These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15766577)

  • 1. Wear of ten dental restorative materials in five wear simulators--results of a round robin test.
    Heintze SD; Zappini G; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2005 Apr; 21(4):304-17. PubMed ID: 15766577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of three different methods for the quantification of the in vitro wear of dental materials.
    Heintze SD; Cavalleri A; Forjanic M; Zellweger G; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2006 Nov; 22(11):1051-62. PubMed ID: 16386293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Round robin test: wear of nine dental restorative materials in six different wear simulators - supplement to the round robin test of 2005.
    Heintze SD; Barkmeier WW; Latta MA; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2011 Feb; 27(2):e1-9. PubMed ID: 20888629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of the antagonist material on the wear of different composites using two different wear simulation methods.
    Heintze SD; Zellweger G; Cavalleri A; Ferracane J
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):166-75. PubMed ID: 16087228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins.
    Mandikos MN; McGivney GP; Davis E; Bush PJ; Carter JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 85(4):386-95. PubMed ID: 11319537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How to qualify and validate wear simulation devices and methods.
    Heintze SD
    Dent Mater; 2006 Aug; 22(8):712-34. PubMed ID: 16574212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two-body wear resistance and degree of conversion of laboratory-processed composite materials.
    Knobloch LA; Kerby RE; Seghi R; van Putten M
    Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(5):432-8. PubMed ID: 10709525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-body wear of resin denture teeth with and without nanofillers.
    Stober T; Henninger M; Schmitter M; Pritsch M; Rammelsberg P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Feb; 103(2):108-17. PubMed ID: 20141815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in translucency and color of particulate filler composite resins.
    Nakamura T; Saito O; Mizuno M; Tanaka H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(5):494-9. PubMed ID: 12375467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro wear of indirect composite restoratives.
    Suzuki S; Nagai E; Taira Y; Minesaki Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):431-6. PubMed ID: 12447221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Esthetic restorative materials and opposing enamel wear.
    Olivera AB; Marques MM
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(3):332-7. PubMed ID: 18505225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surface roughness and gloss of dental materials as a function of force and polishing time in vitro.
    Heintze SD; Forjanic M; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):146-65. PubMed ID: 16084582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation of wear in vivo and six laboratory wear methods.
    Heintze SD; Faouzi M; Rousson V; Ozcan M
    Dent Mater; 2012 Sep; 28(9):961-73. PubMed ID: 22698644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part I: in vitro investigations.
    Frankenberger R; García-Godoy F; Lohbauer U; Petschelt A; Krämer N
    Am J Dent; 2005 Feb; 18(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 15810477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of professional prophylaxis on reducing discoloration of different aesthetic restorative materials.
    Samra AP; Ribeiro DG; Borges CP; Kossatz S
    J Dent; 2012 Dec; 40 Suppl 2():e71-6. PubMed ID: 22713738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of different surface treatments on the repair bond strength of indirect composites.
    Souza EM; Francischone CE; Powers JM; Rached RN; Vieira S
    Am J Dent; 2008 Apr; 21(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 18578175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of two methods for measuring generalized wear of dental materials.
    Kawai K; Tsuchitani Y
    J Osaka Univ Dent Sch; 1994 Dec; 34():1-8. PubMed ID: 8935088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In situ effect of an erosive challenge on different restorative materials and on enamel adjacent to these materials.
    Rios D; Honório HM; Francisconi LF; Magalhães AC; de Andrade Moreira Machado MA; Buzalaf MA
    J Dent; 2008 Feb; 36(2):152-7. PubMed ID: 18191012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical wear of posterior metal-free polymer crowns. One-year results from a randomized clinical trial.
    Ohlmann B; Uekermann J; Dreyhaupt J; Schmitter M; Mussotter K; Rammelsberg P
    J Dent; 2007 Mar; 35(3):246-52. PubMed ID: 17027139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Indirect restorations for severe tooth wear: fracture risk and layer thickness.
    Hamburger JT; Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Huysmans MC
    J Dent; 2014 Apr; 42(4):413-8. PubMed ID: 24120523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.