271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15767160)
1. Performance of the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens in relation to capsulorhexis size.
Vargas LG; Auffarth GU; Becker KA; Rabsilber TM; Holzer MP
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Feb; 31(2):363-8. PubMed ID: 15767160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Early visual results with the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens.
Dogru M; Honda R; Omoto M; Toda I; Fujishima H; Arai H; Matsuyama M; Nishijima S; Hida Y; Yagi Y; Tsubota K
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 May; 31(5):895-902. PubMed ID: 15975453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Near vision restoration with refractive lens exchange and pseudoaccommodating and multifocal refractive and diffractive intraocular lenses: comparative clinical study.
Alió JL; Tavolato M; De la Hoz F; Claramonte P; Rodríguez-Prats JL; Galal A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Dec; 30(12):2494-503. PubMed ID: 15617915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Synchrony dual-optic accommodating intraocular lens. Part 2: pilot clinical evaluation.
Ossma IL; Galvis A; Vargas LG; Trager MJ; Vagefi MR; McLeod SD
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jan; 33(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 17189792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Early visual results with the rollable ThinOptX intraocular lens.
Dogru M; Honda R; Omoto M; Fujishima H; Yagi Y; Tsubota K; Kojima T; Matsuyama M; Nishijima S; Yagi Y
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Mar; 30(3):558-65. PubMed ID: 15050249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Functional vision after cataract removal with multifocal and accommodating intraocular lens implantation: prospective comparative evaluation of Array multifocal and 1CU accommodating lenses.
Claoué C
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Oct; 30(10):2088-91. PubMed ID: 15474819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Visual and accommodative outcomes 1 year after implantation of an accommodating intraocular lens based on a new concept.
Alió JL; Ben-nun J; Rodríguez-Prats JL; Plaza AB
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1671-8. PubMed ID: 19781458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visual outcomes after accommodating intraocular lens implantation.
Macsai MS; Padnick-Silver L; Fontes BM
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Apr; 32(4):628-33. PubMed ID: 16698485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing the 1CU accommodative, multifocal, and monofocal intraocular lenses: a randomized trial.
Harman FE; Maling S; Kampougeris G; Langan L; Khan I; Lee N; Bloom PA
Ophthalmology; 2008 Jun; 115(6):993-1001.e2. PubMed ID: 18031818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Accommodation in pseudophakic eyes with the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens].
Wang J; Fu J; Wang NL; Kang HJ; Yang WL
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Sep; 41(9):807-11. PubMed ID: 16191347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Objective measurement of intraocular lens movement and dioptric change with a focus shift accommodating intraocular lens.
Hancox J; Spalton D; Heatley C; Jayaram H; Marshall J
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Jul; 32(7):1098-103. PubMed ID: 16857494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical evaluation of the Crystalens AT-45 accommodating intraocular lens: results of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration clinical trial.
Cumming JS; Colvard DM; Dell SJ; Doane J; Fine IH; Hoffman RS; Packer M; Slade SG
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 May; 32(5):812-25. PubMed ID: 16765800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of 6-month results of implantation of the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens with conventional intraocular lenses.
Küchle M; Seitz B; Langenbucher A; Gusek-Schneider GC; Martus P; Nguyen NX;
Ophthalmology; 2004 Feb; 111(2):318-24. PubMed ID: 15019382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Visual outcomes with a single-optic accommodating intraocular lens and a low-addition-power rotational asymmetric multifocal intraocular lens.
Alió JL; Plaza-Puche AB; Montalban R; Javaloy J
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Jun; 38(6):978-85. PubMed ID: 22624896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biconvex posterior chamber accommodating intraocular lens implantation after cataract surgery: long-term outcomes.
Saiki M; Negishi K; Dogru M; Yamaguchi T; Tsubota K
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Apr; 36(4):603-8. PubMed ID: 20362852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Visual and refractive status at different focal distances after implantation of the ReSTOR multifocal intraocular lens.
Blaylock JF; Si Z; Vickers C
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Sep; 32(9):1464-73. PubMed ID: 16931257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Objective accommodative amplitude and dynamics with the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens.
Wolffsohn JS; Hunt OA; Naroo S; Gilmartin B; Shah S; Cunliffe IA; Benson MT; Mantry S
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Mar; 47(3):1230-5. PubMed ID: 16505063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance of the 1CU accommodating IOL.
Galand A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Jan; 32(1):3; author reply 3-4. PubMed ID: 16516759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Visual acuity outcomes with SA60D3, SN60D3, and ZM900 multifocal IOL implantation after phacoemulsification.
Ngo C; Singh M; Sng C; Loon SC; Chan YH; Thean L
J Refract Surg; 2010 Mar; 26(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 20229949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. One-year outcomes with new-generation multifocal intraocular lenses.
Cillino S; Casuccio A; Di Pace F; Morreale R; Pillitteri F; Cillino G; Lodato G
Ophthalmology; 2008 Sep; 115(9):1508-16. PubMed ID: 18538402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]