BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15762260)

  • 1. Femoral cement pressurization in hip arthroplasty: a laboratory comparison of three techniques.
    Kapoor B; Datir SP; Davis B; Wynn-Jones CH; Maffulli N
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2004 Dec; 75(6):708-12. PubMed ID: 15762260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of cement introduction and pressurization techniques.
    Dunne NJ; Orr JF; Beverland DE
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2004; 218(1):11-25. PubMed ID: 14982342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Femoral cement pressurization in hip arthroplasty: a comparison of 3 systems.
    Munro NA; Nicol M; Selvaraj S; Hussain SM; Finlayson DF
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Sep; 22(6):893-901. PubMed ID: 17826282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Femoral cement pressurisation for hip arthroplasty in previously fixated hips: an experimental study.
    McMahon SE; Alvi F; Lemon JG; Lovell ME
    Injury; 2010 Apr; 41(4):352-5. PubMed ID: 19828147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of fixation of the femoral component without cement and fixation with use of a bone-vacuum cementing technique for the prevention of fat embolism during total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized clinical trial.
    Pitto RP; Koessler M; Kuehle JW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Jun; 81(6):831-43. PubMed ID: 10391548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new bleeding model of the human acetabulum and a pilot comparison of 2 different cement pressurizers.
    Parsch D; Diehm C; New AM; Schneider S; Breusch SJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2004 Apr; 19(3):381-6. PubMed ID: 15067656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does increased cement pressure produce superior femoral component fixation?
    Dozier JK; Harrigan T; Kurtz WH; Hawkins C; Hill R
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jun; 15(4):488-95. PubMed ID: 10884210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of 2 modern femoral cementing techniques: analysis by cement-bone interface pressure measurements, computerized image analysis, and static mechanical testing.
    Reading AD; McCaskie AW; Barnes MR; Gregg PJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jun; 15(4):479-87. PubMed ID: 10884209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cement venogram--a risk of satisfactory cement pressurization.
    McClelland D; Bracy D
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Jan; 21(1):141-3. PubMed ID: 16446200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of two pressurisers for cementation of the proximal femur.
    Morishima T; Choy GG; Crawford RW; Wilson LJ
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2014 Aug; 22(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 25163947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro and in vivo studies of pressurization of femoral cement in total hip arthroplasty.
    Davies JP; Harris WH
    J Arthroplasty; 1993 Dec; 8(6):585-91. PubMed ID: 8301275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A novel technique for femoral canal occlusion during cement pressurization in proximal femoral arthroplasty.
    Holt G; Panousis K; Mohammed A; Patil S; Meek RM
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Jan; 27(1):129-33. PubMed ID: 22152980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An in vitro study of a new design of acetabular cement pressurizer.
    Bernoski FP; New AM; Scott RA; Northmore-Ball MD
    J Arthroplasty; 1998 Feb; 13(2):200-6. PubMed ID: 9526215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is TKA femoral implant stability improved by pressure applied cement? a comparison of 2 cementing techniques.
    Schonhoff M; Beckmann NA; Schwarze M; Eissler M; Kretzer JP; Renkawitz T; Jaeger S
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Jan; 24(1):51. PubMed ID: 36670400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Primary aseptic revision of the femoral component of a cemented total hip arthroplasty using a cemented technique without bone graft.
    Bardou-Jacquet J; Souillac V; Mouton A; Chauveaux D
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Jun; 95(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 19523892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The femoral cement compactor. An improvement in cementing technique in total hip replacement.
    Oh I; Bourne RB; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1983 Dec; 65(9):1335-8. PubMed ID: 6654945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cement applicator use for hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Jaeger S; Rieger JS; Obermeyer B; Klotz MC; Kretzer JP; Bitsch RG
    Med Eng Phys; 2015 May; 37(5):447-52. PubMed ID: 25772262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. No benefit of a proximal stem centralizer in cementing of a femoral prosthesis in human cadavers.
    Petruskevicius J; Lind-Hansen T; Aleksyniene R; Nyengaard JR; Nielsen PT; Søballe K
    Acta Orthop; 2011 Jun; 82(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 21434768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cementing technique affects the rate of femoral component loosening after high flexion total knee arthroplasty.
    Han HS; Lee MC
    Knee; 2017 Dec; 24(6):1435-1441. PubMed ID: 28974403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Femoral Cementation in Knee Arthroplasty-A Comparison of Three Cementing Techniques in a Sawbone Model Using the ATTUNE Knee.
    Schwarze M; Schonhoff M; Beckmann NA; Eckert JA; Bitsch RG; Jäger S
    J Knee Surg; 2021 Feb; 34(3):258-266. PubMed ID: 31434146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.