240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15766378)
1. Influence of handling-relevant factors on the behaviour of a novel calculus-detection device.
Meissner G; Oehme B; Strackeljan J; Kocher T
J Clin Periodontol; 2005 Mar; 32(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 15766378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro calculus detection with a moved smart ultrasonic device.
Meissner G; Oehme B; Strackeljan J; Kocher T
J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Feb; 33(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 16441738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical subgingival calculus detection with a smart ultrasonic device: a pilot study.
Meissner G; Oehme B; Strackeljan J; Kocher T
J Clin Periodontol; 2008 Feb; 35(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 18199147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new system to detect residual subgingival calculus: in vitro detection limits.
Meissner G; Oehme B; Strackeljan J; Kocher T
J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Mar; 33(3):195-9. PubMed ID: 16489945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Feasibility of computer-assisted recognition of different dental hard tissues.
Kocher T; Strackeljan J; Behr D
J Dent Res; 2000 Mar; 79(3):829-34. PubMed ID: 10765956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficiency of subgingival calculus removal with the Vector-system compared to ultrasonic scaling and hand instrumentation in vitro.
Braun A; Krause F; Frentzen M; Jepsen S
J Periodontal Res; 2005 Feb; 40(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 15613079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of root surface instrumentation using two piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers and a hand scaler in vivo.
Kawashima H; Sato S; Kishida M; Ito K
J Periodontal Res; 2007 Feb; 42(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 17214645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vivo and in vitro effects of an Er:YAG laser, a GaAlAs diode laser, and scaling and root planing on periodontally diseased root surfaces: a comparative histologic study.
Schwarz F; Sculean A; Berakdar M; Szathmari L; Georg T; Becker J
Lasers Surg Med; 2003; 32(5):359-66. PubMed ID: 12766958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Removal of root substance with the Vector-system compared with conventional debridement in vitro.
Braun A; Krause F; Frentzen M; Jepsen S
J Clin Periodontol; 2005 Feb; 32(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 15691344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative study of manual and ultrasonic instrumentation of cementum surfaces: influence of lateral pressure.
Gagnot G; Mora F; Poblete MG; Vachey E; Michel JF; Cathelineau G
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Apr; 24(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 15119884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Histological and profilometric evaluation of the root surface after instrumentation with a new piezoelectric device - ex vivo study.
Silva D; Martins O; Matos S; Lopes P; Rolo T; Baptista I
Int J Dent Hyg; 2015 May; 13(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 24995862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Safety and efficiency of novel sonic scaler tips in vitro.
Petersilka GJ; Draenert M; Mehl A; Hickel R; Flemmig TF
J Clin Periodontol; 2003 Jun; 30(6):551-5. PubMed ID: 12795794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of a linear oscillating device in periodontal treatment: a review.
Guentsch A; Preshaw PM
J Clin Periodontol; 2008 Jun; 35(6):514-24. PubMed ID: 18410394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accessibility of an ultrasonic furcation tip to furcation areas of mandibular first and second molars.
Sugaya T; Kawanami M; Kato H
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2002 Oct; 4(4):132-7. PubMed ID: 12670093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Subgingival debridement with a teflon-coated sonic scaler insert in comparison to conventional instruments and assessment of substance removal on extracted teeth.
Rühling A; Bernhardt O; Kocher T
Quintessence Int; 2005 Jun; 36(6):446-52. PubMed ID: 15954250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Significant influence of scaler tip design on root substance loss resulting from ultrasonic scaling: a laserprofilometric in vitro study.
Jepsen S; Ayna M; Hedderich J; Eberhard J
J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Nov; 31(11):1003-6. PubMed ID: 15491317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A method for the validation of a new calculus detection system.
Meissner G; Oehme B; Strackeljan J; Kuhr A; Kocher T
J Clin Periodontol; 2005 Jun; 32(6):659-64. PubMed ID: 15882227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Changes in the enamel surface after calculus removal].
Plagmann HC; Wartenberg M; Kocher T
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Apr; 44(4):285-8. PubMed ID: 2702166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A clinical and SEM evaluation of the efficiency of sofscale gel and hand scaling and hand scaling alone.
Thomas K; Vandana KL; Reddy VR
Indian J Dent Res; 2002; 13(3-4):173-82. PubMed ID: 12765098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effectiveness of two sonic and two ultrasonic scaler tips in furcations.
Patterson M; Eick JD; Eberhart AB; Gross K; Killoy WJ
J Periodontol; 1989 Jun; 60(6):325-9. PubMed ID: 2674397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
