These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15765342)

  • 1. Dental fracture risk of metal vs plastic laryngoscope blades in dental models.
    Itoman EM; Kajioka EH; Yamamoto LG
    Am J Emerg Med; 2005 Mar; 23(2):186-9. PubMed ID: 15765342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of plastic single-use and metal reusable laryngoscope blades for orotracheal intubation during rapid sequence induction of anesthesia.
    Amour J; Marmion F; Birenbaum A; Nicolas-Robin A; Coriat P; Riou B; Langeron O
    Anesthesiology; 2006 Jan; 104(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 16394691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of the forces exerted during laryngoscopy using disposable and non-disposable laryngoscope blades.
    Evans A; Vaughan RS; Hall JE; Mecklenburgh J; Wilkes AR
    Anaesthesia; 2003 Sep; 58(9):869-73. PubMed ID: 12911359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Metal and Plastic Disposable Laryngoscope Blade with Reusable Macintosh Blade in Difficult and Inhalation Injury Airway Scenario: A Manikin Study.
    Moritz A; Heinrich S; Irouschek A; Birkholz T; Prottengeier J; Schmidt J
    J Emerg Med; 2017 Jan; 52(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 27693076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lower flange modification improves performance of the Macintosh, but not the Miller laryngoscope blade.
    Kimberger O; Fischer L; Plank C; Mayer N
    Can J Anaesth; 2006 Jun; 53(6):595-601. PubMed ID: 16738295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Disposable stainless steel vs plastic laryngoscope blades among paramedics.
    Dos Santos FD; Schnakofsky R; Cascio A; Liu J; Merlin MA
    Am J Emerg Med; 2011 Jul; 29(6):590-3. PubMed ID: 20825833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of 20 laryngoscope blades using an intubating manikin: visual analogue scores and forces exerted during laryngoscopy.
    Rassam S; Wilkes AR; Hall JE; Mecklenburgh JS
    Anaesthesia; 2005 Apr; 60(4):384-94. PubMed ID: 15766342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of plastic single-use with metallic reusable laryngoscope blades for out-of-hospital tracheal intubation.
    Jabre P; Leroux B; Brohon S; Penet C; Lockey D; Adnet F; Margenet A; Marty J; Combes X
    Ann Emerg Med; 2007 Sep; 50(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 17583382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Callander laryngoscope blade modification is associated with a decreased risk of dental contact.
    Lee J; Choi JH; Lee YK; Kim ES; Kwon OK; Hastings RH
    Can J Anaesth; 2004 Feb; 51(2):181-4. PubMed ID: 14766698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laryngoscope plastic blades in scheduled general anesthesia patients: a comparative randomized study.
    Galinski M; Catineau J; Rayeh F; Muret J; Ciebiera JP; Plantevin F; Foucrier A; Tual L; Combes X; Adnet F
    J Clin Anesth; 2011 Mar; 23(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 21377073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of plastic and metallic single-use and metallic reusable laryngoscope blades: a randomised controlled trial.
    Buléon C; Parienti JJ; Lesage A; Grandin W; Pouliquen E; Flais F; Simonet T; Gérard JL; Hanouz JL
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2013 Apr; 30(4):163-9. PubMed ID: 23274619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Callender modification of the Macintosh laryngoscope blade reduces the risk of tooth-blade contact in children.
    Mireskandari SM; Askarizadeh N; Darabi ME; Rahimi E; Ataee HA; Chamrami F; Eghtesadi-Araghi P
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2008 Nov; 18(11):1035-9. PubMed ID: 18950325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Out-of-hospital tracheal intubation with single-use versus reusable metal laryngoscope blades: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
    Jabre P; Galinski M; Ricard-Hibon A; Devaud ML; Ruscev M; Kulstad E; Vicaut E; Adnet F; Margenet A; Marty J; Combes X
    Ann Emerg Med; 2011 Mar; 57(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 21129822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Design evaluation of commonly used rigid and levering laryngoscope blades.
    Yardeni IZ; Gefen A; Smolyarenko V; Zeidel A; Beilin B
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2002 Sep; 46(8):1003-9. PubMed ID: 12190803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. User satisfaction and forces generated during laryngoscopy using disposable Miller blades: a manikin study.
    Sudhir G; Wilkes AR; Clyburn P; Aguilera I; Hall JE
    Anaesthesia; 2007 Oct; 62(10):1056-60. PubMed ID: 17845659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Cardiff paediatric laryngoscope blade: a comparison with the Miller size 1 and Macintosh size 2 laryngoscope blades.
    Jones RM; Jones PL; Gildersleve CD; Hall JE; Harding LJ; Chawathe MS
    Anaesthesia; 2004 Oct; 59(10):1016-9. PubMed ID: 15488063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Forces applied to the maxillary incisors by video laryngoscopes and the Macintosh laryngoscope.
    Lee RA; van Zundert AA; Maassen RL; Wieringa PA
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2012 Feb; 56(2):224-9. PubMed ID: 22091734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In reply: Mechanical testing of the deflection and ultimate strength of metal and plastic disposable laryngoscope blades.
    Choi J; Song Y; Cho Y; Lim TH
    Can J Anaesth; 2022 Mar; 69(3):396-397. PubMed ID: 34918198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of single-use and reusable metal laryngoscope blades for orotracheal intubation during rapid sequence induction of anesthesia: a multicenter cluster randomized study.
    Amour J; Le Manach YL; Borel M; Lenfant F; Nicolas-Robin A; Carillion A; Ripart J; Riou B; Langeron O
    Anesthesiology; 2010 Feb; 112(2):325-32. PubMed ID: 20098134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pediatric laryngoscope blade size selection using facial landmarks.
    Mellick LB; Edholm T; Corbett SW
    Pediatr Emerg Care; 2006 Apr; 22(4):226-9. PubMed ID: 16651910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.