These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15770012)

  • 21. The feasibility of breast cancer screening.
    Health Technol; 1987; 1(1):26-37. PubMed ID: 10311915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. American Cancer Society: Cost of screening mammography. Issues, recommendations, and solutions.
    Cancer; 1987 Oct; 60(7 Suppl):1694-9. PubMed ID: 3651997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. What are the benefits and costs of screening mammograms on Kentucky women aged 40-49?
    Spratt JS; Gaines BM; Aaron WS; Cerrito P
    J Surg Oncol; 1996 Oct; 63(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 8888797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mammographic screening for breast cancer: An invited review of the benefits and costs.
    Greif JM
    Breast; 2010 Aug; 19(4):268-72. PubMed ID: 20371181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Mammography utilization, public health impact, and cost-effectiveness in the United States.
    White E; Urban N; Taylor V
    Annu Rev Public Health; 1993; 14():605-33. PubMed ID: 8323604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mammography screening for breast cancer.
    King JM
    Cancer; 1994 Apr; 73(7):2003-6. PubMed ID: 8137231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age.
    Lisby MD
    Am Fam Physician; 2004 Nov; 70(9):1750-2. PubMed ID: 15554494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The impact of alternative practices on the cost and quality of mammographic screening in the United States.
    Burnside E; Belkora J; Esserman L
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2001 Jul; 2(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 11899786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Economic approach to breast cancer screening in Belgium].
    Autier P; Grivegnée AR
    Rev Med Brux; 1995; 16(4):326-9. PubMed ID: 7481252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of screening mammography.
    Stout NK; Rosenberg MA; Trentham-Dietz A; Smith MA; Robinson SM; Fryback DG
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Jun; 98(11):774-82. PubMed ID: 16757702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Early detection of breast cancer in women.
    Humphrey LL; Ballard DJ
    Prim Care; 1989 Mar; 16(1):115-32. PubMed ID: 2495540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The muddle over screening breast Ca.
    Thomas P
    Med World News; 1988 May; 29(9):34-6, 42, 47-8. PubMed ID: 10312486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Offering mammography is beneficial in the long run].
    Cederblom S
    Lakartidningen; 1995 Dec; 92(51-52):4865-8. PubMed ID: 8544497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mass breast cancer screening in The Netherlands: 10 years and counting.
    Kuska B
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1998 Dec; 90(23):1764-6. PubMed ID: 9839512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Re: Efficacy of breast cancer screening in the community according to risk level.
    Duffy SW; Smith RA; Tabar L
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Nov; 97(22):1703; author reply 1703-4. PubMed ID: 16288125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cost-effectiveness of mammography, MRI, and ultrasonography for breast cancer screening.
    Feig S
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):879-91. PubMed ID: 20868891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Cancer of the breast: mass screening by mammography is not justified].
    Colin C
    Rev Med Liege; 1998 Apr; 53(4):212-3. PubMed ID: 9641016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Mass screening of breast cancer: response and justification].
    Bartsch P; Gordenne W
    Rev Med Liege; 1998 Apr; 53(4):214-5. PubMed ID: 9641017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Screening mammography: increasing the effort toward breast cancer detection.
    Hamwi DA
    Nurse Pract; 1990 Dec; 15(12):27, 30-2. PubMed ID: 2284059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Impact of insurance coverage and socioeconomic factors on screening mammography patients' selection of digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography.
    Falomo E; Myers K; Reichel KF; Carson KA; Mullen L; Di Carlo P; Harvey S
    Breast J; 2018 Nov; 24(6):1091-1093. PubMed ID: 30240094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.