305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15766372)
1. Coverage of localized gingival recessions: comparison of micro- and macrosurgical techniques.
Burkhardt R; Lang NP
J Clin Periodontol; 2005 Mar; 32(3):287-93. PubMed ID: 15766372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Failure of root coverage of shallow gingival recessions employing GTR and a bioresorbable membrane.
Müller HP; Stahl M; Eger T
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2001 Apr; 21(2):171-81. PubMed ID: 11829391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison between micro- and macrosurgical techniques for the treatment of localized gingival recessions using coronally positioned flaps and enamel matrix derivative.
Andrade PF; Grisi MF; Marcaccini AM; Fernandes PG; Reino DM; Souza SL; Taba M; Palioto DB; Novaes AB
J Periodontol; 2010 Nov; 81(11):1572-9. PubMed ID: 20583919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Harvesting technique using a mucotome and modified surgical procedure for root coverage with enamel matrix derivatives with and without a connective tissue graft.
Gunay H; Dogan S; Geurtsen W
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Oct; 28(5):497-507. PubMed ID: 18991001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Treatment of adjacent gingival recessions with subepithelial connective tissue grafts and the modified tunnel technique.
Tözüm TF; Dini FM
Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 12674352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative clinical evaluation of acellular dermal matrix allograft and connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession.
Rahmani ME; Lades MA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 May; 7(2):63-70. PubMed ID: 16685296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Treatment of class III multiple gingival recessions: a randomized-clinical trial.
Aroca S; Keglevich T; Nikolidakis D; Gera I; Nagy K; Azzi R; Etienne D
J Clin Periodontol; 2010 Jan; 37(1):88-97. PubMed ID: 19968743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Root coverage with subepithelial connective tissue grafts and modified tunnel technique. An evaluation of long-term results.
Tözüm TF
N Y State Dent J; 2006; 72(4):38-41. PubMed ID: 16925012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A promising periodontal procedure for the treatment of adjacent gingival recession defects.
Tözüm TF
J Can Dent Assoc; 2003 Mar; 69(3):155-9. PubMed ID: 12622879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Coronally advanced flap versus connective tissue graft in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a split-mouth study with a 5-year follow-up.
Pini-Prato GP; Cairo F; Nieri M; Franceschi D; Rotundo R; Cortellini P
J Clin Periodontol; 2010 Jul; 37(7):644-50. PubMed ID: 20492074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative clinical study of a subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft for the treatment of gingival recessions: six- to 12-month changes.
de Souza SL; Novaes AB; Grisi DC; Taba M; Grisi MF; de Andrade PF
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2008 Jul; 10(3):87-94. PubMed ID: 18714934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Coronally positioned flap procedures with or without a biodegradable membrane in the treatment of human gingival recession. A 6-year follow-up study.
Leknes KN; Amarante ES; Price DE; Bøe OE; Skavland RJ; Lie T
J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):518-29. PubMed ID: 15842269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of multiple gingival recession.
Dembowska E; Drozdzik A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Sep; 104(3):e1-7. PubMed ID: 17618142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions with the tunnel subepithelial connective tissue graft: a clinical report.
Zabalegui I; Sicilia A; Cambra J; Gil J; Sanz M
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1999 Apr; 19(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 10635186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does placement of a connective tissue graft improve the outcomes of coronally advanced flap for coverage of single gingival recessions in upper anterior teeth? A multi-centre, randomized, double-blind, clinical trial.
Cortellini P; Tonetti M; Baldi C; Francetti L; Rasperini G; Rotundo R; Nieri M; Franceschi D; Labriola A; Prato GP
J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Jan; 36(1):68-79. PubMed ID: 19046326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A clinical/statistical comparison between the subpedicle connective tissue graft method and the guided tissue regeneration technique in root coverage.
Ricci G; Silvestri M; Tinti C; Rasperini G
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1996 Dec; 16(6):538-45. PubMed ID: 9242092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A connective tissue graft envelope technique for the treatment of single gingival recessions: a 1-year study.
Abundo R; Corrente G; des Ambrois AB; Perelli M; Savio L
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2009 Dec; 29(6):593-7. PubMed ID: 20072736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The subepithelial connective tissue graft: part II. Histologic healing and clinical root coverage.
Sedon CL; Breault LG; Covington LL; Bishop BG
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 May; 6(2):139-50. PubMed ID: 15915213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Enamel matrix proteins (Emdogain) in combination with coronally advanced flap or subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of shallow gingival recessions.
Berlucchi I; Francetti L; Del Fabbro M; Testori T; Weinstein RL
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Dec; 22(6):583-93. PubMed ID: 12516830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Augmentation of keratinized gingiva through bilaminar connective tissue grafts: a comparison between two techniques.
Bertoldi C; Bencivenni D; Lucchi A; Consolo U
Minerva Stomatol; 2007; 56(1-2):3-20. PubMed ID: 17287702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
