These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15766378)

  • 1. Influence of handling-relevant factors on the behaviour of a novel calculus-detection device.
    Meissner G; Oehme B; Strackeljan J; Kocher T
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 Mar; 32(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 15766378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro calculus detection with a moved smart ultrasonic device.
    Meissner G; Oehme B; Strackeljan J; Kocher T
    J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Feb; 33(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 16441738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical subgingival calculus detection with a smart ultrasonic device: a pilot study.
    Meissner G; Oehme B; Strackeljan J; Kocher T
    J Clin Periodontol; 2008 Feb; 35(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 18199147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new system to detect residual subgingival calculus: in vitro detection limits.
    Meissner G; Oehme B; Strackeljan J; Kocher T
    J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Mar; 33(3):195-9. PubMed ID: 16489945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Feasibility of computer-assisted recognition of different dental hard tissues.
    Kocher T; Strackeljan J; Behr D
    J Dent Res; 2000 Mar; 79(3):829-34. PubMed ID: 10765956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficiency of subgingival calculus removal with the Vector-system compared to ultrasonic scaling and hand instrumentation in vitro.
    Braun A; Krause F; Frentzen M; Jepsen S
    J Periodontal Res; 2005 Feb; 40(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 15613079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of root surface instrumentation using two piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers and a hand scaler in vivo.
    Kawashima H; Sato S; Kishida M; Ito K
    J Periodontal Res; 2007 Feb; 42(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 17214645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vivo and in vitro effects of an Er:YAG laser, a GaAlAs diode laser, and scaling and root planing on periodontally diseased root surfaces: a comparative histologic study.
    Schwarz F; Sculean A; Berakdar M; Szathmari L; Georg T; Becker J
    Lasers Surg Med; 2003; 32(5):359-66. PubMed ID: 12766958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Removal of root substance with the Vector-system compared with conventional debridement in vitro.
    Braun A; Krause F; Frentzen M; Jepsen S
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 Feb; 32(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 15691344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative study of manual and ultrasonic instrumentation of cementum surfaces: influence of lateral pressure.
    Gagnot G; Mora F; Poblete MG; Vachey E; Michel JF; Cathelineau G
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Apr; 24(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 15119884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Histological and profilometric evaluation of the root surface after instrumentation with a new piezoelectric device - ex vivo study.
    Silva D; Martins O; Matos S; Lopes P; Rolo T; Baptista I
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2015 May; 13(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 24995862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety and efficiency of novel sonic scaler tips in vitro.
    Petersilka GJ; Draenert M; Mehl A; Hickel R; Flemmig TF
    J Clin Periodontol; 2003 Jun; 30(6):551-5. PubMed ID: 12795794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of a linear oscillating device in periodontal treatment: a review.
    Guentsch A; Preshaw PM
    J Clin Periodontol; 2008 Jun; 35(6):514-24. PubMed ID: 18410394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accessibility of an ultrasonic furcation tip to furcation areas of mandibular first and second molars.
    Sugaya T; Kawanami M; Kato H
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2002 Oct; 4(4):132-7. PubMed ID: 12670093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Subgingival debridement with a teflon-coated sonic scaler insert in comparison to conventional instruments and assessment of substance removal on extracted teeth.
    Rühling A; Bernhardt O; Kocher T
    Quintessence Int; 2005 Jun; 36(6):446-52. PubMed ID: 15954250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Significant influence of scaler tip design on root substance loss resulting from ultrasonic scaling: a laserprofilometric in vitro study.
    Jepsen S; Ayna M; Hedderich J; Eberhard J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Nov; 31(11):1003-6. PubMed ID: 15491317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A method for the validation of a new calculus detection system.
    Meissner G; Oehme B; Strackeljan J; Kuhr A; Kocher T
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 Jun; 32(6):659-64. PubMed ID: 15882227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Changes in the enamel surface after calculus removal].
    Plagmann HC; Wartenberg M; Kocher T
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Apr; 44(4):285-8. PubMed ID: 2702166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A clinical and SEM evaluation of the efficiency of sofscale gel and hand scaling and hand scaling alone.
    Thomas K; Vandana KL; Reddy VR
    Indian J Dent Res; 2002; 13(3-4):173-82. PubMed ID: 12765098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effectiveness of two sonic and two ultrasonic scaler tips in furcations.
    Patterson M; Eick JD; Eberhart AB; Gross K; Killoy WJ
    J Periodontol; 1989 Jun; 60(6):325-9. PubMed ID: 2674397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.