torgerson DJ; Watson J; Bland JM
    BMJ; 2005 May; 330(7499):1057-8. PubMed ID: 15760970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The methodologic quality of randomization as assessed from reports of trials in specialist and general medical journals.
    Schulz KF; Chalmers I; Altman DG; Grimes DA; Doré CJ
    Online J Curr Clin Trials; 1995 Aug; Doc No 197():[81 paragraphs]. PubMed ID: 8542098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Allocation concealment: a methodological review.
    Clark L; Schmidt U; Tharmanathan P; Adamson J; Hewitt C; Torgerson D
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2013 Aug; 19(4):708-12. PubMed ID: 23648092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: survey of major general medical journals.
    Berwanger O; Ribeiro RA; Finkelsztejn A; Watanabe M; Suzumura EA; Duncan BB; Devereaux PJ; Cook D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Apr; 62(4):387-92. PubMed ID: 19010643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving the quality of reporting randomized controlled trials in cardiothoracic surgery: the way forward.
    Tiruvoipati R; Balasubramanian SP; Atturu G; Peek GJ; Elbourne D
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Aug; 132(2):233-40. PubMed ID: 16872940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Chinese authors do need CONSORT: reporting quality assessment for five leading Chinese medical journals.
    Xu L; Li J; Zhang M; Ai C; Wang L
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Sep; 29(5):727-31. PubMed ID: 18579449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the quality of randomization from reports of controlled trials published in obstetrics and gynecology journals.
    Schulz KF; Chalmers I; Grimes DA; Altman DG
    JAMA; 1994 Jul; 272(2):125-8. PubMed ID: 8015122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality of reporting of key methodological items of randomized controlled trials in clinical ophthalmic journals.
    Lai TY; Wong VW; Lam RF; Cheng AC; Lam DS; Leung GM
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2007; 14(6):390-8. PubMed ID: 18161613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An analysis of general medical and specialist journals that endorse CONSORT found that reporting was not enforced consistently.
    Mills E; Wu P; Gagnier J; Heels-Ansdell D; Montori VM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Jul; 58(7):662-7. PubMed ID: 15939216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of descriptions of allocation concealment in trial protocols and the published reports: cohort study.
    Pildal J; Chan AW; Hróbjartsson A; Forfang E; Altman DG; Gøtzsche PC
    BMJ; 2005 May; 330(7499):1049. PubMed ID: 15817527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Secular changes in the quality of published randomized clinical trials in rheumatology.
    Hill CL; LaValley MP; Felson DT
    Arthritis Rheum; 2002 Mar; 46(3):779-84. PubMed ID: 11920415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Editorial policy and the reporting of randomized controlled trials: a survey of instructions for authors and assessment of trial reports in Indian medical journals (2004-05).
    Tharyan P; Premkumar TS; Mathew V; Barnabas JP; Manuelraj
    Natl Med J India; 2008; 21(2):62-8. PubMed ID: 18807310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determining the reporting quality of RCTs in clinical pharmacology.
    Mills E; Loke YK; Wu P; Montori VM; Perri D; Moher D; Guyatt G
    Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2004 Jul; 58(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 15206994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence of improving quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in subfertility.
    Dias S; McNamee R; Vail A
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Oct; 21(10):2617-27. PubMed ID: 16793995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Eliminating bias in randomized controlled trials: importance of allocation concealment and masking.
    Viera AJ; Bangdiwala SI
    Fam Med; 2007 Feb; 39(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 17273956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing allocation concealment and blinding in randomized controlled trials: why bother?
    Schulz KF
    ACP J Club; 2000; 132(2):A11-2. PubMed ID: 10750446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bibliographic study showed improving methodology of meta-analyses published in leading journals 1993-2002.
    Gerber S; Tallon D; Trelle S; Schneider M; Jüni P; Egger M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 60(8):773-80. PubMed ID: 17606172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Survival end point reporting in randomized cancer clinical trials: a review of major journals.
    Mathoulin-Pelissier S; Gourgou-Bourgade S; Bonnetain F; Kramar A
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 Aug; 26(22):3721-6. PubMed ID: 18669458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials.
    Pildal J; Hróbjartsson A; Jørgensen KJ; Hilden J; Altman DG; Gøtzsche PC
    Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 36(4):847-57. PubMed ID: 17517809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. For randomized controlled trials, the quality of reports of complementary and alternative medicine was as good as reports of conventional medicine.
    Klassen TP; Pham B; Lawson ML; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Aug; 58(8):763-8. PubMed ID: 16018911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.