These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15771095)
1. Microbiological characterization of winery effluents: an inventory of the sites for different treatment systems. Jourjon F; Khaldi S; Reveillere M; Thibault C; Poulard A; Chretien P; Bednar J Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 15771095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Uses of winery and distillery effluents in agriculture: characterisation of nutrient and hazardous components. Bustamante MA; Paredes C; Moral R; Moreno-Caselles J; Pérez-Espinosa A; Pérez-Murcia MD Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 15771110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microflora evaluation of two agro-industrial effluents treated by the JACTO jet-loop type reactor system. Eusébio A; Mateus M; Baeta-Hall L; Almeida-Vara E; Duarte JC Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 15771105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effluent characterization and different modes of reuse in agriculture-a model case study. Das M; Kumar A Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2009 Jun; 16(4):466-73. PubMed ID: 19224260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Faecal bacterial indicators removal in various wastewater treatment plants located in Almendares River watershed (Cuba). Garcia-Armisen T; Prats J; Marrero Y; Servais P Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(4):773-9. PubMed ID: 18776611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of Activated Sludge Model No. 1 to biological treatment of pure winery effluents: case studies. Stricker AE; Racault Y Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 15771107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Economic considerations for wastewater upgrading alternatives: an Israeli test case. Fine P; Halperin R; Hadas E J Environ Manage; 2006 Jan; 78(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 16115725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Potential chemical and microbiological risks on human health from urban wastewater reuse in agriculture. Case study of wastewater effluents in Spain. Muñoz I; Tomàs N; Mas J; García-Reyes JF; Molina-Díaz A; Fernández-Alba AR J Environ Sci Health B; 2010 May; 45(4):300-9. PubMed ID: 20401781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Treatment and valorisation of winery wastewater by a new biophysical process (ECCF). Colin T; Bories A; Sire Y; Perrin R Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 15771104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Degradation of pesticide residues in vineyard effluents by activated sludge treatment. Esteve K; Poupot C; Mietton-peuchot M; Milisic V Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(7):1885-94. PubMed ID: 19809152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microbiological water quality in a large in-building, water recycling facility. Birks R; Colbourne J; Hills S; Hobson R Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 15344787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A long-term, multitrophic level study to assess pulp and paper mill effluent effects on aquatic communities in four US receiving waters: characteristics of the study streams, sample sites, mills, and mill effluents. Hall TJ; Ragsdale RL; Arthurs WJ; Ikoma J; Borton DL; Cook DL Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Apr; 5(2):199-218. PubMed ID: 19063588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microbiological monitoring of acid mine drainage treatment systems and aquatic surroundings using real-time PCR. Han JS; Kim CG Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(11):2083-91. PubMed ID: 19494446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nitrobacter and Nitrospira genera as representatives of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria: detection, quantification and growth along the lower Seine River (France). Cébron A; Garnier J Water Res; 2005 Dec; 39(20):4979-92. PubMed ID: 16303163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A long-term, multitrophic level study to assess pulp and paper mill effluent effects on aquatic communities in four US receiving waters: lessons learned. Hall TJ; Fisher RP; Rodgers JH; Minshall GW; Landis WG; Kovacs T; Firth BK; Dubé MG; Flinders CA; Deardorff TL; Borton DL Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Apr; 5(2):283-90. PubMed ID: 19115805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bioremediation of industrial waste by using bat guano. Gadhikar YA; Zade VS; Khadse T J Environ Sci Eng; 2007 Apr; 49(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 18476410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Twenty years' monitoring of Mèze stabilisation ponds: part II--Removal of faecal indicators. Brissaud F; Andrianarison T; Brouillet JL; Picot B Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(12):33-41. PubMed ID: 16114661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Groundwater contamination by microbiological and chemical substances released from hospital wastewater: health risk assessment for drinking water consumers. Emmanuel E; Pierre MG; Perrodin Y Environ Int; 2009 May; 35(4):718-26. PubMed ID: 19269687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sources of pathogenic microorganisms and their fate during land application of wastes. Gerba CP; Smith JE J Environ Qual; 2005; 34(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 15647533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quali-quantitative characterization and wastewater treatment of a winery located in the mid-west of Santa Catarina state, South of Brazil. Ortigara AR; Sezerino PH; Bento AP; Scaratti D Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(4):1025-31. PubMed ID: 19700841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]