These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15766327)

  • 1. Quality articles require peer reviewers as well as authors.
    Mack A
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2005 Mar; 11(2):186. PubMed ID: 15766327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Authorship policy of the Journal of Korean Medical Science.
    Hong ST
    J Korean Med Sci; 2010 May; 25(5):657. PubMed ID: 20436697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do it right the first time: advice for cornea authors.
    Sugar A; Sugar J; Schwab I; Perry H; de Luise V; Soong HK; Weiss J
    Cornea; 2014 Sep; 33(9):879. PubMed ID: 25062337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How to write a medical paper to get it published in a good journal.
    Lundberg GD
    MedGenMed; 2005 Nov; 7(4):36. PubMed ID: 16614658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How to avoid the reviewer's axe: one editor's view.
    Senturia SD
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2004 Jan; 51(1):127-30. PubMed ID: 14995024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A snapshot into reviewer's work; what is the best way to credit them?
    Kumar S; Millar H; Blee I
    Clin Exp Dermatol; 2021 Apr; 46(3):548-549. PubMed ID: 32681653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reviewers' Role in Research.
    Zareen N
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2017 Jul; 27(7):456. PubMed ID: 28818174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reviewing scientific manuscripts: A comprehensive guide for peer reviewers.
    Brown LM; David EA; Karamlou T; Nason KS
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Jun; 153(6):1609-1614. PubMed ID: 28526112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meaningful peer review is integral to quality science and should provide benefits to the authors and reviewers alike.
    Carrell DT; Rajpert-De Meyts E
    Andrology; 2013 Jul; 1(4):531-2. PubMed ID: 23785017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Best practices for survey research reports: a synopsis for authors and reviewers.
    Draugalis JR; Coons SJ; Plaza CM
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2008 Feb; 72(1):11. PubMed ID: 18322573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Upgrading our instructions for authors.
    Schriger DL; Wears RL; Cooper RJ; Callaham ML
    Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Apr; 41(4):565-7. PubMed ID: 12658258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the quality of scientific publications and the responsibility of authors and reviewers.
    Hesse G
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2020 Jul; 140(7):527. PubMed ID: 32108536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tips for writing and publishing an article.
    Nahata MC
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 42(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 18212252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Writing an effective response to reviewers: the goal is to improve the study and get it published!
    Patino CM; Ferreira JC
    J Bras Pneumol; 2019 Feb; 45(1):e20190020. PubMed ID: 30843955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [On rejection of papers submitted for publication].
    Bicas HE
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2005; 68(3):283-4. PubMed ID: 16059554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Researchers, authors and reviewers: what are our responsibilities?
    Kramer MS
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2012 Jul; 26(4):308-9. PubMed ID: 22686381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Editor's nitpicking.
    Castillo M
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2010 Sep; 31(8):1353-4. PubMed ID: 20203110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Advice for authors. Four principal reasons for manuscript rejection].
    Clarke SP
    Perspect Infirm; 2006; 3(3):35-9. PubMed ID: 16480058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors.
    Gasparyan AY; Ayvazyan L; Blackmore H; Kitas GD
    Rheumatol Int; 2011 Nov; 31(11):1409-17. PubMed ID: 21800117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Writing an effective manuscript review: The 6 "Be's" to success.
    Annesley TM
    Clin Chem; 2013 Jul; 59(7):1028-35. PubMed ID: 23741073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.