BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15762339)

  • 1. Direct restorative materials use in Australia in 2002.
    Burke FJ; McHugh S; Randall RC; Meyers IA; Pitt J; Hall AC
    Aust Dent J; 2004 Dec; 49(4):185-91. PubMed ID: 15762339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Amalgam and composite use in UK general dental practice in 2001.
    Burke FJ; McHugh S; Hall AC; Randall RC; Widstrom E; Forss H
    Br Dent J; 2003 Jun; 194(11):613-8; discussion 609. PubMed ID: 12819697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attitudes of general dental practitioners in the UK to the use of composite materials in posterior teeth.
    Gilmour AS; Evans P; Addy LD
    Br Dent J; 2007 May; 202(12):E32. PubMed ID: 17510663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinicians' choices of restorative materials for children.
    Tran LA; Messer LB
    Aust Dent J; 2003 Dec; 48(4):221-32. PubMed ID: 14738124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Restorative service patterns in Australia: amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer restorations.
    Brennan DS; Spencer AJ
    Int Dent J; 2003 Dec; 53(6):455-63. PubMed ID: 14725373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dentists' restorative decision-making and implications for an 'amalgamless' profession. Part 4: clinical factor.
    Alexander G; Hopcraft MS; Tyas MJ; Wong R
    Aust Dent J; 2017 Sep; 62(3):363-371. PubMed ID: 28437002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contemporary dental practice in the UK in 2008: aspects of direct restorations, endodontics and bleaching.
    Brunton PA; Burke FJ; Sharif MO; Creanor S; Hosey MT; Mannocci F; Wilson NH
    Br Dent J; 2012 Jan; 212(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 22281627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attitudes and use of rubber dam by Irish general dental practitioners.
    Lynch CD; McConnell RJ
    Int Endod J; 2007 Jun; 40(6):427-32. PubMed ID: 17501755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. From amalgam to composite: selection of restorative materials and restoration longevity in Finland.
    Forss H; Widström E
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2001 Apr; 59(2):57-62. PubMed ID: 11370750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of lining materials under posterior resin composite restorations in the UK.
    Blum IR; Younis N; Wilson NH
    J Dent; 2017 Feb; 57():66-72. PubMed ID: 27988345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dentists' restorative decision-making and implications for an 'amalgamless' profession. Part 5: knowledge factors.
    Alexander G; Hopcraft MS; Tyas MJ; Wong R
    Aust Dent J; 2017 Dec; 62(4):440-452. PubMed ID: 28542834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Post-Amalgam Era: Norwegian Dentists' Experiences with Composite Resins and Repair of Defective Amalgam Restorations.
    Kopperud SE; Staxrud F; Espelid I; Tveit AB
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2016 Apr; 13(4):441. PubMed ID: 27110804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Observations in Australia of the use of glass ionomer cement restorative material.
    Forsten L; Mount GJ; Knight G
    Aust Dent J; 1994 Dec; 39(6):339-43. PubMed ID: 7832679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selection of restorative materials in permanent teeth in general dental practice.
    Mjör IA; Moorhead JE; Dahl JE
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1999 Oct; 57(5):257-62. PubMed ID: 10614902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Problems associated with restorative materials--dentists' views in Finland and Sweden.
    Widström E; Sundberg H
    Swed Dent J; 1991; 15(4):153-60. PubMed ID: 1957249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Restorative treatment decisions on approximal caries in Norway.
    Tveit AB; Espelid I; Skodje F
    Int Dent J; 1999 Jun; 49(3):165-72. PubMed ID: 10858750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors relating to usage patterns of amalgam and resin composite for posterior restorations--a prospective analysis.
    Khalaf ME; Alomari QD; Omar R
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):785-92. PubMed ID: 24769386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Materials used to restore class II lesions in primary molars: a survey of California pediatric dentists.
    Pair RL; Udin RD; Tanbonliong T
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(6):501-7. PubMed ID: 15646912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. UK dentists' attitudes and behaviour towards Atraumatic Restorative Treatment for primary teeth.
    Burke FJ; McHugh S; Shaw L; Hosey MT; Macpherson L; Delargy S; Dopheide B
    Br Dent J; 2005 Sep; 199(6):365-9; discussion 353; quiz 372. PubMed ID: 16184117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attitudes of final year dental students to the use of rubber dam.
    Mala S; Lynch CD; Burke FM; Dummer PM
    Int Endod J; 2009 Jul; 42(7):632-8. PubMed ID: 19467044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.