BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

476 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15761357)

  • 1. Comparison of current injury scales for survival chance estimation: an evaluation comparing the predictive performance of the ISS, NISS, and AP scores in a Dutch local trauma registration.
    Frankema SP; Steyerberg EW; Edwards MJ; van Vugt AB
    J Trauma; 2005 Mar; 58(3):596-604. PubMed ID: 15761357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Should the New Injury Severity Score replace the Injury Severity Score in the Trauma and Injury Severity Score?
    Aydin SA; Bulut M; Ozgüç H; Ercan I; Türkmen N; Eren B; Esen M
    Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg; 2008 Oct; 14(4):308-12. PubMed ID: 18988055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of a base deficit-based trauma prediction model and comparison with TRISS and ASCOT.
    Lam SW; Lingsma HF; van Beeck EF; Leenen LP
    Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2016 Oct; 42(5):627-633. PubMed ID: 26555726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A simple mathematical modification of TRISS markedly improves calibration.
    Osler TM; Rogers FB; Badger GJ; Healey M; Vane DW; Shackford SR
    J Trauma; 2002 Oct; 53(4):630-4. PubMed ID: 12394858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improved predictions from a severity characterization of trauma (ASCOT) over Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS): results of an independent evaluation.
    Champion HR; Copes WS; Sacco WJ; Frey CF; Holcroft JW; Hoyt DB; Weigelt JA
    J Trauma; 1996 Jan; 40(1):42-8; discussion 48-9. PubMed ID: 8576997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of international trauma scoring systems in urban trauma centres in India.
    Roy N; Gerdin M; Schneider E; Kizhakke Veetil DK; Khajanchi M; Kumar V; Saha ML; Dharap S; Gupta A; Tomson G; von Schreeb J
    Injury; 2016 Nov; 47(11):2459-2464. PubMed ID: 27667119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Harborview assessment for risk of mortality: an improved measure of injury severity on the basis of ICD-9-CM.
    West TA; Rivara FP; Cummings P; Jurkovich GJ; Maier RV
    J Trauma; 2000 Sep; 49(3):530-40; discussion 540-1. PubMed ID: 11003333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A modification of the injury severity score that both improves accuracy and simplifies scoring.
    Osler T; Baker SP; Long W
    J Trauma; 1997 Dec; 43(6):922-5; discussion 925-6. PubMed ID: 9420106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) adjustments for survival prediction.
    Domingues CA; Coimbra R; Poggetti RS; Nogueira LS; de Sousa RMC
    World J Emerg Surg; 2018; 13():12. PubMed ID: 29541155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of trauma and injury severity score in blunt trauma patients by using a Canadian trauma registry.
    Garber BG; Hebert PC; Wells G; Yelle JD
    J Trauma; 1996 May; 40(5):733-7. PubMed ID: 8614071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of Injury Severity Score and New Injury Severity Score after penetrating trauma: A prospective analysis.
    Smith BP; Goldberg AJ; Gaughan JP; Seamon MJ
    J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2015 Aug; 79(2):269-74. PubMed ID: 26218696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of mortality in pediatric trauma patients: new injury severity score outperforms injury severity score in the severely injured.
    Sullivan T; Haider A; DiRusso SM; Nealon P; Shaukat A; Slim M
    J Trauma; 2003 Dec; 55(6):1083-7; discussion 1087-8. PubMed ID: 14676655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of trauma scoring systems for predicting mortality in firearm injuries.
    Köksal O; Ozdemir F; Bulut M; Aydin S; Almacioğlu ML; Ozgüç H
    Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg; 2009 Nov; 15(6):559-64. PubMed ID: 20037873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the Injury Severity Score and ICD-9 diagnosis codes as predictors of outcome in injury: analysis of 44,032 patients.
    Rutledge R; Hoyt DB; Eastman AB; Sise MJ; Velky T; Canty T; Wachtel T; Osler TM
    J Trauma; 1997 Mar; 42(3):477-87; discussion 487-9. PubMed ID: 9095116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Childhood falls: characteristics, outcome, and comparison of the Injury Severity Score and New Injury Severity Score.
    Bulut M; Koksal O; Korkmaz A; Turan M; Ozguc H
    Emerg Med J; 2006 Jul; 23(7):540-5. PubMed ID: 16794098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Consensus or data-derived anatomic injury severity scoring?
    Moore L; Lavoie A; Le Sage N; Bergeron E; Emond M; Abdous B
    J Trauma; 2008 Feb; 64(2):420-6. PubMed ID: 18301208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the New Injury Severity Score and the Injury Severity Score.
    Tay SY; Sloan EP; Zun L; Zaret P
    J Trauma; 2004 Jan; 56(1):162-4. PubMed ID: 14749583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trauma survival prediction in Asian population: a modification of TRISS to improve accuracy.
    Chan CK; Yau KK; Cheung MT
    Emerg Med J; 2014 Feb; 31(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 23314210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the new injury severity score and the injury severity score in multiple trauma patients.
    Zhao XG; Ma YF; Zhang M; Gan JX; Xu SW; Jiang GY
    Chin J Traumatol; 2008 Dec; 11(6):368-71. PubMed ID: 19032853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing traditional and novel injury scoring systems in a US level-I trauma center: an opportunity for improved injury surveillance in low- and middle-income countries.
    Laytin AD; Dicker RA; Gerdin M; Roy N; Sarang B; Kumar V; Juillard C
    J Surg Res; 2017 Jul; 215():60-66. PubMed ID: 28688663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.