These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15762260)

  • 61. Cement pressurization after provisional repair of femoral cortical defects.
    Markel DC; Critchfield J; Chaffin A; Wooley PH; Grimm MJ
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2003 May; 32(5):229-33. PubMed ID: 12772873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Cement restrictor function below the femoral isthmus.
    Moran M; Heisel C; Rupp R; Simpson AH; Breusch SJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 May; 458():111-6. PubMed ID: 17206103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Revision of hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty using the cement-in-cement technique.
    Mounsey EJ; Williams DH; Howell JR; Hubble MJ
    Bone Joint J; 2015 Dec; 97-B(12):1623-7. PubMed ID: 26637675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. [Effect of femoral cementing technique on results. Comparison between retrograde technique and vacuum application].
    Ungethuem S; Lehner B; Reitzel T; Buckley PJ; Mau H; Breusch SJ
    Orthopade; 2005 Jul; 34(7):690-7. PubMed ID: 15959756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Femoral cementing technique for hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Bitsch RG; Heisel C; Silva M; Schmalzried TP
    J Orthop Res; 2007 Apr; 25(4):423-31. PubMed ID: 17262829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. The bone-vacuum cementing technique for the fixation of the stem in total hip arthroplasty.
    Pitto RP; Kessler M; Schikora N; di Muria GV
    Chir Organi Mov; 2001; 86(2):99-110. PubMed ID: 12025052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Influence of bone density on the cement fixation of femoral hip resurfacing components.
    Bitsch RG; Jäger S; Lürssen M; Loidolt T; Schmalzried TP; Clarius M
    J Orthop Res; 2010 Aug; 28(8):986-91. PubMed ID: 20162694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. The technique of cemented total hip replacement.
    Dalury DF
    Orthopedics; 2005 Aug; 28(8 Suppl):s853-6. PubMed ID: 16119727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Mid- and long-term results of femoral component revision using the cement-in-cement technique: Average 10.8-year follow-up study.
    Okuzu Y; Goto K; So K; Kuroda Y; Matsuda S
    J Orthop Sci; 2016 Nov; 21(6):810-814. PubMed ID: 27553266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Revision of the cemented femoral stem using a cement-in-cement technique: a five- to 15-year review.
    Duncan WW; Hubble MJ; Howell JR; Whitehouse SL; Timperley AJ; Gie GA
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 May; 91(5):577-82. PubMed ID: 19407288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Cementing techniques for hip resurfacing arthroplasty: in vitro study of pressure and temperature.
    Bitsch RG; Loidolt T; Heisel C; Schmalzried TP
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Jan; 26(1):144-51. PubMed ID: 20097035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. [Cemented total hip arthroplasty in Germany - update 2010].
    Fischer CA; Kaszap B; Drexler C; Lehner B; Clarius M
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2012 Jun; 150(3):309-17. PubMed ID: 22354443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Cement mantle retention: filling the hole.
    Cross M; Bostrom M
    Orthopedics; 2009 Sep; 32(9):. PubMed ID: 19751012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Changes in femoral cortical porosity after reaming and intramedullary canal preparation in a canine model.
    Syed KA; Kuzyk PR; Yoo DJ; Zdero R; Richards RR; Schemitsch EH
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Feb; 28(2):368-73. PubMed ID: 22552219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. An in vitro study of femoral intramedullary pressures during hip replacement using modern cement technique.
    Song Y; Goodman SB; Jaffe RA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 May; (302):297-304. PubMed ID: 8168317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. An investigation of the performance of Biostop G and Hardinge bone plugs.
    Prendergast PJ; Birthistle P; Waide DV; Kumar NV
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 1999; 213(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 10466367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Robotic bone preparation does not increase cement penetration into the proximal femur: a matched-pair cadaver study comparing hand-broaching versus robotic bone preparation.
    Aldinger PR; Schneider M; Pritsch M; Kreutzer J; Becker CR; Breusch SJ
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2003 Jun; 74(3):270-6. PubMed ID: 12899546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. [Application of an amphiphilic bonder in a goat model to increase the femoral cement-bone adhesion in cemented hip arthroplasty].
    Müller-Rath R; Wirtz D; Andereya S; Gravius S; Hermanns-Sachweh B; Marx R; Mumme T
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2007; 145(4):476-82. PubMed ID: 17912668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Femoral cement pressurization during total hip arthroplasty. The role of different femoral stems with reference to stem size and shape.
    Bourne RB; Oh I; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1984 Mar; (183):12-6. PubMed ID: 6697578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Current cementing techniques in hip hemi-arthroplasty.
    Scott S; McCaskie AW; Calder SJ; Wildin C; Gregg PJ
    Injury; 2001 Jul; 32(6):461-4. PubMed ID: 11476810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.