These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1576336)
1. Quality control of laboratory results in real time. Picco W; Pinna Pintor L; Baruzzo G; Pistono O; Triumbari F; Pinna Pintor P Qual Assur Health Care; 1992 Mar; 4(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 1576336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reducing preanalytical laboratory sample errors through educational and technological interventions. Lillo R; Salinas M; Lopez-Garrigos M; Naranjo-Santana Y; Gutiérrez M; Marín MD; Miralles M; Uris J Clin Lab; 2012; 58(9-10):911-7. PubMed ID: 23163106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Errors in pathology and laboratory medicine: consequences and prevention. Hollensead SC; Lockwood WB; Elin RJ J Surg Oncol; 2004 Dec; 88(3):161-81. PubMed ID: 15562462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development and operation of a quality assurance system for deviations from standard operating procedures in a clinical cell therapy laboratory. McKenna D; Kadidlo D; Sumstad D; McCullough J Cytotherapy; 2003; 5(4):314-22. PubMed ID: 12944238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preanalytical variability: the dark side of the moon in laboratory testing. Lippi G; Guidi GC; Mattiuzzi C; Plebani M Clin Chem Lab Med; 2006; 44(4):358-65. PubMed ID: 16599826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality indicators and specifications for the extra-analytical phases in clinical laboratory management. Ricós C; García-Victoria M; de la Fuente B Clin Chem Lab Med; 2004; 42(6):578-82. PubMed ID: 15259371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measuring Analytical Quality: Total Analytical Error Versus Measurement Uncertainty. Westgard JO; Westgard SA Clin Lab Med; 2017 Mar; 37(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 28153359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Application of traceability concepts to analytical quality control may reconcile total error with uncertainty of measurement. Panteghini M Clin Chem Lab Med; 2010; 48(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 19995178 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Development and implementation of an automatic system for verification, validation and delivery of laboratory test results. Guidi GC; Poli G; Bassi A; Giobelli L; Benetollo PP; Lippi G Clin Chem Lab Med; 2009; 47(11):1355-60. PubMed ID: 19817645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The advantages of dynamic evaluation of measurement quality in clinical diagnostic laboratory]. Bondarev AM; Verovskiy VT; Ostrovskiy OV; Murzina NP; Nokhashkieva IA; Trifonova IA; Fomina TA Klin Lab Diagn; 2014 Jan; (1):62-5. PubMed ID: 25069225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The NEXUS vision: an alternative to the reference value concept. Goldschmidt HM Clin Chem Lab Med; 2004; 42(7):868-73. PubMed ID: 15327025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using patient outcomes to screen for clinical laboratory errors. Winkelman JW; Mennemeyer ST Clin Lab Manage Rev; 1996; 10(2):134-6, 139-42. PubMed ID: 10172598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Managing quality vs. measuring uncertainty in the medical laboratory. Westgard JO Clin Chem Lab Med; 2010; 48(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 19919330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sigma Metrics Across the Total Testing Process. Charuruks N Clin Lab Med; 2017 Mar; 37(1):97-117. PubMed ID: 28153373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]