These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15769238)

  • 1. Between-individual comparisons in performance evaluation: a perspective from prospect theory.
    Wong KF; Kwong JY
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 Mar; 90(2):284-94. PubMed ID: 15769238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Increasing performance appraisal effectiveness: matching task types, appraisal process, and rater training.
    Lee C
    Acad Manage Rev; 1985 Apr; 10(2):322-31. PubMed ID: 10271248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Testing the self-efficacy-performance linkage of social-cognitive theory.
    Harrison AW; Rainer RK; Hochwarter WA; Thompson KR
    J Soc Psychol; 1997 Feb; 137(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 9121144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of group discussion on performance judgments: rating accuracy, contrast effects, and halo.
    Palmer JK; Loveland JM
    J Psychol; 2008 Mar; 142(2):117-30. PubMed ID: 18447070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of implicit person theory on performance appraisals.
    Heslin PA; Latham GP; VandeWalle D
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 Sep; 90(5):842-56. PubMed ID: 16162058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating science arguments: evidence, uncertainty, and argument strength.
    Corner A; Hahn U
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Sep; 15(3):199-212. PubMed ID: 19751071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do they see eye to eye? Management and employee perspectives of high-performance work systems and influence processes on service quality.
    Liao H; Toya K; Lepak DP; Hong Y
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Mar; 94(2):371-91. PubMed ID: 19271796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. "It's not my fault--but only I can change it": counterfactual and prefactual thoughts of managers.
    Goerke M; Moller J; Schulz-Hardt S; Napiersky U; Frey D
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Apr; 89(2):279-92. PubMed ID: 15065975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating dynamic performance: the influence of salient Gestalt characteristics on performance ratings.
    Reb J; Cropanzano R
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Mar; 92(2):490-9. PubMed ID: 17371093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of improper sets of information on judgment: how irrelevant information can bias judged probability.
    Dougherty MR; Sprenger A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 May; 135(2):262-81. PubMed ID: 16719653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of pay level satisfaction.
    Williams ML; McDaniel MA; Nguyen NT
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 Mar; 91(2):392-413. PubMed ID: 16551191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An examination of raters' and ratees' preferences in process and feedback in performance appraisal.
    Manshor AT; Kamalanabhan TJ
    Psychol Rep; 2000 Feb; 86(1):203-14. PubMed ID: 10778271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Potential performance theory (PPT): a general theory of task performance applied to morality.
    Trafimow D; Rice S
    Psychol Rev; 2008 Apr; 115(2):447-62. PubMed ID: 18426298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When fit is fundamental: performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers.
    Lyness KS; Heilman ME
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 Jul; 91(4):777-85. PubMed ID: 16834505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The relationship between human resource investments and organizational performance: a firm-level examination of equilibrium theory.
    Subramony M; Krause N; Norton J; Burns GN
    J Appl Psychol; 2008 Jul; 93(4):778-88. PubMed ID: 18642983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Informativity and asymmetry in comparisons.
    Bowdle BF; Gentner D
    Cogn Psychol; 1997 Dec; 34(3):244-86. PubMed ID: 9466832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exploring how constraints created by other people influence intraindividual variation in objective performance measures.
    Stewart GL; Nandkeolyar AK
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Jul; 92(4):1149-58. PubMed ID: 17638472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Job performance over time is a function of latent trajectories and previous performance.
    Zyphur MJ; Chaturvedi S; Arvey RD
    J Appl Psychol; 2008 Jan; 93(1):217-24. PubMed ID: 18211147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Performance-Perceptual Test (PPT) and its relationship to aided reported handicap and hearing aid satisfaction.
    Saunders GH; Forsline A
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 16672792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceived overqualification and its outcomes: the moderating role of empowerment.
    Erdogan B; Bauer TN
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Mar; 94(2):557-65. PubMed ID: 19271809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.