167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1576376)
1. Accuracy and expert testimony.
Hoge SK; Grisso T
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1992; 20(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 1576376
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Homicide markers from the viewpoint of the psychiatric expert].
Janzarik W
Nervenarzt; 1992 Nov; 63(11):656-67. PubMed ID: 1470268
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Personality assessment in equivocal deaths.
Young TJ
J Pers Assess; 1992 Apr; 58(2):430-1. PubMed ID: 1578335
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Jealousy and jealous delusions as motive in homicide crimes--forensic and psychiatric aspects].
Soyka M; Soyka M
Psychiatr Prax; 1996 May; 23(3):131-4. PubMed ID: 8711003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Response to Simon: Legal relevance demands that evil be defined and standardized.
Welner M
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(4):417-21. PubMed ID: 14974795
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Commentary: personality disorders and criminal law.
Slovenko R
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(2):182-5. PubMed ID: 19535554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Mickey Finn defense: involuntary intoxication and insanity.
Goldstein RL
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1992; 20(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 1576373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Forensic aspects in daily practice, law and psychiatry. 1].
Hoffmann-Richter U; Dittmann V
Psychiatr Prax; 1996 Jan; 23(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 8851237
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. False confessions, expert testimony, and admissibility.
Watson C; Weiss KJ; Pouncey C
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2010; 38(2):174-86. PubMed ID: 20542936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of psychiatry in death penalty defense.
Beck JC
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(4):453-63. PubMed ID: 8054675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Brushed-off testimony.
Brodsky SL; Wygant DB
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(4):562-5. PubMed ID: 23233479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Keeping criticism at bay: suggestions for forensic psychiatry experts.
Friend A
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(4):406-12. PubMed ID: 14974793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Expert testimony and the effects of a biological approach, psychopathy, and juror attitudes in cases of insanity.
Rendell JA; Huss MT; Jensen ML
Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(3):411-25. PubMed ID: 20014145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Revisiting the deific-decree doctrine in Washington state.
Leong GB
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 18354130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Iatrogenesis and malingering of multiple personality disorder in the forensic evaluation of homicide defendants.
Coons PM
Psychiatr Clin North Am; 1991 Sep; 14(3):757-68. PubMed ID: 1946034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Present misuses of article 64 of the Criminal Code on insanity when performing the deed].
Bénézech M
Ann Med Psychol (Paris); 1989 Sep; 147(7):738-41. PubMed ID: 2619143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Challenging a flexible neuropsychological battery under Kelly/Frye: a case study.
McKinzey RK; Ziegler TG
Behav Sci Law; 1999; 17(4):543-51. PubMed ID: 10653999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Commentary: personality disorder and diminished responsibility--the significance of priorities and objectives.
Baird JA; Rodgers C
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(2):186-7. PubMed ID: 19535555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The insanity defence.
Pridmore S
Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 1992 Dec; 26(4):678, 680. PubMed ID: 1476536
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Battered women who kill: the impact of expert testimony and empathy induction in the courtroom.
Plumm KM; Terrance CA
Violence Against Women; 2009 Feb; 15(2):186-205. PubMed ID: 19126834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
