392 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15764175)
1. Timeliness of case reporting in the Swedish statutory surveillance of communicable diseases 1998--2002.
Jansson A; Arneborn M; Skärlund K; Ekdahl K
Scand J Infect Dis; 2004; 36(11-12):865-72. PubMed ID: 15764175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. SmiNet-2: Description of an internet-based surveillance system for communicable diseases in Sweden.
Rolfhamre P; Jansson A; Arneborn M; Ekdahl K
Euro Surveill; 2006; 11(5):103-7. PubMed ID: 16757847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Potential effects of electronic laboratory reporting on improving timeliness of infectious disease notification--Florida, 2002-2006.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2008 Dec; 57(49):1325-8. PubMed ID: 19078921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implementing a public web based GIS service for feedback of surveillance data on communicable diseases in Sweden.
Rolfhamre P; Grabowska K; Ekdahl K
BMC Infect Dis; 2004 Jun; 4():17. PubMed ID: 15191619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Study on the timeliness of the notifiable communicable diseases surveillance system in Fujian province, China, 2004].
Hong RT; Ou JM; Zhang CM; Huang WL; Xie ZH; Jiang AM; Xu LS
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Sep; 26(9):694-7. PubMed ID: 16471221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Electronic reporting improves timeliness and completeness of infectious disease notification, The Netherlands, 2003.
Ward M; Brandsema P; van Straten E; Bosman A
Euro Surveill; 2005 Jan; 10(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 15701937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sensitivity of the Swedish statutory surveillance system for communicable diseases 1998-2002, assessed by the capture-recapture method.
Jansson A; Arneborn M; Ekdahl K
Epidemiol Infect; 2005 Jun; 133(3):401-7. PubMed ID: 15962546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [More and faster notification of infectious disease if notification is carried out by the laboratories instead of the diagnosing physician].
Rietveld A; Schneeberger PM; Wijkmans CJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Feb; 149(6):304-7. PubMed ID: 15730039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of reporting timeliness of public health surveillance systems for infectious diseases.
Jajosky RA; Groseclose SL
BMC Public Health; 2004 Jul; 4():29. PubMed ID: 15274746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electronic laboratory reporting for the infectious diseases physician and clinical microbiologist.
Wurtz R; Cameron BJ
Clin Infect Dis; 2005 Jun; 40(11):1638-43. PubMed ID: 15889362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Case definitions for diseases under national surveillance.
Can Commun Dis Rep; 2000 May; 26 Suppl 3():i-iv 1-122. PubMed ID: 11055080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Timeliness of notification in infectious disease cases.
Domínguez A; Coll JJ; Fuentes M; Salleras L
Public Health Rep; 1992; 107(4):474-6. PubMed ID: 1641446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Australia's notifiable diseases status, 1997. Annual report of the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System.
O'Brien E; D'Souza R; Gilroy N; Burgess M; Lister S; McIntyre P; Torvaldsen S; Moser K; Milton A
Commun Dis Intell; 1999 Jan; 23(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 10095294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Could laboratory-based notification improve the control of foodborne illness in New Zealand?
Simmons G; Whittaker R; Boyle K; Morris AJ; Upton A; Calder L
N Z Med J; 2002 May; 115(1154):237-40. PubMed ID: 12117175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Active case-finding of communicable diseases in the south of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Karimi A; Kadivar MR; Fararoee M; Alborzi A
East Mediterr Health J; 2000; 6(2-3):487-93. PubMed ID: 11556041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of reporting and recording system of communicable diseases in Jeddah Region.
Bakarman MA; Al-Raddadi RM
Saudi Med J; 2000 Aug; 21(8):751-4. PubMed ID: 11423888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Australia's notifiable diseases status, 1996. Annual report of the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System.
Curran M; Harvey B; Crerar S; Oliver G; D'Souza R; Myint H; Rann C; Andrews R
Commun Dis Intell; 1997 Oct; 21(20):281-307. PubMed ID: 9339602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of electronic laboratory reporting on the burden of lyme disease surveillance--New Jersey, 2001-2006.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2008 Jan; 57(2):42-5. PubMed ID: 18199968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A critical review of the infectious diseases surveillance system in the Gaza Strip.
Awad R; Al Rahman Omer A; Abu Shahla N
East Mediterr Health J; 2001; 7(1-2):274-9. PubMed ID: 12596978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. New arrangements for processing notifications of infectious disease returns.
Commun Dis Rep CDR Wkly; 1997 Apr; 7(17):1. PubMed ID: 9534820
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
