147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15764765)
1. Methacholine challenge: comparison of two methods.
Cockcroft DW; Davis BE; Todd DC; Smycniuk AJ
Chest; 2005 Mar; 127(3):839-44. PubMed ID: 15764765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Difference between dosimeter and tidal breathing methacholine challenge: contributions of dose and deep inspiration bronchoprotection.
Allen ND; Davis BE; Hurst TS; Cockcroft DW
Chest; 2005 Dec; 128(6):4018-23. PubMed ID: 16354875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dosimeter methacholine challenge: comparison of maximal versus submaximal inhalations.
Todd DC; Davis BE; Hurst TS; Cockcroft DW
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2004 Sep; 114(3):517-9. PubMed ID: 15356550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of challenge method on sensitivity, reactivity, and maximal response to methacholine.
Prieto L; Ferrer A; Domenech J; Pérez-Francés C
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2006 Aug; 97(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 16937747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Methacholine challenge testing: comparison of the two American Thoracic Society-recommended methods.
Wubbel C; Asmus MJ; Stevens G; Chesrown SE; Hendeles L
Chest; 2004 Feb; 125(2):453-8. PubMed ID: 14769724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of 2 methods of continuous aerosol administration during methacholine challenge testing.
Hurst TS; Cockcroft DW; Hannah VD; Davis BE
Respir Care; 2006 Jan; 51(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 16381617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of two standardized methods of methacholine inhalation challenge in young adults.
Siersted HC; Walker CM; O'Shaughnessy AD; Willan AR; Wiecek EM; Sears MR
Eur Respir J; 2000 Jan; 15(1):181-4. PubMed ID: 10678643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two ATS recommended protocols for administration of methacholine are not equal.
Burke RR; Obeid IM; Williams LK; Morris ZQ
J Asthma; 2009 Sep; 46(7):740-4. PubMed ID: 19728216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differences in the response to methacholine between the tidal breathing and dosimeter methods: influence of the dose of bronchoconstrictor agent delivered to the mouth.
Prieto L; Lopez V; Llusar R; Rojas R; Marin J
Chest; 2008 Oct; 134(4):699-703. PubMed ID: 18625670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Methacholine challenge--comparison of an ATS protocol to a new rapid single concentration technique.
Schulze J; Rosewich M; Riemer C; Dressler M; Rose MA; Zielen S
Respir Med; 2009 Dec; 103(12):1898-903. PubMed ID: 19596563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Methacholine bronchial challenge using a dosimeter with controlled tidal breathing.
Nieminen MM; Lahdensuo A; Kellomaeki L; Karvonen J; Muittari A
Thorax; 1988 Nov; 43(11):896-900. PubMed ID: 3065974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Methacholine Challenge Testing: A Novel Method for Measuring PD
Davis BE; Simonson SK; Blais CM; Cockcroft DW
Chest; 2017 Dec; 152(6):1251-1257. PubMed ID: 28923758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 between the AeroEclipse II breath-actuated nebulizer and the wright nebulizer in adult subjects with asthma.
El-Gammal AI; Killian KJ; Scime TX; Beaudin S; Schlatman A; Cockcroft DW; Gauvreau GM
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2015 Jul; 12(7):1039-43. PubMed ID: 25871542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Methacholine challenge test: Comparison of tidal breathing and dosimeter methods in children.
Mazi A; Lands LC; Zielinski D
Pediatr Pulmonol; 2018 Feb; 53(2):174-180. PubMed ID: 29178471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The bronchoprotective effect of inhaling methacholine by using total lung capacity inspirations has a marked influence on the interpretation of the test result.
Cockcroft DW; Davis BE
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2006 Jun; 117(6):1244-8. PubMed ID: 16750982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Deep inspiration avoidance and methacholine response in normal subjects and patients with asthma.
Simard B; Turcotte H; Cockcroft DW; Davis BE; Boulay ME; Boulet LP
Chest; 2005 Jan; 127(1):135-42. PubMed ID: 15653974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of challenge method on sensitivity and reactivity to adenosine 5'-monophosphate in subjects with suspected asthma.
Prieto L; Reig I; Rojas R; Ferrer A; Domenech J
Chest; 2006 Nov; 130(5):1448-53. PubMed ID: 17099023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of a 1-concentration-4-step dosimeter protocol for methacholine testing.
Merget R; Jörres RA; Heinze E; Haufs MG; Taeger D; Brüning T
Respir Med; 2009 Apr; 103(4):607-13. PubMed ID: 19010655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Developing alternative delivery systems for methacholine challenge tests.
Coates AL; Leung K; Dell SD
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv; 2014 Feb; 27(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 23586502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Methacholine challenge: test-shortening procedures.
Cockcroft DW; Marciniuk DD; Hurst TS; Cotton DJ; Laframboise KF; McNab BD; Skomro RP
Chest; 2001 Dec; 120(6):1857-60. PubMed ID: 11742913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
